General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Mad Cows and Madder Humans

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 359 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 July 2005
Last activity
9 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
359
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...>
    Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:56 am
    Subject: Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human News notmilk2002
    Offline
    Send Email

    Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human Disease News

    In November of 2004, I wrote a series of columns
    regarding USDA's Second Mad Cow Disease coverup.
    USDA denied, as I provided evidence that they lied.
    This last week of June, 2005, USDA has admitted
    that they lied. So what else is new? As a result of
    USDA's clever brainwashing, Americans no longer
    give a damn. At the conclusion of this column,
    I'll include my astounding November, 2004 column.
    Meanwhile...back at the farm...

    When the subject is Mad Cow Disease,
    consumers no longer give a damn.

    The day after America's second Mad Cow was confirmed,
    cattle futures soared 70 cents per pound on strong
    trading. Cattlemen now know that meat-eaters don't
    really care about Mad Cow Disease.

    What's next?

    A new test for Mad Cow Disese has been developed by
    Vacci-Test Corporation. The new test requires just one
    drop of blood from a suspected cow. That assay will
    determine whether the suspect animal has a neurological
    disorder. The test will cost about $20 per cow, which
    should add about two cents to a meat-eater's next burger.

    Coming Soon: A test for Mad Human Disease?
    ____________________________________
    My Mad Cow Column of November 20, 2004
    ____________________________________

    USDA Mad Cow Coverup Unravels

    I now realize that there may never again be a
    confirmed case of Mad Cow Disease during the
    George Bush Administration. Oh, the diseased
    animals are out there, but in the name of
    homeland security, we are being "protected"
    in this Orwell-like twenty first century by
    rulers who think we need sheltering. We may
    never know the true reason that Ann Veneman
    resigned her post as USDA's boss the day
    after the latest Mad Cow incident began.
    Shortly before her (forced?) resignation,
    she remarked that her intention was to
    serve through a second term. Did she leave
    because she was ordered to fudge the Mad Cow
    results? I've discovered new evidence that
    is quite suggestive of a continuing coverup.
    You be the judge, as I reveal disturbing
    new information in this column.

    The problem with lying, is that many lies
    have to be told to cover up the original lie,
    so that the liar often forgets to protect
    the original lie.

    Records show that after USDA concluded that the
    pre-Thanksgiving cow was not a Mad Cow, they then
    began to test an unprecedented number of other
    cows. Had the test come back negative, USDA would
    logically have gone back to previous test levels.
    Instead, significantly more animals were tested.

    During that ten week period prior to the discovery
    of America's latest case of Mad Cow Disease, the
    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
    examined the brains of 60,655 slaughtered creatures.
    That's an average of 6,066 per week.

    During that one week period of discovery (11/15-11/21),
    USDA tested 7,900 cows, an increase of 1,835 over
    the previous ten week average. Such a dramatic increase
    makes sense, of course, but what followed after
    USDA's "safe" conclusion contradicts USDA's lie.

    Once USDA fudged the results, I anxiously awaited
    the following week's data. Was USDA telling the
    truth? If so, it would have been logical to return
    to the previous test level of 6,066 tested animals
    per week. If USDA officials were more concerned
    than they let on, the test numbers would be close
    or would exceed the key week's 7,900 level.

    Here are the results.

    During the Thanksgiving week of November 22-November 28,
    how many cows were tested for Mad Cow Disease? Most of
    America enjoyed two weekdays days off of work, plus a
    weekend. A shortened four day work week had to have
    resulted in fewer animals being tested, particularly
    after USDA's big lie. So, from 11/22-11/28, just 5,878
    animals were tested. If USDA had been telling the truth,
    the following week's testing would have reverted to
    the running 6,000 average or lower. If USDA had fudged
    the test data, the following week's data would
    have jumped through the roof. So I waited. And watched.

    Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
    12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:

    <http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_results.html >

    Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >

    The numbers do not lie. They expose USDA's lie.
    Over 9,000 cows were tested last week by concerned
    USDA regulators. An increase of fifty-five percent!
    Had there been no mad cow, the numbers would have
    been much lower, not 55% higher. More cows were
    tested because the cow was positive for Mad Cow.
    USDA lied to America to protect cattlemen.

    Only USDA's Department of Enlightenment (Propaganda)
    lies. Mad Cow is here, and in order to do damage control,
    insiders are in a panic, testing more animals to prevent
    the coming plague. Why test more animals? Because USDA
    confirmed that the original animal tested positive. Had
    it not, USDA most certainly would have returned to routine
    testing. They are now in an accelerated testing mode
    for good reason. It's here...

