Road Cycling · Public discussion

Look Cleats Breaking ?

Started by Richard Thompson · · Last activity · 94 posts · 2,034 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 May 2005
Last activity
25 May 2005
Original author
Richard Thompson
Posts
94
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,034
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 94
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Richard Thompson said:

    I suppose I could go back to using my trusty Cinneli pedals . They
    were called suicide pedals for a reason. I won them in a 3 day stage
    race back in the `70s.

    according to the report this kid died when his pedal pulled out (albeit
    it was a freak accident).

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/may05/may11news2

    (2nd story : wisconsin rider dies)

    Look pedals will put out if you pull up or back hard enough (you're
    only likely to do this on a steep hill or for a sudden acceleration),
    some other brands won't, simply because of the way the mechanism is
    designed.

    -Amit

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Kunich said:

    The older Look cleats have had their molds replaced many times over the
    years I would expect and have gotten progressively smaller and hence
    they rattle around in the pedal more than originally.

    Hmm, I'm not sure how replacing the molds would make the cleats smaller,
    unless they purposely designed the new molds to be smaller. They'd have the
    dimensions of the originals on file (Iwould hope!), and it would be a
    simple matter to duplicate those dimensions. Even the French know how to
    use calipers, micrometers and CMMs. I wonder if the newer cleats are made
    differently, have a different material composition that shrinks more than
    the original stuff as it sets up, or if the pedals are no longer then same
    size (due to wear, or being deformed).

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Butter is love.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  3. Sounds like you might have had the normal neuro exam and the normal CT but
    you did not have the dependable observer to take you home. In that case, I
    would think that they had not done things correctly. To jump to the idea
    that the cause was insurance status is a bit of a leap. Doctors, like other
    people, screw up on a fairly regular basis and sometimes it is difficult to
    see why. My sister, who has had a prior blood clot in her leg, presented to
    a ED with pain in that leg as well as chest pain and shortness of breath.
    These are classic signs of blood clot in the lungs, a potentially life
    threatening problem. She was, however, sent home after a very minimal
    evaluation and scheduled for a test to look for a clot in her leg the
    following day. Clearly this was wrong. It had nothing to do with insurance
    or economic status as the physicians and hospital stood to make a fair
    amount of money by doing the indicated testing that her insurance would have
    paid for easily. In my experience economics are a fairly poor motivator of
    individual decision making for physicians.

    --
    Mike Murray
    "Richard Thompson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It might be interesting to get Mike Murry and my soninlaw in a
    disscussion . Steve Rider my son in law is a nurologist, also a good
    biker, who is fanatic about cyclecross. I
    was a bit shocked after ct scan and Xrays at how quick the were through
    with me. Damn I was barefooted wearing bloody bike clothes, 25 miles
    from home. The loan of a phone did find a ride , but what if I had not .
    A taxi ? and I live alone in the woods. OK there is a house in woods.
    Son in law called the next morning to see if I woke. Guess Helmet did
    its job. I always have said ,,CARRY ID. its suprising
    how many bikers don`t . This time I was not riding alone. I often do 200
    mile rides with a tent, then ride back the next morning. We all might
    should tell some one where we are going to ride.

    @ @

    ~~~

  4. On Sun, 08 May 2005 23:36:48 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Richard Thompson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone had look cleats break while standing going up hill . Yep I did
    last sunday at 30 mph. Was a NASTY fall . Got a NOT FREE trip in
    ambulance to hospital. Head and neck checked hospital was done with me.
    Gee I was unconcious 45 min`s and they just take X rays and show me the
    door. Has anyone had a
    similar fall ? Richard

    No. Though I've seen a lot of Look cleats fail from wear and the owner not
    replacing them when necessary.

    I have to tell you, if you can go up hill standing at 30 mph you're in shape
    for the pros.

    I just had mine replaced for that reason, wear and tear, just in time
    for the new season. THe last pair I had did crack, but it was in an
    accident. I didn't notice until I got home. However, since i was
    injured and it was late in the season, that was kind of it for me.

    REcently, a guy I know had his STEM crack- while he was DESCENDING a
    hilly street. It didn't break, fortunately. ! He made it to his LBS
    and it turns out the bolt had been too tight. Needless to say he was
    just a tad rattled. He could have ended up looking like marinara
    sauce!

  5. Thanks Amit ,, I read the artical. Did not mention brand cleats
    used, but seems similar to my fall as I was sorta attacking on a short
    steep hill . Was told when cleat broke the loose foot hit pavement which
    shows by scrapes on shoe. Then it seems I hit head and about everyother
    part of me,,lol . But my cleat did not pull out, it broke in half. The
    front and rear of cleat did not break off. Oh well many bought new
    cleats since I fell or at least checked theirs.
    Richard

  6. At my request one local shop had new Look Cleats deliverd. They now
    make a thinner cleat. Thinner cleats have nothing to do with older molds
    being replaced. I agree the French can make accurate measuments. Simply
    look at Look web site. The Look Knockoff cleats do not have wear
    indicators or teflon as the newer Look Cleats do. I would not use the
    Knockoffs. Gee only a $5 saving.

