Lifting gloves

OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

I scribbled re JMW

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Someone tell him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called
troll enabler. Silly J M D'OHbooya!

Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't
seem to follow yourself. <snerk!>

<cough!>

Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D

heh

You're most welcome, Om. And you are a slyyyy one, my friend. Or do
you not realize that you're making it impossible for ol' JMW to
pretend he's killfiled me? By replying to my posts, why, you're just
SHOVING IT IN HIS ~*SOUR*~ PUSS! Thankee, sai.

--

J M Will-he-ever-quit-whining? <[email hidden]> wrote:

re yours truly

Quoted message said:

So you think I shouldn't mention him at all?
Maybe I'll do that.

And maybe pigs will fly out of your ass sometime soon, pal.

Quoted message said:

You've actually been pretty good about ignoring
the others, BTW.

Who are *the others*? I assume David of Australia, my friend Charles
of the UK, and pesky ol' vinyl boy, The Broke Record, of course.

Oh, yeah, I'm certain that Om appreciates high marks from you on his
posting progress, J M Will-grade-your-posts-accordingly.

Quoted message said:

I'm beginning to wonder about Curt, though.

Funny, that. I don't wonder about you at all.

Quoted message said:

Is he still just a troll enabler, perhaps even an ardent
proponent of the trolls, or is he competing for full-
fledged troll status?

I'm no fan of labels (you're a [censored], though. NO doubt about that one.)
however - if I was so inclined - I'd categorize myself as someone who
appreciates freedom of speech. So please jam your troll faq and your
list of so-called trolls, troll-enablers, troll-friendly,
troll-accessible, et al. straight where the sun don't shine, you sour,
unhappy man.

THANKS!

--

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> J M Will-apparently-not-follow-his-own-suggestions
>> <[email hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >>> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> re lifting gloves
>> >>>
>> >>> >ithe risk of blisters.
>> >>>
>> >>> Omigod. Poor baby. Wouldn't want a callous now!
>> >>>
>> >>> (shudder)
>> >>
>> >></spelling flame> Callus </spelling flame>
>> >
>> >Shame on you! Curt James would never engage in spelling flames!
>>
>> AaaaahhhhahahahahHAHAHAH!
>>
>> Hey, look who has me listed as a troll enabler worthy of a killfile
>> and yet has the nerve to make reference to me in a post. Someone tell
>> him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called troll enabler. Silly J M
>> D'OHbooya!
>>
>> Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't seem to
>> follow yourself. <snerk!>
>>
>> (Was that all spelled right?)
>
><cough!>
>
>Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D

So you think I shouldn't mention him at all? Maybe I'll do that.

You've actually been pretty good about ignoring the others, BTW. I'm
beginning to wonder about Curt, though. Is he still just a troll
enabler, perhaps even an ardent proponent of the trolls, or is he
competing for full-fledged troll status?

To Om,
Just a word here OM - JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your
performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true identity -
(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't
reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler as you
have
been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Nobody but me owns me luv, but thanks for caring... :-)

You're his [censored] Om. You're bought and paid for.

Quoted message said:

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

Cheers!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack
Nicholson

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

<SOME SH!T>

Quoted message said:

To <snip>,
Just a word here <snip>- JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true identity -

I don't care if he's Bruce Willis. I don't care if he's gay, straight,
bi, or asexual. I don't care if he's the prime minister of
Bee'jurbahzja as well as next in line to the throne of The Kingdom of
Persia. His /true/ identity is of no interest to me, so JMW can shove
that trivia in his lower G.I. right along with his faq.

Quoted message said:

(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler

HEY DON'T BLOW THIS FOR ME DAVID! I'M ON THE FAST TRACK TO FULL-ON
JMW-AUTHORIZED (CUZ HE'S SO COOL) TRRRROLL!

Quoted message said:

as you have been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Is it Christmas where you are yet? Have a blessed one (or at least
reasonably hassle-free, eh?), my friend!

