--
McPloppy ©
{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
--
McPloppy ©
{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
Am I missing irony here? Are you the same...erm..."Mcploppy" who posted the
article recently about daddy participating in the Caledonian Challenge? An
event which seems to require the construction of numerous marquees along the
route of the WHW? (Well, *that* won't damage the vegetation underneath,
will it!). An event which requires an Army helicopter to scuttle up and
down the route all day to deliver dry socks to the weary executives? An
event which cannot but help itself turn an innocent field into a quagmire as
the exhausted city gents slump into their Volvos at the end of their
challenge, a quagmire which takes the entire summer to heal? An event which
after its passage some might say leaves a trail of plastic bottles, crisp
bags and other rubbish? If you are, did the thought not cross your mind
that posting a link to an article about making a minum impact might seem
ironic in the extreme?
As an aside, in glancing through the referenced article, I did wonder if its
effort to add flesh (unnecessarily in my humble opinion) to the concept of
"take only pictures, leave only footprints" before hammering it to death
completely by suggesting that the "pack it in, pack it out" principle might
be best expressed by the use of portaloos, well I wondered if it might just
be missing the point just a tiny little bit.....
D
"Mcploppy ©" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:--
McPloppy ©{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
Dave typed:
Quoted message said:Am I missing irony here? Are you the same...erm..."Mcploppy" who
posted the article recently about daddy participating in the
Caledonian Challenge? An event which seems to require the
construction of numerous marquees along the route of the WHW? (Well,
*that* won't damage the vegetation underneath, will it!). An event
which requires an Army helicopter to scuttle up and down the route
all day to deliver dry socks to the weary executives? An event which
cannot but help itself turn an innocent field into a quagmire as the
exhausted city gents slump into their Volvos at the end of their
challenge, a quagmire which takes the entire summer to heal? An
event which after its passage some might say leaves a trail of
plastic bottles, crisp bags and other rubbish? If you are, did the
thought not cross your mind that posting a link to an article about
making a minum impact might seem ironic in the extreme?
As an aside, in glancing through the referenced article, I did wonder
if its effort to add flesh (unnecessarily in my humble opinion) to
the concept of "take only pictures, leave only footprints" before
hammering it to death completely by suggesting that the "pack it in,
pack it out" principle might be best expressed by the use of
portaloos, well I wondered if it might just be missing the point just
a tiny little bit.....D
"Mcploppy ©" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:--
McPloppy ©{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your reply, Yes it is the same McPloppy that posts articles about
his dads walks etc.
Yes I believe that the article is meant to "add flesh to the concept of
"take only pictures, leave only footprints""
Quoted message said:"An event which after its passage some might say leaves a trail of
plastic bottles, crisp bags and other rubbish?
Well if all the 1600 participants and the organisers apply the principles
in the article, IMO damage would be limited.
--
McPloppy ©
{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
In article <[email hidden]>, Mcploppy © <gregMYSHOEScrawfo
[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
Thanks for your reply, Yes it is the same McPloppy that posts articles about
his dads walks etc.
Yes I believe that the article is meant to "add flesh to the concept of
"take only pictures, leave only footprints""
Quoted message said:
Well if all the 1600 participants and the organisers apply the principles
in the article, IMO damage would be limited.
Nonetheless, these pages:
http://www.chiadfhear.co.uk/main/walking/impact/
http://www.chiadfhear.co.uk/main/walking/challenge/
do seem somewhat incongruous on the same menu.
Especially when the Caledonian Challenge site is hardly illustrative of
minimal impact:
http://www.caledonianchallenge.com/past/gallery.php
However, I suppose it could be argued that picture "cc04-7" does show
lots of people only leaving footprints.
It's also interesting to note the "Mcploppy" Caledonian Challenge team
are considering a 2005 attempt on the 24 hour three peaks. Does the
team consider this "challenge" to be an environmentally friendly exploit
with minimal impact?
--
Russ Clare
Always assume (an ironic) smiley
Russ Clare typed:
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>, Mcploppy ©
<gregMYSHOEScrawfo [email hidden]> writesQuoted message said:
Thanks for your reply, Yes it is the same McPloppy that posts
articles about his dads walks etc.
Yes I believe that the article is meant to "add flesh to the
concept of "take only pictures, leave only footprints""Quoted message said:
Well if all the 1600 participants and the organisers apply the
principles in the article, IMO damage would be limited.Nonetheless, these pages:
http://www.chiadfhear.co.uk/main/walking/impact/
http://www.chiadfhear.co.uk/main/walking/challenge/
do seem somewhat incongruous on the same menu.Especially when the Caledonian Challenge site is hardly illustrative
of minimal impact:
http://www.caledonianchallenge.com/past/gallery.phpHowever, I suppose it could be argued that picture "cc04-7" does show
lots of people only leaving footprints.It's also interesting to note the "Mcploppy" Caledonian Challenge
team are considering a 2005 attempt on the 24 hour three peaks. Does
the team consider this "challenge" to be an environmentally friendly
exploit with minimal impact?
I'm not going to comment on the team. I am not part of the team. There is no
"Mcploppy" Caledonian Challenge team.
The team my dad was part of was team Step by Step. If you have a look at my
dad's website, you will find his e-mail address, perhaps you could ask him
yourself if the team consider this "challenge" to be an environmentally
friendly exploit with minimal impact? :-)
--
McPloppy ©
{ Remove both MyShoes to email me }
{ Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/bbel }
{ Local Radio: http://tinyurl.com/j1vi }
{ My Alternative Site: http://tinyurl.com/rynb }
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.