    @ @

    ~~~

  7. Mike I agree I might should have not been alone that first nite. Guess I
    should either get married again or just rent out a few rooms. I did take
    a good wack on my head, Hmmmm could be the toughest part of my body. At
    least my daughter and son in law called the next morning.
    Blood clots are noting to ignore.
    Richard

  8. Blanshay I have seen falls caused by handlebars snapping in final
    sprints. nasty falls. Taylor Hogan had this happen in Tallahassy Fla
    Lucky for him he hit the curb ,,then soft grass.

    @ @

    ~~~

  9. It sounds as though you got a shoulder separation. The pain is likely
    to stick around for some time if that's the case. Mine took about a
    year to go away on the worst side. Six months or so for the other side.

  10. Howard,

    Because plastic shrinks the real cleat model which is used to produce
    the mold is made a little larger. Over the years they lose the original
    cleat model. Then, when renewing the mold they use a regular cleat as a
    model. If you use a cleat instead of the model the end result is that
    the new mold produces a cleat a little bit smaller. Then when the make
    a new mold from the new smaller cleat it comes out a little smaller
    again.

    There isn't much difference, only a percent or so, but over time it
    adds up and makes a smaller cleat. All you have to do is try using the
    old style cleat in a good look pedal and you can tell immediately that
    something is wrong. The latest cleats have obviously been made properly
    sized and the difference is instantly noticeable.

  11. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Howard,

    Because plastic shrinks the real cleat model which is used to produce
    the mold is made a little larger. Over the years they lose the original
    cleat model. Then, when renewing the mold they use a regular cleat as a
    model. If you use a cleat instead of the model the end result is that
    the new mold produces a cleat a little bit smaller. Then when the make
    a new mold from the new smaller cleat it comes out a little smaller
    again.

    Why would they do that instead of using the original specs they used for the
    initial molds?

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Kunich said:

    "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, for any kind of plastic item that is to be made in quantities
    greater than a few (say, one or two pieces), no molds are made from an
    existing item, like a cleat. The molds for a mass produced part are
    machined from at least two pieces of aluminum or other metal (a top and
    bottom for a very simple part), to many pieces for a complicated piece
    that
    has overhangs, pockets or other features.

    For crying out loud Howard - just look at the damned cleat - it is a
    straight draw mold. This is supposed to be a profitable item and so the
    molds are as cheap as they can be made.

    Indeed. But it's still going to be made the same way. They're going to
    be inexpensive but still effective. The point I was making is that the
    molds aren't made from an existing part, they're machined to dimensions on
    a drawing or CAD file. I'm going to be making a mold for a project I have
    soon, and take it to the plastic shop that used to be next door to my shop
    for production.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Butter is love.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  13. Tom Kunich said:

    Because it might cost $5,000 for the model to make the mold or even more in
    France. And the French, for those unaware of it, are some of the, uhhhh,
    thriftiest people I've ever met. One French company I worked for I got to
    work early in the morning and discovered the bosses wife washing out the
    paper coffee filters for reuse!!!

    And the moral of the story is: Don't buy French condoms (AKA freedom
    letters) ?

  14. Tom Kunich said:

    "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, for any kind of plastic item that is to be made in


    quantities

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    greater than a few (say, one or two pieces), no molds are made from


    an

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    existing item, like a cleat. The molds for a mass produced part are
    machined from at least two pieces of aluminum or other metal (a top


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bottom for a very simple part), to many pieces for a complicated


    piece

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that
    has overhangs, pockets or other features.

    For crying out loud Howard - just look at the damned cleat - it is a
    straight draw mold. This is supposed to be a profitable item and so


    the

    Quoted message said:

    molds are as cheap as they can be made.

    Hey Tom
    When I worked at Kellogg Brush as a mechanic and machine set-up guy
    they did things exactly the way Howard is describing with their molds
    and those were for things like brush handles which sell a lot for less
    than cleats. The only thing they did was to have a "library" of the
    prototype molds along with all the documentation as a reference in case
    they ever needed them. Since all the stuff they were making was pretty
    small this was no big deal to do and they were pretty picky about
    getting exactly what they wanted.
    I didn't work down in molding much so I don't know a lot of the
    details, but the system sounds exactly like what Howard is describing
    from talking to the engineers and mechanics down there.
    Bill C

  15. Mike Murray said:

    For the most part here in the US the
    crisis of people lacking medical insurance is primarily an issue of
    people electing NOT to purchase rather than being unable to purchase.

    Were that so, there'd be no need to call it a crisis. BTW,
    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/scpo/insured.png

  16. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Murray said:

    For the most part here in the US the
    crisis of people lacking medical insurance is primarily an issue of
    people electing NOT to purchase rather than being unable to purchase.