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

David said:

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> J M Will-apparently-not-follow-his-own-suggestions <[email hidden]>
>> wrote:
>> >OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >>> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> re lifting gloves
>> >>>
>> >>> >ithe risk of blisters.
>> >>>
>> >>> Omigod. Poor baby. Wouldn't want a callous now!
>> >>>
>> >>> (shudder)
>> >>
>> >></spelling flame> Callus </spelling flame>
>> >
>> >Shame on you! Curt James would never engage in spelling flames!
>>
>> AaaaahhhhahahahahHAHAHAH!
>>
>> Hey, look who has me listed as a troll enabler worthy of a killfile
>> and yet has the nerve to make reference to me in a post. Someone tell
>> him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called troll enabler. Silly J M
>> D'OHbooya!
>>
>> Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't seem to
>> follow yourself. <snerk!>
>>
>> (Was that all spelled right?)
>
><cough!>
>
>Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D

So you think I shouldn't mention him at all? Maybe I'll do that.

You've actually been pretty good about ignoring the others, BTW. I'm
beginning to wonder about Curt, though. Is he still just a troll
enabler, perhaps even an ardent proponent of the trolls, or is he
competing for full-fledged troll status?

To Om,
Just a word here OM - JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true identity -
(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler as you have
been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Nobody but me owns me luv, but thanks for caring... :-)

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

My mistake was to believe that trolls could be battled by head-on
confrontation. By challenging them, I enabled them. I confess.

The recent screeching of troll-like entities, horrified at the thought
of being ignored, tells me that filtering and not responding is the
right answer.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> J M Will-apparently-not-follow-his-own-suggestions
>>> <[email hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> re lifting gloves
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >ithe risk of blisters.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Omigod. Poor baby. Wouldn't want a callous now!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> (shudder)
>>> >>
>>> >></spelling flame> Callus </spelling flame>
>>> >
>>> >Shame on you! Curt James would never engage in spelling flames!
>>>
>>> AaaaahhhhahahahahHAHAHAH!
>>>
>>> Hey, look who has me listed as a troll enabler worthy of a killfile
>>> and yet has the nerve to make reference to me in a post. Someone
>>> tell
>>> him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called troll enabler. Silly J M
>>> D'OHbooya!
>>>
>>> Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't seem to
>>> follow yourself. <snerk!>
>>>
>>> (Was that all spelled right?)
>>
>><cough!>
>>
>>Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D
>
> So you think I shouldn't mention him at all? Maybe I'll do that.
>
> You've actually been pretty good about ignoring the others, BTW. I'm
> beginning to wonder about Curt, though. Is he still just a troll
> enabler, perhaps even an ardent proponent of the trolls, or is he
> competing for full-fledged troll status?

To Om,
Just a word here OM - JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your
performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true
identity -
(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous
identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't
reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and
probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler as you
have
been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Nobody but me owns me luv, but thanks for caring... :-)

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

My mistake was to believe that trolls could be battled by head-on
confrontation. By challenging them, I enabled them. I confess.

The recent screeching of troll-like entities, horrified at the thought
of being ignored, tells me that filtering and not responding is the
right answer.

But . . . bbbut . . . .correct me if I'm wrong . . .but haven't you just
responded (by referral) to a known troll enabler?

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

Curt James said:

J M Will-apparently-not-follow-his-own-suggestions <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> re lifting gloves
>>>
>>> >ithe risk of blisters.
>>>
>>> Omigod. Poor baby. Wouldn't want a callous now!
>>>
>>> (shudder)
>>
>></spelling flame> Callus </spelling flame>
>
>Shame on you! Curt James would never engage in spelling flames!

AaaaahhhhahahahahHAHAHAH!

Hey, look who has me listed as a troll enabler worthy of a killfile
and yet has the nerve to make reference to me in a post. Someone tell
him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called troll enabler. Silly J M
D'OHbooya!

Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't seem to
follow yourself. <snerk!>

(Was that all spelled right?)

<cough!>

Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D

So you think I shouldn't mention him at all? Maybe I'll do that.

You've actually been pretty good about ignoring the others, BTW. I'm
beginning to wonder about Curt, though. Is he still just a troll
enabler, perhaps even an ardent proponent of the trolls, or is he
competing for full-fledged troll status?