    Mad Cow Testing Timeline

    During that ten week period prior to November 18th, 2004,
    USDA tested 60,660 cows for Mad Cow Disease, or an average
    of 6,066 per week, or an average of 867 cows per day.
    _________________________________________________
    November 15, 2004-Oklahoma Cow suspected of Mad Cow Disease
    November 16, 2004-USDA Secretary Ann Veneman Resigns
    November 17, 2004
    November 18, 2004-USDA First announces positive Mad Cow Test
    November 19, 2004
    November 20, 2004**(X=1129 cows tested each day this week)
    November 21, 2004
    _________________________________________________
    November 22, 2004
    November 23, 2004-USDA Announces 7900 Cows Tested 11/15-11/21
    November 24, 2004-USDA Announces no Mad Cow Disease
    November 25, 2004-Traditional Day Off Before Thanksgiving
    November 26, 2004-Thanksgiving Day
    November 27, 2004
    November 28, 2004**(X=839 cows tested each day this week)
    _________________________________________________
    November 29, 2004
    November 30, 2004-USDA Announces 5878 Cows Tested 11/22-11/28
    December 01, 2004
    December 02, 2004
    December 03, 2004**(X=1301 cows tested each day this week)
    December 04, 2004
    December 05, 2004
    _________________________________________________
    December 06, 2004
    December 07, 2004-USDA Announces 9110 Cows Tested 11/29-12/5

    Had the original cow tested negative, USDA would have
    shifted their testing procedures into neutral, or
    into a lower gear. Instead, they now have their
    accelerator to the floor in the highest gear in
    their history. That's because they know the truth,
    and it's panic time at USDA. Now that the truth be
    known, do not expect future numbers to be true.
    They will fudge their future results. This time
    atound they were caught with their pants down.
    How can you be sure? Do not drink the milk. Do
    not eat the meat.

    Bottom line: After lying to America, USDA increased
    their testing from 839 cows per day to 1301 cows per
    day, an increase of 55%! Such an increase reflects
    extremely concerned bureaucrats. The numbers do not lie.
    The lies come from the dishonest bureaucrats in America's
    new elite who think that we need protection from ourselves.

    Robert Cohen
    http://www.notmilk.com

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...>
    Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:56 am
    Subject: Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human News notmilk2002
    Offline
    Send Email

    Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human Disease News

    In November of 2004, I wrote a series of columns
    regarding USDA's Second Mad Cow Disease coverup.
    USDA denied, as I provided evidence that they lied.
    This last week of June, 2005, USDA has admitted
    that they lied. So what else is new? As a result of
    USDA's clever brainwashing, Americans no longer
    give a damn. At the conclusion of this column,
    I'll include my astounding November, 2004 column.
    Meanwhile...back at the farm...

    When the subject is Mad Cow Disease,
    consumers no longer give a damn.

    The day after America's second Mad Cow was confirmed,
    cattle futures soared 70 cents per pound on strong
    trading. Cattlemen now know that meat-eaters don't
    really care about Mad Cow Disease.

    What's next?

    A new test for Mad Cow Disese has been developed by
    Vacci-Test Corporation. The new test requires just one
    drop of blood from a suspected cow. That assay will
    determine whether the suspect animal has a neurological
    disorder. The test will cost about $20 per cow, which
    should add about two cents to a meat-eater's next burger.

    Coming Soon: A test for Mad Human Disease?
    ____________________________________
    My Mad Cow Column of November 20, 2004
    ____________________________________

    USDA Mad Cow Coverup Unravels

    I now realize that there may never again be a
    confirmed case of Mad Cow Disease during the
    George Bush Administration. Oh, the diseased
    animals are out there, but in the name of
    homeland security, we are being "protected"
    in this Orwell-like twenty first century by
    rulers who think we need sheltering. We may
    never know the true reason that Ann Veneman
    resigned her post as USDA's boss the day
    after the latest Mad Cow incident began.
    Shortly before her (forced?) resignation,
    she remarked that her intention was to
    serve through a second term. Did she leave
    because she was ordered to fudge the Mad Cow
    results? I've discovered new evidence that
    is quite suggestive of a continuing coverup.
    You be the judge, as I reveal disturbing
    new information in this column.

    The problem with lying, is that many lies
    have to be told to cover up the original lie,
    so that the liar often forgets to protect
    the original lie.

    Records show that after USDA concluded that the
    pre-Thanksgiving cow was not a Mad Cow, they then
    began to test an unprecedented number of other
    cows. Had the test come back negative, USDA would
    logically have gone back to previous test levels.
    Instead, significantly more animals were tested.

    During that ten week period prior to the discovery
    of America's latest case of Mad Cow Disease, the
    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
    examined the brains of 60,655 slaughtered creatures.
    That's an average of 6,066 per week.

