General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Low-Cal Diet Cuts Aging

Started by George Cherry · · Last activity · 5 posts · 204 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 April 2006
Last activity
5 April 2006
Original author
George Cherry
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
204
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Researchers Say Low-Cal Diet Cuts Aging
    By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
    1 hour agoUPDATED 1 HOUR 14 MINUTES AGO

    CHICAGO - Longevity researchers say they've shown for the first time that
    following a strict low-calorie diet can decrease DNA damage linked with
    aging.

    Some people who took part in the six-month diet study ate as little as 890
    calories a day. Their insulin levels fell and metabolisms slowed _ changes
    that are thought to increase longevity.

    The findings are provocative, but preliminary. Longer-term research will try
    to sort out whether such changes can meaningfully extend people's lives,
    said senior author Eric Ravussin of the Pennington Biomedical Research
    Center at Louisiana State University.

    "They are the first proof that what has been observed in rodents seems to be
    also working in humans," Ravussin said.

    The results are from the first phase of research at the Baton Rouge center
    sponsored by a $12.4 million National Institute on Aging grant. They follow
    unrelated research reported in January which suggested a very restrictive
    diet seemed to help the heart age more slowly.

    The latest study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical
    Association.

    "It's very exciting," said Dr. Evan Hadley, director of the NIA's geriatrics
    and clinical gerontology program.

    "It's a step forward but not the whole journey," said Hadley, whose agency
    is part of the NIH.

    The 48 participants, all slightly overweight, were randomly assigned to one
    of four groups: calorie restriction, which cut usual daily calories by 25
    percent; calorie restriction plus exercise, which cut daily calories by 12.5
    percent and increased physical activity by 12.5 percent five days a week;
    very low calories, with an 890-calorie liquid diet for up to about three
    months followed by a weight-maintenance diet; and a control group that aimed
    to keep weight steady.

    Government dietary guidelines for weight maintenance recommend about 2,000
    to 3,000 calories a day, depending on age, gender and activity level, with
    the higher amount generally for very active men.

    The non-liquid diets used in the study were high in fruits and vegetables
    with less than 30 percent fat.

    Average weight loss was about 18 pounds, slightly more in the liquid-diet
    group.

    Blood tests showed substantial decreases in the amount of age-related DNA
    damage in each of the three dieting groups, compared with their initial
    levels. That kind of microscopic damage is linked to cancer and other
    age-related ailments, but it's unknown whether the small changes seen in the
    study would affect the study volunteers' disease risks.

    No changes were seen in the control group.

    Insulin levels also decreased after six months in all three reduced calorie
    groups. Core body temperature also dipped slightly in two low-calorie groups
    but not in the liquid-diet or control group.

    The results show that the diets are safe, and not impossible to follow,
    Hadley said.

    Kacy Collins, 34, a once sedentary Baton Rouge law clerk, said she joined
    the study to lose weight and hoped that would reduce her risks for
    age-related ailments that run in her family, including diabetes and heart
    disease.

    Assigned to the exercise group, Collins said the hardest part was
    eliminating most sweets and exercising daily. But she said eating up to
    seven servings of fruits and vegetables daily kept her feeling full. She has
    stuck with the new habits and kept off most of the nearly 30 pounds she lost
    since the study ended almost two years ago.

    Collins said it will be a big bonus if the changes help her live longer,
    too.

    ___

    On the Net:

    JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

    Pennington research: http://calerie.pbrc.edu/pressrelease.html

    Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
    not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4875614.stm

  3. Of all the possible ways of slowing down ageing, this has got to be one of
    the most unappealing. I mean having to cut down on what you eat when there's
    all that delicious food out there!

    "George Cherry" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Researchers Say Low-Cal Diet Cuts Aging
    By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
    1 hour agoUPDATED 1 HOUR 14 MINUTES AGO

    CHICAGO - Longevity researchers say they've shown for the first time that
    following a strict low-calorie diet can decrease DNA damage linked with
    aging.

    Some people who took part in the six-month diet study ate as little as 890
    calories a day. Their insulin levels fell and metabolisms slowed _ changes
    that are thought to increase longevity.

    The findings are provocative, but preliminary. Longer-term research will
    try to sort out whether such changes can meaningfully extend people's
    lives, said senior author Eric Ravussin of the Pennington Biomedical
    Research Center at Louisiana State University.

    "They are the first proof that what has been observed in rodents seems to
    be also working in humans," Ravussin said.

    The results are from the first phase of research at the Baton Rouge center
    sponsored by a $12.4 million National Institute on Aging grant. They
    follow unrelated research reported in January which suggested a very
    restrictive diet seemed to help the heart age more slowly.

    The latest study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical
    Association.

    "It's very exciting," said Dr. Evan Hadley, director of the NIA's
    geriatrics and clinical gerontology program.

