General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Low-fat diet largely pointless: new study

Started by TC · · Last activity · 1 post · 273 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
9 February 2006
Last activity
9 February 2006
Original author
TC
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
273
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=72122&version=1&template_id=43&parent_id=19

    Low-fat diet largely pointless: new studyPublished: Thursday, 9
    February, 2006, 10:16 AM Doha Time

    WASHINGTON: It turns out that all the suffering and privation could
    have been in vain.
    A major new health study released here yesterday showed that older
    women, who have forsworn juicy steaks in favour of lettuce leaves in
    hopes of avoiding cancer, heart disease or stroke, have precious little
    to show for their sacrifice.
    "Just switching to low-fat foods is not likely to yield much health
    benefit in most women," said Marcia Stefanick, professor of medicine
    at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, who participated in the
    study being published in the February 8 issue of the Journal of the
    American Medical Association.
    The iconoclastic report, which appears to debunk most popular dieting
    theories, says following an eating pattern lower in total fat did not
    significantly reduce the incidence of breast cancer, heart disease or
    stroke - and did not lower the risk of colorectal cancer in healthy
    postmenopausal women.
    True, the 48,835 women aged 50-79, who reduced their total fat intake,
    had a 9% lower risk of breast cancer than did women who made no dietary
    changes, scientists said.
    But the difference was not large enough to be statistically
    significant, which means it could have been due to chance, concluded
    the researchers, whose work on the subject spanned an eight-year period
    in the 1990s.
    For instance, in a group of 10,000 women, 42 in the low-fat diet group
    developed breast cancer each year, compared with 45 in the group
    maintaining their regular eating patterns.
    Women in both groups started at 35-38% of calories from fat, but then
    their paths diverged. By the end of the first year, the low-fat diet
    group reduced average total fat intakes to 24% of calories from fat,
    but did not meet the studys goal of 20%.
    At year six, the low-fat dieters were consuming 29% of calories from
    fat and increased their consumption of vegetables, fruits and grains.
    The comparison group averaged 35% of calories from fat at year one and
    37% at year six. - AFP

    *********

    TC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.