General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Literacy Limps Into the Kill Zone

Started by jbuch · · Last activity · 2 posts · 363 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 February 2006
Last activity
16 February 2006
Original author
jbuch
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
363
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. SUMMARY ---------------------

    But it's not enough to simply vomit out of your fingers. It's important
    to say what you mean clearly, correctly and well. It's important to
    maintain high standards. It's important to think before you write.

    The technology of instant -- or near-instant -- communication works
    against that. But it's not as if you can't surmount this obstacle. You
    only have to be willing to try.

    ------------------------------

    Literacy Limps Into the Kill Zone

    Commentary by Tony Long | Also by this reporter
    02:00 AM Feb, 16, 2006

    Years ago, the night news editor at the newspaper where I worked got
    upset when his frivolous story judgment was questioned by another editor.

    "We can either put out a history book or a comic book," he said, taking
    a defensive swipe at a rebellious strand of hair. "I know which one I'm
    putting out."

    He was clearly a man ahead of his time.

    The Luddite
    The Luddite
    Welcome to the comic-book generation, the post-literate society. The
    stories that excited my news editor's imagination then -- the ones
    packed with lurid sex, vapid celebrity shenanigans, fallen idols -- are
    merely the plat du jour of journalism these days.

    It doesn't matter whether you're reading your local rag, surfing the net
    or trying to make heads or tails of someone's inane blog -- the quality
    bar is set lower than ever, which is saying a lot considering it was
    never set very high to begin with.

    But I'll save the critical examination of my profession for another
    column. Today, I want to talk about one of the byproducts of all this
    mediocrity. Today I want to talk about the all-out assault on the
    English language and the role technology plays in that unprovoked and
    dastardly attack. I especially want to talk about the ways dumbing down
    the language is not only seen as acceptable, but is tacitly encouraged
    as the status quo.

    Any number of my acquaintances excuse the bad writing and atrocious
    punctuation that proliferates in e-mail by saying, in essence, "Well, at
    least people are writing again." Horse droppings. People have never
    stopped writing, although it's reaching a point where you wish a lot of
    them would.

    The very nature of e-mail (which, along with first cousins IM and text
    messaging, is an undeniably handy means of chatting) encourages sloppy
    "penmanship," as it were. Its speed and informality sing a siren song of
    incompetent communication, a virtual hooker beckoning to the drunken
    sailor as he staggers along the wharf.

    But it's not enough to simply vomit out of your fingers. It's important
    to say what you mean clearly, correctly and well. It's important to
    maintain high standards. It's important to think before you write.

    The technology of instant -- or near-instant -- communication works
    against that. But it's not as if you can't surmount this obstacle. You
    only have to be willing to try.

    Technology conspires against language in another, more insidious way:
    The sheer speed with which things move these days has given us the
    five-second attention span, the 10-second sound bite and the splashy
    infographic that tells you very little, if anything, while fooling you
    into thinking that you are now somehow informed. (Of course, if you need
    more than 10 seconds to "get" Mariah Carey, well, shame on you.)

    Sadly, this devalues the thoughtful essayist and the sheer linguistic
    joy of the exposition. And the language dies a little more each day.

    Then there's the havoc wrought on spelling and punctuation by all this
    casual communication. You can't lay all that at the feet of technology,
    of course. Grammar skills have been eroding in this country for years
    and that has a lot more to do with lax instruction than it does with
    e-mail or instant messaging. (Math is a different matter. No student
    should be allowed to bring a calculator into a math class. Ever.)

    But couple those deficient grammar skills with the shorthand that's
    become prevalent in fast communication (not to mention all those
    irritating acronyms: LOL, WYSIWYG, IMHO, etc.) and you've just struck a
    match next to a can of gasoline. And people wonder why the tone of
    e-mail is so easily misunderstood.

    On another front, we live in a world where the creep of tech and
    business jargon threatens to make the language indecipherable to
    everyone, even the spewer of this bilge water. It's amazing that any
    business gets done at all, with junk like this clotting our
    communications arteries.

    Business jargon is simply the art of saying nothing while appearing to
    say a lot.

    As a result, we have CEOs of major corporations who lack the basic
    writing skills to pen a simple, in-house memo in plain-spoken English.
    We see marketing swine get paid princely sums to lie about their
    products in language so bloated with jargon that their lies -- and even
    their half-truths -- are unintelligible. We see company flacks churning
    out impenetrable press releases that no editor in his right mind would
    consider reading, let alone using. We see business reporting reduced to
    the trite and formulaic because the reporter is either too uncritical or
    too lazy to take a hard look at what lies behind the smoke and mirrors.

    Technical jargon, thankfully, is less invasive because most of it is so
    geeky that it has no practical application in the real world. Still, a
    few words and phrases manage to slip out now and then (help yourself
    here), especially when the business and tech boys overlap, which they
    frequently do. Eternal vigilance is required to nip these encroachments
    in the bud. While tech jargon might be very useful among engineers and
    programmers, it should stay among engineers and programmers so as not to
    frighten the children and the horses.

    Apologists will argue that language isn't static, that it's
    ever-changing and evolving. That's true. Language does change. Idiomatic
    English is the product of centuries of social and cultural infusion, a
    fact that gives modern-day English much of its color and flair.

    But when change does violence to the accepted standards of the king's
    English and takes the mother tongue into the realm of the unfathomable,
    as does almost all jargon coming out of the technology and business
    worlds, it's our job as keepers of the grail to drive it back into the
    dark little hole from whence it came.

    If you've got some time to kill, you're welcome to join us, the happy few.