    "It's a step forward but not the whole journey," said Hadley, whose agency
    is part of the NIH.

    The 48 participants, all slightly overweight, were randomly assigned to
    one of four groups: calorie restriction, which cut usual daily calories by
    25 percent; calorie restriction plus exercise, which cut daily calories by
    12.5 percent and increased physical activity by 12.5 percent five days a
    week; very low calories, with an 890-calorie liquid diet for up to about
    three months followed by a weight-maintenance diet; and a control group
    that aimed to keep weight steady.

    Government dietary guidelines for weight maintenance recommend about 2,000
    to 3,000 calories a day, depending on age, gender and activity level, with
    the higher amount generally for very active men.

    The non-liquid diets used in the study were high in fruits and vegetables
    with less than 30 percent fat.

    Average weight loss was about 18 pounds, slightly more in the liquid-diet
    group.

    Blood tests showed substantial decreases in the amount of age-related DNA
    damage in each of the three dieting groups, compared with their initial
    levels. That kind of microscopic damage is linked to cancer and other
    age-related ailments, but it's unknown whether the small changes seen in
    the study would affect the study volunteers' disease risks.

    No changes were seen in the control group.

    Insulin levels also decreased after six months in all three reduced
    calorie groups. Core body temperature also dipped slightly in two
    low-calorie groups but not in the liquid-diet or control group.

    The results show that the diets are safe, and not impossible to follow,
    Hadley said.

    Kacy Collins, 34, a once sedentary Baton Rouge law clerk, said she joined
    the study to lose weight and hoped that would reduce her risks for
    age-related ailments that run in her family, including diabetes and heart
    disease.

    Assigned to the exercise group, Collins said the hardest part was
    eliminating most sweets and exercising daily. But she said eating up to
    seven servings of fruits and vegetables daily kept her feeling full. She
    has stuck with the new habits and kept off most of the nearly 30 pounds
    she lost since the study ended almost two years ago.

    Collins said it will be a big bonus if the changes help her live longer,
    too.

    ___

    On the Net:

    JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

    Pennington research: http://calerie.pbrc.edu/pressrelease.html

    Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
    may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  4. I would not expect the kind of benefits fruit flies get from calorie
    restriction. However, the study is interesting

    Reducing my calories on low carb, has improved my health. I like to blame
    low carb, but the restricted calories may actually be the reason.

    I feel the US food supply and its standards are screwed up. Chances are
    eating half the quantity of food reduces toxins by as much. Perhaps the
    body/liver is better able to handle the reduced toxin input.

    "George Cherry" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Researchers Say Low-Cal Diet Cuts Aging
    By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
    1 hour agoUPDATED 1 HOUR 14 MINUTES AGO

    CHICAGO - Longevity researchers say they've shown for the first time that
    following a strict low-calorie diet can decrease DNA damage linked with
    aging.

    Some people who took part in the six-month diet study ate as little as 890
    calories a day. Their insulin levels fell and metabolisms slowed _ changes
    that are thought to increase longevity.

    The findings are provocative, but preliminary. Longer-term research will


    try

    Quoted message said:

    to sort out whether such changes can meaningfully extend people's lives,
    said senior author Eric Ravussin of the Pennington Biomedical Research
    Center at Louisiana State University.

    "They are the first proof that what has been observed in rodents seems to


    be

    Quoted message said:

    also working in humans," Ravussin said.

    The results are from the first phase of research at the Baton Rouge center
    sponsored by a $12.4 million National Institute on Aging grant. They


    follow

    Quoted message said:

    unrelated research reported in January which suggested a very restrictive
    diet seemed to help the heart age more slowly.

    The latest study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical
    Association.

    "It's very exciting," said Dr. Evan Hadley, director of the NIA's


    geriatrics

    Quoted message said:

    and clinical gerontology program.

    "It's a step forward but not the whole journey," said Hadley, whose agency
    is part of the NIH.

    The 48 participants, all slightly overweight, were randomly assigned to


    one

    Quoted message said:

    of four groups: calorie restriction, which cut usual daily calories by 25
    percent; calorie restriction plus exercise, which cut daily calories by


    12.5

    Quoted message said:

    percent and increased physical activity by 12.5 percent five days a week;
    very low calories, with an 890-calorie liquid diet for up to about three
    months followed by a weight-maintenance diet; and a control group that


    aimed

    Quoted message said:

    to keep weight steady.

    Government dietary guidelines for weight maintenance recommend about 2,000
    to 3,000 calories a day, depending on age, gender and activity level, with
    the higher amount generally for very active men.

    The non-liquid diets used in the study were high in fruits and vegetables
    with less than 30 percent fat.

    Average weight loss was about 18 pounds, slightly more in the liquid-diet
    group.

