Dan Volker said:Quoted message said:You're so full of [censored]...
First, bomba, if anyone here is full of [censored], its a
newsgroup poser like yourself, who enjoys hurling insults
over the net, that would have you toothless in real life.
We've been here before. I rarely hurl insults, but I do
believe in a certain level of honesty. If you talk [censored] or
post idiotic comments then I'll call you on it. I expect the
same in return.
Secondly, I don't know where you get the idea that I'd be
toothless in 'real life'. As I mentioned before when you
posted some of your other baseless [censored], I'd quite happily
call you on it if we were chatting over a couple of beers.
Quoted message said:Because I don't want to buy in to the ss cult, or your own
version of what is the ultimate in mountain biking, you
start humping my leg.
You've missed the point (again). This isn't about my views
about mountain biking, it's about yours. You consistently
spout your rather uninformed opinions as fact, and it comes
across badly.
Now, if you'd said something along the lines of: 'I also
come from a roadie background, ride in Florida and find a
full suspension bike to be the best for my local trails'
then we wouldn't be having this debate. Instead, you pushed
your 'ultimate version of mountain biking' by telling the OP
of "the best way" to enjoy their mountain biking.
Oh, and you really should work out what 'leg-humping' is.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:obstacles with less need for finesse, and allow you to
have fun
immediately.
Quoted message said:
Man, I can't wait to trade in my hardtails and rigid
bikes so I can get a full suspension bike and start
having fun.
Spoken like a moron who is incapable of giving good advice
to a "roadie" who wants to get in to mountain biking.
No, spoken like a mountain biker who finds your comments
uninformed. There are a few problems I have with your
statements. Firstly, the idea that ploughing through
obstacles without finesse is a good thing, secondly, the
idea that you have to go fast to have fun, and finally the
implication that to achieve this speed and fun, you need a
big, expensive double boinger.
Quoted message said:Yeah, why don't you convince him he'll have lots of fun
riding technical trails his first week on a rigid ss bike.
What on earth are you talking about now?
Quoted message said:I know a lot of roadies, and I have seen how they take
to mountain biking on x-country bikes, versus the ones
who have gotten big travel bikes. Either you don't know
any, or you care more about having them see the world
your way , than you do about them enjoying their first
year of mountain biking. If they don't like their first
few days or weeks, what is to keep them even on their
new mountain bike?
Who cares? If they don't enjoy mountain-biking then they
shouldn't do it. I'm not here to convince people that don't
enjoy it, that mountain biking is the one true way. Either
they'll get it or they won't, and you most certainly do not
need specific kit to get it.
Quoted message said:Saddle them with a rigid, ss piece of [censored], and it will
almost guarantee they won't enjoy the sport long enough to
build skills--they'll be back on the road bike instead.
In which case, can I recommend a rigid SS for you?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Pfft! Why is the alternative to FS a 20lb whippet bike?
And why would a FS necessarily last longer than a well-
built 24lb hardtail?
Most road riders expect a good bike to be a "light bike".
Going from a 15 pound bike on the road, to a 20 pound
mountain bike will seem to many of them as a big jump in
weight and frame strength. They would have to have
"reasons" to want a heavier bike---whether it is a 24
pound hard tail or 30 pound all mountain full sus.
And I never said anything about the 24 pound hardtail not
lasting as long as the 30 pound "all mountain bike"
Which was my point. You weren't comparing like with like,
because it didn't suit your point of view. Comparing a 20lb
XC machine with a 30lb "all mountain bike" is not balanced.
I plucked 24lbs out of the ether, because that is a
reasonable weight for a strong HT and a better balance for
your comparison. Now how would you compare the long-term
reliability issues of said 24lb mtb with a 30lb "laz^H^H^H
all mountain bike"?
--
a.m-b FAQ: j-harris.netambfaq.htmOpen ↗
b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htmOpen ↗