Road Cycling · Public discussion

Masters classes

Started by Pete Beall · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,038 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 January 2003
Last activity
23 January 2003
Original author
Pete Beall
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,038
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The recent discussion on master categories and classes prompted me to un-archive an old dB. My goal
    had been to try to get a better way to categorize older racers to make events more fun for everyone;
    we don't do this for the money. I have quite a bit of data in the archive and I haven't reviewed it
    all, but I do remember that I tried looking at all sorts of different events and finally settled on
    the time trial as the best yardstick. I pulled out well defined NW time trials where a time and
    distance were provided and calculated the average speed as a measure of rider strength. I then tried
    to get a measure of the RA and actual category of the rider, unavailable in most cases. I tried to
    get promoters to make the rider category available for the master riders, no luck; I tried to get
    the category and age from the USCF, no luck.

    I'm expecting that if I could gather enough data, a better way for dividing up master's
    classes might show up. If you want to see what I revived as a first start from 2000, go to
    myweb.cableone.netAverage%20speed.pdf

    If anyone has any suggestions on where to go with this study, let me know.

    Pete

    --
    petebeall.netpetebeall.net

  2. Pete Beall wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    The recent discussion on master categories and classes prompted


    me

    Quoted message said:

    to un-archive an old dB. My goal had been to try to get a better way to categorize older racers to
    make events more fun for everyone; we don't do this for the money. I have quite a bit of data in
    the archive and I haven't reviewed it all, but I do remember that I tried looking at all sorts of
    different events and finally settled on the time trial as the best yardstick. I pulled out well
    defined NW time trials where a time and distance were provided and calculated the average speed as
    a measure of rider strength. I then tried to get a measure of the RA and actual category of the
    rider, unavailable in most cases. I tried to get promoters to make the rider category available for
    the master riders, no luck; I tried to get the category and age from the USCF, no luck.

    I'm expecting that if I could gather enough data, a better way


    for

    Quoted message said:

    dividing up master's classes might show up. If you want to see what I revived as a first start from
    2000, go to myweb.cableone.netAverage%20speed.pdf

    If anyone has any suggestions on where to go with this study, let me know.

    Pete

    --
    petebeall.netpetebeall.net

    I've always thought that if a master didn't like the race offered in his age category or his age
    category was not offered he can always race in is primary category, 1/2, 3,4 etc.

    Why do we need yet another category?

    Wade

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.