Road Cycling · Public discussion

MI5 Persecution: Gagged by BBC Ariels editor

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 1 post · 252 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 November 2006
Last activity
29 November 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
252
Views / 30 days
4

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Gagged by BBC Ariel's editor

    On 25 June 1997 I wrote to Landmark Publishing Services, who deal with advertising for the BBC's in-house magazine Ariel.
    I requested they run an advert "BBC Newsreaders Spying on my Home" in the Personal column. They accepted my instructions
    and payment, and the following advert did indeed run in Ariel's issue of 8 July 1997.

    Following the successful placement of this small ad, I wrote again to Landmark on 17 July 1997, requesting they run exactly
    the same advert for 10 issues, enclosing payment. Unfortunately, the advert did not appear in any further issues of Ariel,
    because Ariel's editor Robin Reynolds nixed it. Here is an email from Elaine Smith of Landmark dated 26 August 1997.

    Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 09:34:25 +0100 (BST)
    X-Sender: [email hidden]
    From: [email hidden] (Elaine Smith)
    Subject: Re: advert - ariel

    With regard to your E-mail of 22 August 1997 concerning your advertisement
    in the Ariel magazine.

    I was instructed by Ariel to remove your advertisement from the classified
    pages as they were not comfortable with the contents of the Internet
    address you supplied. I realise we have placed the advertisement
    successfully for you in the past. Unfortunately this time they decided they
    did not want it printed.

    [snip]

    I'm really sorry for the inconvenience I know this will have caused you,
    but as you will understand Ariel have the last say in what is printed and
    what is not.

    Kind Regards

    Elaine Smith
    Classified Advertising Manager.

    In my reply to Elaine Smith, I said;

    I will speak to them directly, I believe their email address is
    [email hidden]. As you say, if the advert went through the first time,
    then it should have gone through this time without problems. As I see it,
    either what is on the website is true (which is my belief) in which case
    they should allow it to be published, or else it is symptomatic of
    delusions in which case again any reasonable person would recognise it
    as such and its publication would not be suppressed. After all Britain
    is not supposed to have censorship - it isn't a Communist country.

    I also wrote to Mr Reynolds, Ariel's editor, asking him to reconsider his decision to censor my advert. He replied
    with the following letter;

    Since a magazine's editor has final say over what appears in the publication, there is nothing further that I can do
    to encourage Ariel to accept my advert. Mr Reynold's censorship of my legitimate complaint gives the game away a bit, though.
    The BBC wish people to think of them as truthful and impartial - yet when they are caught harassing one of their audience, they
    resort to the same censoring tactics characteristic of the regimes they hypocritically condemn.

    801

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.