    During that one week period of discovery (11/15-11/21),
    USDA tested 7,900 cows, an increase of 1,835 over
    the previous ten week average. Such a dramatic increase
    makes sense, of course, but what followed after
    USDA's "safe" conclusion contradicts USDA's lie.

    Once USDA fudged the results, I anxiously awaited
    the following week's data. Was USDA telling the
    truth? If so, it would have been logical to return
    to the previous test level of 6,066 tested animals
    per week. If USDA officials were more concerned
    than they let on, the test numbers would be close
    or would exceed the key week's 7,900 level.

    Here are the results.

    During the Thanksgiving week of November 22-November 28,
    how many cows were tested for Mad Cow Disease? Most of
    America enjoyed two weekdays days off of work, plus a
    weekend. A shortened four day work week had to have
    resulted in fewer animals being tested, particularly
    after USDA's big lie. So, from 11/22-11/28, just 5,878
    animals were tested. If USDA had been telling the truth,
    the following week's testing would have reverted to
    the running 6,000 average or lower. If USDA had fudged
    the test data, the following week's data would
    have jumped through the roof. So I waited. And watched.

    Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
    12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:


    <http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_results
    ..html >

    Quoted message said:


    Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >

    The numbers do not lie. They expose USDA's lie.
    Over 9,000 cows were tested last week by concerned
    USDA regulators. An increase of fifty-five percent!
    Had there been no mad cow, the numbers would have
    been much lower, not 55% higher. More cows were
    tested because the cow was positive for Mad Cow.
    USDA lied to America to protect cattlemen.

    Only USDA's Department of Enlightenment (Propaganda)
    lies. Mad Cow is here, and in order to do damage control,
    insiders are in a panic, testing more animals to prevent
    the coming plague. Why test more animals? Because USDA
    confirmed that the original animal tested positive. Had
    it not, USDA most certainly would have returned to routine
    testing. They are now in an accelerated testing mode
    for good reason. It's here...

    Mad Cow Testing Timeline

    During that ten week period prior to November 18th, 2004,
    USDA tested 60,660 cows for Mad Cow Disease, or an average
    of 6,066 per week, or an average of 867 cows per day.
    _________________________________________________
    November 15, 2004-Oklahoma Cow suspected of Mad Cow Disease
    November 16, 2004-USDA Secretary Ann Veneman Resigns
    November 17, 2004
    November 18, 2004-USDA First announces positive Mad Cow Test
    November 19, 2004
    November 20, 2004**(X=1129 cows tested each day this week)
    November 21, 2004
    _________________________________________________
    November 22, 2004
    November 23, 2004-USDA Announces 7900 Cows Tested


    11/15-11/21

    Quoted message said:

    November 24, 2004-USDA Announces no Mad Cow Disease
    November 25, 2004-Traditional Day Off Before Thanksgiving
    November 26, 2004-Thanksgiving Day
    November 27, 2004
    November 28, 2004**(X=839 cows tested each day this week)
    _________________________________________________
    November 29, 2004
    November 30, 2004-USDA Announces 5878 Cows Tested


    11/22-11/28

    Quoted message said:

    December 01, 2004
    December 02, 2004
    December 03, 2004**(X=1301 cows tested each day this week)
    December 04, 2004
    December 05, 2004
    _________________________________________________
    December 06, 2004
    December 07, 2004-USDA Announces 9110 Cows Tested 11/29-12/5

    Had the original cow tested negative, USDA would have
    shifted their testing procedures into neutral, or
    into a lower gear. Instead, they now have their
    accelerator to the floor in the highest gear in
    their history. That's because they know the truth,
    and it's panic time at USDA. Now that the truth be
    known, do not expect future numbers to be true.
    They will fudge their future results. This time
    atound they were caught with their pants down.
    How can you be sure? Do not drink the milk. Do
    not eat the meat.

    Bottom line: After lying to America, USDA increased
    their testing from 839 cows per day to 1301 cows per
    day, an increase of 55%! Such an increase reflects
    extremely concerned bureaucrats. The numbers do not lie.
    The lies come from the dishonest bureaucrats in America's
    new elite who think that we need protection from ourselves.

    Thank you Robert... I weaned myself off of milk two years
    ago, then yogurt last year, now it looks like beef this year.

    Fortunately I am coming to like salads, fruit and fish a lot.

    and you are right also about the 'new elite'...here in calif
    we retire our police, prison guards, Sherifs and highway
    patrol at 90% of last years income...but then many fudge that
    by means of there associates taking paid sick time off so they
    can earn 130k or so in their last year and retire at age 51
    and 10k a month.. the citizens that pay the tax supporting
    that average a tenth of that.

    Such a mess is not sustainable.

    Phil Scott

    Quoted message said:


    Robert Cohen
    http://www.notmilk.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.