    - - -
    Tony Long, copy chief at Wired News, believes that all business majors
    should be required to study Latin and minor in English lit.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    --
    1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
    2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
    3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
    book
    4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

  2. jbuch said:

    SUMMARY ---------------------

    But it's not enough to simply vomit out of your fingers. It's important
    to say what you mean clearly, correctly and well. It's important to
    maintain high standards. It's important to think before you write.

    The technology of instant -- or near-instant -- communication works
    against that. But it's not as if you can't surmount this obstacle. You
    only have to be willing to try.

    ------------------------------

    Literacy Limps Into the Kill Zone

    Commentary by Tony Long | Also by this reporter
    02:00 AM Feb, 16, 2006

    Years ago, the night news editor at the newspaper where I worked got
    upset when his frivolous story judgment was questioned by another editor.

    "We can either put out a history book or a comic book," he said, taking
    a defensive swipe at a rebellious strand of hair. "I know which one I'm
    putting out."

    He was clearly a man ahead of his time.

    The Luddite
    The Luddite
    Welcome to the comic-book generation, the post-literate society. The
    stories that excited my news editor's imagination then -- the ones
    packed with lurid sex, vapid celebrity shenanigans, fallen idols -- are
    merely the plat du jour of journalism these days.

    It doesn't matter whether you're reading your local rag, surfing the net
    or trying to make heads or tails of someone's inane blog -- the quality
    bar is set lower than ever, which is saying a lot considering it was
    never set very high to begin with.

    But I'll save the critical examination of my profession for another
    column. Today, I want to talk about one of the byproducts of all this
    mediocrity. Today I want to talk about the all-out assault on the
    English language and the role technology plays in that unprovoked and
    dastardly attack. I especially want to talk about the ways dumbing down
    the language is not only seen as acceptable, but is tacitly encouraged
    as the status quo.

    Any number of my acquaintances excuse the bad writing and atrocious
    punctuation that proliferates in e-mail by saying, in essence, "Well, at
    least people are writing again." Horse droppings. People have never
    stopped writing, although it's reaching a point where you wish a lot of
    them would.

    The very nature of e-mail (which, along with first cousins IM and text
    messaging, is an undeniably handy means of chatting) encourages sloppy
    "penmanship," as it were. Its speed and informality sing a siren song of
    incompetent communication, a virtual hooker beckoning to the drunken
    sailor as he staggers along the wharf.

    But it's not enough to simply vomit out of your fingers. It's important
    to say what you mean clearly, correctly and well. It's important to
    maintain high standards. It's important to think before you write.

    The technology of instant -- or near-instant -- communication works
    against that. But it's not as if you can't surmount this obstacle. You
    only have to be willing to try.

    Technology conspires against language in another, more insidious way:
    The sheer speed with which things move these days has given us the
    five-second attention span, the 10-second sound bite and the splashy
    infographic that tells you very little, if anything, while fooling you
    into thinking that you are now somehow informed. (Of course, if you need
    more than 10 seconds to "get" Mariah Carey, well, shame on you.)

    Sadly, this devalues the thoughtful essayist and the sheer linguistic
    joy of the exposition. And the language dies a little more each day.

    Then there's the havoc wrought on spelling and punctuation by all this
    casual communication. You can't lay all that at the feet of technology,
    of course. Grammar skills have been eroding in this country for years
    and that has a lot more to do with lax instruction than it does with
    e-mail or instant messaging. (Math is a different matter. No student
    should be allowed to bring a calculator into a math class. Ever.)

    But couple those deficient grammar skills with the shorthand that's
    become prevalent in fast communication (not to mention all those
    irritating acronyms: LOL, WYSIWYG, IMHO, etc.) and you've just struck a
    match next to a can of gasoline. And people wonder why the tone of
    e-mail is so easily misunderstood.

    On another front, we live in a world where the creep of tech and
    business jargon threatens to make the language indecipherable to
    everyone, even the spewer of this bilge water. It's amazing that any
    business gets done at all, with junk like this clotting our
    communications arteries.

    Business jargon is simply the art of saying nothing while appearing to
    say a lot.

    As a result, we have CEOs of major corporations who lack the basic
    writing skills to pen a simple, in-house memo in plain-spoken English.
    We see marketing swine get paid princely sums to lie about their
    products in language so bloated with jargon that their lies -- and even
    their half-truths -- are unintelligible. We see company flacks churning
    out impenetrable press releases that no editor in his right mind would
    consider reading, let alone using. We see business reporting reduced to
    the trite and formulaic because the reporter is either too uncritical or
    too lazy to take a hard look at what lies behind the smoke and mirrors.

    Technical jargon, thankfully, is less invasive because most of it is so
    geeky that it has no practical application in the real world. Still, a
    few words and phrases manage to slip out now and then (help yourself
    here), especially when the business and tech boys overlap, which they
    frequently do. Eternal vigilance is required to nip these encroachments
    in the bud. While tech jargon might be very useful among engineers and
    programmers, it should stay among engineers and programmers so as not to
    frighten the children and the horses.

    Apologists will argue that language isn't static, that it's
    ever-changing and evolving. That's true. Language does change. Idiomatic
    English is the product of centuries of social and cultural infusion, a
    fact that gives modern-day English much of its color and flair.

    But when change does violence to the accepted standards of the king's
    English and takes the mother tongue into the realm of the unfathomable,
    as does almost all jargon coming out of the technology and business
    worlds, it's our job as keepers of the grail to drive it back into the
    dark little hole from whence it came.

    If you've got some time to kill, you're welcome to join us, the happy few.

    - - -
    Tony Long, copy chief at Wired News, believes that all business majors
    should be required to study Latin and minor in English lit.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    --
    1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
    2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
    3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
    book
    4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.