What difference does it make you crazy loon? You are quite impotent
and your role as self-appointed Sheriff of MFW ended long ago.

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

<SOME SH!T>

Quoted message said:

To <snip>,
Just a word here <snip>- JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your
performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true identity -

I don't care if he's Bruce Willis. I don't care if he's gay, straight,
bi, or asexual. I don't care if he's the prime minister of
Bee'jurbahzja as well as next in line to the throne of The Kingdom of
Persia. His /true/ identity is of no interest to me, so JMW can shove
that trivia in his lower G.I. right along with his faq.

Ha ha! - Yes there are two people that bit of trivia is of interest - Om
and JMW

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't
reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler

HEY DON'T BLOW THIS FOR ME DAVID! I'M ON THE FAST TRACK TO FULL-ON
JMW-AUTHORIZED (CUZ HE'S SO COOL) TRRRROLL!

I think you might just make it the way you're going. JMW is a hard man (hard
but fair) and when he makes a decision, well, he can make or break the
average man !

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

as you have been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Is it Christmas where you are yet? Have a blessed one (or at least
reasonably hassle-free, eh?), my friend!

Yes Mate - it is Sunday morning now - my family all coming over - will have
a rip roarin' day!
Hope you have a great Xmas urself!

Quoted message said:

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

Nobody but me owns me luv, but thanks for caring... :-)

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

Cheers!

People of investigative inclination and/or abilities can figure out
who is who all for themselves. To some, that would take true (i.e
stalkish) interest in, say, Om, and inordinate amount of time
researching. Others are simply good at noticing writing patterns.

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

My mistake was to believe that trolls could be battled by head-on
confrontation. By challenging them, I enabled them. I confess.

The recent screeching of troll-like entities, horrified at the thought
of being ignored, tells me that filtering and not responding is the
right answer.

Why isn't it working then John Williams you great fraud?

Just because you don't reply direct to those you have designated
"trolls", doesn't mean that you're not still "trolling" when you reply
to them indirectly, through a third party post.

What about that post this morning with the false ID then?

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> J M Will-apparently-not-follow-his-own-suggestions
>>> <[email hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >> Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>> JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> re lifting gloves
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >ithe risk of blisters.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Omigod. Poor baby. Wouldn't want a callous now!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> (shudder)
>>> >>
>>> >></spelling flame> Callus </spelling flame>
>>> >
>>> >Shame on you! Curt James would never engage in spelling flames!
>>>
>>> AaaaahhhhahahahahHAHAHAH!
>>>
>>> Hey, look who has me listed as a troll enabler worthy of a killfile
>>> and yet has the nerve to make reference to me in a post. Someone
>>> tell
>>> him that he's a /enabling/ a so-called troll enabler. Silly J M
>>> D'OHbooya!
>>>
>>> Glad you went to the trouble of creating a faq you can't seem to
>>> follow yourself. <snerk!>
>>>
>>> (Was that all spelled right?)
>>
>><cough!>
>>
>>Almost needed a new keyboard there, thanks! ;-D
>
> So you think I shouldn't mention him at all? Maybe I'll do that.
>
> You've actually been pretty good about ignoring the others, BTW. I'm
> beginning to wonder about Curt, though. Is he still just a troll
> enabler, perhaps even an ardent proponent of the trolls, or is he
> competing for full-fledged troll status?

To Om,
Just a word here OM - JMW has praised you here "you've been pretty good
about ignoring the others" - means so far he is happy with your
performance.
Be careful not to get JMW off side as he will expose your true
identity -
(you know he has called himself 'the enforcer' in his previous
identity).
What he is saying above is that although he is (so far) happy with you,
don't push your luck by replying to 'troll enablers'. (so if you don't
reply
to this, I will understand). You see, JMW is a control freak and
probably
thinks he owns you now. So Curt as you know is a troll enabler as you
have
been reminded by JMW above. Just be careful, Mate.

Nobody but me owns me luv, but thanks for caring... :-)

You see, I'm a bit of a reformed troll myself so he had a valid issue
with me. I'm ok with it.