    Were that so, there'd be no need to call it a crisis. BTW,
    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/scpo/insured.png

    Here's the problem Robert - insurance companies have a great deal. Most of
    the insurance in this country is for the healthiest segment of the
    population - those working. Companies purchase health insurance policies and
    this allows insurance companies to overprice all of their other private
    insurance with the positive logic that those who aren't insured by company
    policies are those who can't work either from age or infirmity.

    Moreover, the US Government has made it very easy for companies because they
    can write off the insurance and workers aren't taxed on it.

    This is a BIG WIN for those who are healthy and of working age and it's [censored]
    poor for everyone else.

    The problem is, how do you put in place incentives for the insurance
    companies to broaden their membership policies.

    For one thing I wouldn't allow companies to write off health insurance.
    Secondly I wouldn't allow workers to obtain free medical policies without
    paying income tax on the hidden income.

    This would provide incentives for companies to simply pay workers a stipend
    for insurance coverage and it would provide insurance companies the horrible
    alternative of insuring 'neighborhood' groups like they do in Germany and
    some other European countries. This would mean that they set their insurance
    rates for a general population rather than the healthiest subset.

    Insurance companies need economic pressure to provide more general coverage,
    but of course it needs to be done within the framework of the Constitution.

  17. "Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, for any kind of plastic item that is to be made in


    quantities

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    greater than a few (say, one or two pieces), no molds are made from


    an

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    existing item, like a cleat. The molds for a mass produced part are
    machined from at least two pieces of aluminum or other metal (a top


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bottom for a very simple part), to many pieces for a complicated


    piece

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that
    has overhangs, pockets or other features.

    For crying out loud Howard - just look at the damned cleat - it is a
    straight draw mold. This is supposed to be a profitable item and so


    the

    Quoted message said:

    molds are as cheap as they can be made.

    Hey Tom
    When I worked at Kellogg Brush as a mechanic and machine set-up guy
    they did things exactly the way Howard is describing with their molds
    and those were for things like brush handles which sell a lot for less
    than cleats. The only thing they did was to have a "library" of the
    prototype molds along with all the documentation as a reference in case
    they ever needed them. Since all the stuff they were making was pretty
    small this was no big deal to do and they were pretty picky about
    getting exactly what they wanted.
    I didn't work down in molding much so I don't know a lot of the
    details, but the system sounds exactly like what Howard is describing
    from talking to the engineers and mechanics down there.
    Bill C

    The system is as Howard states except that when you don't have the file on
    the cleat you make one up by drawing it using a production cleat to measure
    from.

    Here's a question - I have a couple of new old-style cleats. These rattle in
    a new Look pedal but work OK in my old Shimano Look-type pedals.

    I bought the latest Look Delta cleats with the teflon inner areas and they
    click in solidly.

    Obviously there's a size difference here.

    Do you suppose that they made the new cleats larger? Or that the old style
    were originally undersized? Or that there's something in the process that
    changes over time?

  18. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Murray said:

    For the most part here in the US the
    crisis of people lacking medical insurance is primarily an issue of
    people electing NOT to purchase rather than being unable to purchase.

    Were that so, there'd be no need to call it a crisis. BTW,
    http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/scpo/insured.png

    BTW, what the hell do you think you're seeing with that graph?

  19. Obviously you got some that were out of spec. I have to wonder if
    they weren't outsourced to someone who wasn't as concerned about QC, or
    they tried a cheaper plastic. I'd be really surprised if the problem
    was in the molds at the plant Look had been making them at. We're never
    going to know exactly what caused it. I'm sure they figured it out
    pretty quickly, but they obviously weren't far enough out of spec to
    reprocess. It really wouldn't surprise me to find out that they were
    outsourced.
    Bill C

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Kunich said:

    The system is as Howard states except that when you don't have the file on
    the cleat you make one up by drawing it using a production cleat to measure
    from.

    Well, since the pedals (and, by extension, the accompanying cleat) are a
    mainstay of Look's business, I'd be pretty stunned to find out they don't
    have a drawing or CAD file on hand. Stranger things have happened, but
    still... Reverse engineering (aka "copying"😉 is exactly how someone would
    make unauthorized aftermarket ones. A smart engineer would know to increase
    the size because the shrink rates of the plastic are known (or ought to be).

    Quoted message said:

    Here's a question - I have a couple of new old-style cleats. These rattle in
    a new Look pedal but work OK in my old Shimano Look-type pedals.

    I bought the latest Look Delta cleats with the teflon inner areas and they
    click in solidly.

    Obviously there's a size difference here.

    Do you suppose that they made the new cleats larger? Or that the old style
    were originally undersized? Or that there's something in the process that
    changes over time?

    Possibly (as Bill suggested) they were outsourced to a different vendor.
    Or perhaps differences in material, heating rates prior to injection or
    pressure of the injection (there are a few other variables, but those are
    the main ones). The ones with the teflon inserts would be made from a very
    different mold, however, as putting the two different materials in the same
    finished piece is a two stage process.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Butter is love.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.