London start for 2007 TdF



On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:54:35 +0100, Dave Larrington wrote:

> Mike Causer wrote:
>> According to Cyclingnews.com quoting Het Nieuwsblad
>>
>>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/news/?id=/news/2005/jul05/jul06news5
>>
>> Article right at the bottom
>
> One rather wonder whether that will still be the case tomorrow, given
> recent events in Singapore...

The Grauniad think it will make no difference:

http://sport.guardian.co.uk/cycling/story/0,10482,1349612,00.html#article_continue


Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden. B*gger.



Mike
 
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.

Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
 
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>
>
> Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...

They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
expect.

Colin
 
Colin Blackburn wrote:
> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>
>>
>>
>> Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>
>
> They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
> expect.

Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
view of this.

R.
 
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:40:26 +0100, Richard wrote:
> Colin Blackburn wrote:
>> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>
>>
>> They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>> expect.
>
> Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
> view of this.

Are you positive? A potential flashpoint for a breakdown in relations, then.

--
Nobby
 
in message <[email protected]>, Richard
('[email protected]') wrote:

> Colin Blackburn wrote:
>> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:19:30 +0100, Mike Causer
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>
>>> Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>
>> They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>> expect.
>
> Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
> view of this.

Are you positive? Got your ear to the ground?

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
/-\ You have discovered a security flaw in a Microsoft product. You
|-| can report this issue to our security tesm. Would you like to
| | * Be completely ignored (default)?
| | * Receive a form email full of platitudes about how much we care?
\_/ * Spend hours helping us fix this problem for free?
 
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:40:26 +0100, Richard
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>> Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>> They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>> expect.
>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>view of this.

They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
have an alternate agenda?

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
 
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:40:26 +0100, Richard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>
>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>
>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>expect.
>>
>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>view of this.
>
>
> They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
> have an alternate agenda?

Their position is static, they will directly resist any change. There'll
be a lot of tension before long.
 
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:40:26 +0100, Richard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>
>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>
>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>expect.
>>
>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>view of this.
>
>
> They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
> have an alternate agenda?

Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
leave things in a state of flux.

R.
 
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:27:55 +0100, Richard
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>>expect.
>>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>>view of this.
>> They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
>> have an alternate agenda?
>Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
>leave things in a state of flux.

They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
of a volt-face?

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
 
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:27:55 +0100, Richard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>>>
>>>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>>>expect.
>>>>
>>>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>>>view of this.
>>>
>>>They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
>>>have an alternate agenda?
>>
>>Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
>>leave things in a state of flux.
>
>
> They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
> towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
> faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
> the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
> foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
> of a volt-face?
>
> Guy

I dont have the capacity to handle this.

come ohm guys
 
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:30:12 +1000, dave <[email protected]> wrote:

>Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:27:55 +0100, Richard
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>>>>expect.
>>>>>
>>>>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>>>>view of this.
>>>>
>>>>They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
>>>>have an alternate agenda?
>>>
>>>Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
>>>leave things in a state of flux.
>>
>>
>> They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
>> towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
>> faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
>> the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
>> foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
>> of a volt-face?
>>
>> Guy
>
>I dont have the capacity to handle this.
>
>come ohm guys

If you think this is the way to conduct a thread, you should be in a field of
good earth, somewhere. I'll join you in a mho.

God, the sheer frequency of these puns hertz. I oscillate between enjoying them
and groaning, but now it would take Henry VIII to induce me to read any more.
Time to coil up with a good book before I blow a fuse.
 
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:27:55 +0100, Richard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>Oh, hang on. They misspelled Leiden.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Probably had a few jars at lunchtime...
>>>>>
>>>>>They have quite a capacity for it. Still, they're on charge accounts I
>>>>>expect.
>>>>
>>>>Currently, yes, but I think that their regulators are taking a negative
>>>>view of this.
>>>
>>>They seem to have generated a bit of controversy, anyway. Maybe they
>>>have an alternate agenda?
>>
>>Certainly they express a potential difference in opinion, that could
>>leave things in a state of flux.
>
>
> They are insulated from reality, and that impedes their progress
> towards enlightenment. They should be inducted into cycles, even just
> faraday, but they will resist it because they think it hertz. Watts
> the fuss about, I want to know? Are they ampered by their
> foolishness? Or do they think inverting their view would be too much
> of a volt-face?

SI, senor.

I bow out gracefully to leave Guy triumphant on the field.

R.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
CW bullish about London start for 2007 TdF
Replies
21
Views
956
UK and Europe
MartinM
M
P
London to Brighton - best Sat night b+b near the start?
Replies
0
Views
406
UK and Europe
Paul Turner
P
D
london clubs with civilised ride start times?
Replies
3
Views
333
UK and Europe
Helen Deborah Vecht
H
S
Spots for ride london 2016!
Replies
0
Views
1K
UK and Europe
starfish11
S
Steve Dawson
Cycling In London
Replies
3
Views
2K
UK and Europe
Corzhens
Corzhens
Top Bottom Back