"Reco Diver" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"L Hays" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:"Sean S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:>From: "Lightweight" [email hidden]
Quoted message said:>As well as does any bomb that weighs as much as 9 of my cars. Is
this
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:the
Quoted message said:>type of bomb that is similar in damage to one big ass frag grenade?
I
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>remember hearing something about the daisy cutters blowing shrapnel
over
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>large areas, a hideous weapon.
I'd have to double check, but I believe the newer bomb relies more on
the
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:force
Quoted message said:of the initial concussion for the bulk of its damage...
The new bomb is the same as the old bomb.
The new bomb is different in its size and guidance system. That said, it is similar in that it is
a designed to create a lateral blast with ~1,000 psi overpressure developed near ground zero. It
is also similar since it is a GSX slurry device and not an FAE.
BLU-82 is not a fuel air explosive, it also uses a slurry mix. It's contents are contained until the
charge detonates the explosives.
The difference? It has more explosives/heavier and is somewhat smart (see JDAM) Not entirely a smart
bomb per se since it cannot steer away or acquire a new target but uses satellites to help guide
it's gravity fed and not rocket propelled fall.
Lance