General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Lon Times: Thousands carrying hidden CJD timebomb

Started by Sufaud · · Last activity · 2 posts · 329 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 May 2004
Last activity
23 May 2004
Original author
Sufaud
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
329
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Times (London) May 21, 2004

    Thousands carrying hidden CJD timebomb

    By Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor

    Concealed infection could be passed on by blood or surgery

    BRITAIN is facing a variant-CJD timebomb with research
    published today suggesting that thousands of people across
    the country unknowingly carry the killer disease.

    In the largest study into potential effects of vCJD,
    scientists predict that up to 4,000 people may be infected
    by the agent responsible for the degenerative brain disease,
    which is the human form of mad cow disease.

    Some may already be passing it on through blood
    transfusions and contaminated surgical instruments, so that
    the disease may continue to kill for decades. Last night
    experts gave warning that the government-funded study,
    published today in the Journal of Pathology, might even
    have underestimated the threat.

    Pathologists who examined more than 12,500 specimens of
    tonsils and appendix removed in operations found evidence in
    three cases of the prion protein responsible for vCJD.

    If that proportion is repeated across the country, about
    3,800 people would be carrying the infective agent — far
    more than the 141 who have died of it so far. The samples
    were anonymous, so it is impossible to identify the three
    who tested positive.

    Most came from people aged between 20 and 29, the peak age
    for developing vCJD.

    "I find these results very concerning," Professor John
    Collinge, head of the Medical Research Council Prion Unit at
    St Mary's Hospital, London, said. "Our experience is that
    looking at appendix samples will underestimate the true
    picture. In addition, no test is 100 per cent effective, and
    you don't know at what stage in the incubation period the
    test will be positive."

    Professor James Ironside, senior pathologist at the National
    CJD Surveillance Unit in Edinburgh, who took part in the
    research, said: "There would seem to be more positives than
    you would expect. That may be because of genetic differences
    and susceptibility, but it may also be that you can have a
    sub-clinical infection which never progresses to produce
    symptoms — a ‘carrier state'.

    "The findings do have to be taken seriously. Generally one
    has to be cautious about interpreting these data, but they
    may indicate that there are people who are not infected in
    the normal way but could represent a source of infection."

    When vCJD first appeared in 1996, estimates of the number
    who might be infected ranged as high as 500,000. But as
    the number of cases has risen only slowly, the
    projections have fallen to somewhere between a few
    hundred and a few thousand.

    That people may be unwittingly carrying vCJD infection does
    not mean that they will get the disease. But even if it
    remains permanently in a sub-clinical state, there are
    alarming implications for surgery and blood transfusions.

    Carriers might pass on the infectious prion to those who
    are more susceptible through contaminated instruments or
    blood. Alternatively, the ultimate toll may rise higher
    because only those most susceptible have so far developed
    full symptoms.

    People with a particular genetic pattern are most
    susceptible to the disease and so far all the victims come
    from this group. But others may get it after a longer
    incubation period.

    Dr David Hilton, of the Department of Histopatho- logy at
    Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, who led the study, said:
    "Our findings need to be interpreted with caution, but
    cannot be discounted. There is still much to learn about
    vCJD, and presence of the protein in these tissue samples
    does not necessarily mean that those affected will go on
    to develop vCJD."

    Professor Collinge said that he thought the Government
    should look again at using disposable surgical instruments
    for operations that might involve a risk of transmission. A
    recommendation for the use of such instruments introduced
    in England was withdrawn about two years ago because of
    safety fears.

    The Department of Health said: "There is still much to learn
    about vCJD and this study is important for future research.
    The Department has put in place measures to reduce any risk
    of possible transmission of the disease via blood products
    and surgical instruments."

    timesonline.co.uk0,,174
    1117957,00.html

  2. (Sufaud) said:

    Times (London) May 21, 2004

    Thousands carrying hidden CJD timebomb

    By Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor

    Concealed infection could be passed on by blood or surgery

    BRITAIN is facing a variant-CJD timebomb with research
    published today suggesting that thousands of people across
    the country unknowingly carry the killer disease.

    In the largest study into potential effects of vCJD,
    scientists predict that up to 4,000 people may be infected
    by the agent responsible for the degenerative brain
    disease, which is the human form of mad cow disease.

    Some may already be passing it on through blood
    transfusions and contaminated surgical instruments, so that
    the disease may continue to kill for decades. Last night
    experts gave warning that the government-funded study,
    published today in the Journal of Pathology, might even
    have underestimated the threat.

    Pathologists who examined more than 12,500 specimens of
    tonsils and appendix removed in operations found evidence
    in three cases of the prion protein responsible for vCJD.

    Perhaps someone here has read the full paper? Is there any
    info on a control population? Do we really know that finding
    this protein in
    3/12000 tonsils is above background???

    bob

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.