    Blood tests showed substantial decreases in the amount of age-related DNA
    damage in each of the three dieting groups, compared with their initial
    levels. That kind of microscopic damage is linked to cancer and other
    age-related ailments, but it's unknown whether the small changes seen in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    study would affect the study volunteers' disease risks.

    No changes were seen in the control group.

    Insulin levels also decreased after six months in all three reduced


    calorie

    Quoted message said:

    groups. Core body temperature also dipped slightly in two low-calorie


    groups

    Quoted message said:

    but not in the liquid-diet or control group.

    The results show that the diets are safe, and not impossible to follow,
    Hadley said.

    Kacy Collins, 34, a once sedentary Baton Rouge law clerk, said she joined
    the study to lose weight and hoped that would reduce her risks for
    age-related ailments that run in her family, including diabetes and heart
    disease.

    Assigned to the exercise group, Collins said the hardest part was
    eliminating most sweets and exercising daily. But she said eating up to
    seven servings of fruits and vegetables daily kept her feeling full. She


    has

    Quoted message said:

    stuck with the new habits and kept off most of the nearly 30 pounds she


    lost

    Quoted message said:

    since the study ended almost two years ago.

    Collins said it will be a big bonus if the changes help her live longer,
    too.

    ___

    On the Net:

    JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

    Pennington research: http://calerie.pbrc.edu/pressrelease.html

    Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material


    may

    Quoted message said:

    not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  5. "George Cherry" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Researchers Say Low-Cal Diet Cuts Aging
    By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
    1 hour agoUPDATED 1 HOUR 14 MINUTES AGO

    CHICAGO - Longevity researchers say they've shown for the first time that
    following a strict low-calorie diet can decrease DNA damage linked with
    aging.

    Some people who took part in the six-month diet study ate as little as 890
    calories a day. Their insulin levels fell and metabolisms slowed _ changes
    that are thought to increase longevity.

    The findings are provocative, but preliminary. Longer-term research will
    try to sort out whether such changes can meaningfully extend people's
    lives, said senior author Eric Ravussin of the Pennington Biomedical
    Research Center at Louisiana State University.

    "They are the first proof that what has been observed in rodents seems to
    be also working in humans," Ravussin said.

    The results are from the first phase of research at the Baton Rouge center
    sponsored by a $12.4 million National Institute on Aging grant. They
    follow unrelated research reported in January which suggested a very
    restrictive diet seemed to help the heart age more slowly.

    The latest study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical
    Association.

    "It's very exciting," said Dr. Evan Hadley, director of the NIA's
    geriatrics and clinical gerontology program.

    "It's a step forward but not the whole journey," said Hadley, whose agency
    is part of the NIH.

    The 48 participants, all slightly overweight, were randomly assigned to
    one of four groups: calorie restriction, which cut usual daily calories by
    25 percent; calorie restriction plus exercise, which cut daily calories by
    12.5 percent and increased physical activity by 12.5 percent five days a
    week; very low calories, with an 890-calorie liquid diet for up to about
    three months followed by a weight-maintenance diet; and a control group
    that aimed to keep weight steady.

    Government dietary guidelines for weight maintenance recommend about 2,000
    to 3,000 calories a day, depending on age, gender and activity level, with
    the higher amount generally for very active men.

    The non-liquid diets used in the study were high in fruits and vegetables
    with less than 30 percent fat.

    Average weight loss was about 18 pounds, slightly more in the liquid-diet
    group.

    Blood tests showed substantial decreases in the amount of age-related DNA
    damage in each of the three dieting groups, compared with their initial
    levels. That kind of microscopic damage is linked to cancer and other
    age-related ailments, but it's unknown whether the small changes seen in
    the study would affect the study volunteers' disease risks.

    No changes were seen in the control group.

    Insulin levels also decreased after six months in all three reduced
    calorie groups. Core body temperature also dipped slightly in two
    low-calorie groups but not in the liquid-diet or control group.

    The results show that the diets are safe, and not impossible to follow,
    Hadley said.

    Kacy Collins, 34, a once sedentary Baton Rouge law clerk, said she joined
    the study to lose weight and hoped that would reduce her risks for
    age-related ailments that run in her family, including diabetes and heart
    disease.

    Assigned to the exercise group, Collins said the hardest part was
    eliminating most sweets and exercising daily. But she said eating up to
    seven servings of fruits and vegetables daily kept her feeling full. She
    has stuck with the new habits and kept off most of the nearly 30 pounds
    she lost since the study ended almost two years ago.

    Collins said it will be a big bonus if the changes help her live longer,
    too.

    ___

    On the Net:

    JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

    Pennington research: http://calerie.pbrc.edu/pressrelease.html

    Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
    may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Very interesting. Now I thought under 1,200 calories a day was unhealthy?
    Now they are saying it's healthy? Epidemiologists are kinda dumb.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.