General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Low vitamin D associated with increased cancer

Started by Juhana Harju · · Last activity · 3 posts · 240 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 April 2006
Last activity
5 April 2006
Original author
Juhana Harju
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
240
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Low levels of vitamin D is associated with increased cancer risk and vice
    versa. The full study is available also.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 98, No. 7, 451-459, April 5,
    2006

    Prospective Study of Predictors of Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence and
    Mortality in Men
    Edward Giovannucci, Yan Liu, Eric B. Rimm, Bruce W. Hollis, Charles S.
    Fuchs, Meir J. Stampfer, Walter C. Willett

    Affiliations of authors: Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine,
    Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (EG,
    EBR, CSF, MJS, WCW); Department of Nutrition (EG, YL, EBR, MJS, WCW),
    Department of Epidemiology (EG, EBR, MJS, WCW), Harvard School of Public
    Health, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South
    Carolina, Charleston, SC (BWH); Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber
    Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (CSF)

    Correspondence to: Edward Giovannucci, MD, ScD, Harvard School of Public
    Health, 665 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail:
    [email hidden]).

    Background: Vitamin D has potent anticancer properties, especially against
    digestive-system cancers. Many human studies have used geographic residence
    as a marker of solar ultraviolet B and hence vitamin D exposure. Here, we
    considered multiple determinants of vitamin D exposure (dietary and
    supplementary vitamin D, skin pigmentation, adiposity, geographic residence,
    and leisure-time physical activity-to estimate sunlight exposure) in
    relation to cancer risk in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study.
    Methods: Among 1095 men of this cohort, we quantified the relation of these
    six determinants to plasma 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] level by use of a
    multiple linear regression model. We used results from the model to compute
    a predicted 25(OH)D level for each of 47 800 men in the cohort based on
    these characteristics. We then prospectively examined this variable in
    relation to cancer risk with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
    Results: From 1986 through January 31, 2000, we documented 4286 incident
    cancers (excluding organ-confined prostate cancer and nonmelanoma skin
    cancer) and 2025 deaths from cancer. From multivariable models, an increment
    of 25 nmol/L in predicted 25(OH)D level was associated with a 17% reduction
    in total cancer incidence (multivariable relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95%
    confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.92), a 29% reduction in total cancer
    mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.83), and a 45% reduction in
    digestive-system cancer mortality (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.74). The
    absolute annual rate of total cancer was 758 per 100 000 men in the bottom
    decile of predicted 25(OH)D and 674 per 100 000 men for the top decile;
    these respective rates were 326 per 100 000 and 277 per 100 000 for total
    cancer mortality and 128 per 100 000 and 78 per 100 000 for digestive-system
    cancer mortality. Results were similar when we controlled further for body
    mass index or physical activity level. Conclusions: Low levels of vitamin D
    may be associated with increased cancer incidence and mortality in men,
    particularly for digestive-system cancers. The vitamin D supplementation
    necessary to achieve a 25(OH)D increment of 25 nmol/L may be at least 1500
    IU/day.

    http://tinyurl.com/hhkh5

    --
    Juhana

  2. We never hear about vitamin. I just watched a report about it
    yesterday. This is serious thing. Check this out:

    <div style="width:300px;text-align:center;"><a
    href="http://www.groundhog.tv/apps/editor/staticplayer.jsp?clip=1144261768428.wmv"><img
    src="http://www.groundhog.tv/apps/editor/clippings/1144261768428.jpg"
    width="120" height="90" border="0"/><br/><img border="0"
    src="http://www.groundhog.tv/images/viewer/vpPlaySmall.gif"></a></a><br/>be
    careful</div>

  3. [email hidden] wrote:

    : We never hear about vitamin. I just watched a report about it
    : yesterday. This is serious thing. Check this out:
    :
    : <div style="width:300px;text-align:center;"><a
    :
    href="http://www.groundhog.tv/apps/editor/staticplayer.jsp?clip=1144261768428.wmv"><img

    Indeed. Otherwise very good report but the dosages were faulty. The report
    spoke about milligrams where as it should have been IU:s.

    : width="120" height="90" border="0"/><br/><img border="0"
    :
    src="http://www.groundhog.tv/images/viewer/vpPlaySmall.gif"></a></a><br/>be
    : careful</div>

    This link was broken and I was not able to repair it.

    --
    Juhana

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.