One thing I will always do is own up to my mistakes!

My mistake was to believe that trolls could be battled by head-on
confrontation. By challenging them, I enabled them. I confess.

The recent screeching of troll-like entities, horrified at the thought
of being ignored, tells me that filtering and not responding is the
right answer.

Just a leetle question . . . if you are successfully filtering out the
trolls how can you be aware of the 'recent screechings'?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

In article <[email hidden]>,

Curt James said:

Who are *the others*? I assume David of Australia, my friend Charles
of the UK, and pesky ol' vinyl boy, The Broke Record, of course.

TBR...

His posts are getting to be so retarded, they really are not worthy of
attention anyway.
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

You're his [censored] Om. You're bought and paid for.

<rolls eyes>
Thank you for your support...

Merry Christmas by the way!

I'm fixin' to quit wasting time here and go do some cooking.
I have some cheese balls to make! Very easy:

8 oz. cream cheese at room temp.
8 oz. fine shredded Colby/Jack cheese
2 tbs. grated parmesan
1 small can of minced black olives

Combine the cheese in a bowl until well mixed.
Form into a ball and turn out onto a foil covered peice of cardboard if
you are taking it to a party (this makes it disposable) or a plate if
you are doing this for a home appetizer.

Form the cheese into a 1/2 sphere, then coat it liberally with the
minced olives.

Chill until set.

Serve with your choice of crackers.

Chopped green salad olives also work.

Cheers!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Curt James said:

Who are *the others*? I assume David of Australia, my friend Charles
of the UK, and pesky ol' vinyl boy, The Broke Record, of course.

TBR...

His posts are getting to be so retarded, they really are not worthy of
attention anyway.

Tell me this ...

Is it my imagination, or have a couple of people engaged in almost
manic posting today, all on a single subject, regardless of the
subject of the thread?

If so, does that tell you anything?

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Curt James said:

Who are *the others*? I assume David of Australia, my friend Charles
of the UK, and pesky ol' vinyl boy, The Broke Record, of course.

TBR...

His posts are getting to be so retarded, they really are not worthy of
attention anyway.

Tell me this ...

Is it my imagination, or have a couple of people engaged in almost
manic posting today, all on a single subject, regardless of the
subject of the thread?

If so, does that tell you anything?

I'm not sure what to think...
It's Christmas eve, I'm surprised that there is much posting going on at
all!

I'm just procrastinating and really need to get off my butt and finish
getting ready for Christmas. <G> I have a few gifts still left to wrap.

Are you with family for the holiday?
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

You're his [censored] Om. You're bought and paid for.

<rolls eyes>
Thank you for your support...

Merry Christmas by the way!

I'm fixin' to quit wasting time here and go do some cooking.
I have some cheese balls to make! Very easy:

8 oz. cream cheese at room temp.
8 oz. fine shredded Colby/Jack cheese
2 tbs. grated parmesan
1 small can of minced black olives

Combine the cheese in a bowl until well mixed.
Form into a ball and turn out onto a foil covered peice of cardboard if
you are taking it to a party (this makes it disposable) or a plate if
you are doing this for a home appetizer.

Form the cheese into a 1/2 sphere, then coat it liberally with the
minced olives.

Chill until set.

Serve with your choice of crackers.

Chopped green salad olives also work.

Great recipe! Really sounds yummy thanks. Even seems simple to make.
Merry Christmas Om!

In article <[email hidden]>,

JRH said:

What difference does it make you crazy loon? You are quite impotent
and your role as self-appointed Sheriff of MFW ended long ago.

By definition, if he's *self-appointed*, his role ends when he says it
does.

Seth
--
Wow! This math stuff works. -- Tom Morley

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

J M Will-he-ever-quit-whining? <[email hidden]> wrote:

re yours truly

Quoted message said:

So you think I shouldn't mention him at all?
Maybe I'll do that.

And maybe pigs will fly out of your ass sometime soon, pal.

Quoted message said:

You've actually been pretty good about ignoring
the others, BTW.

Who are *the others*? I assume David of Australia, my friend Charles
of the UK, and pesky ol' vinyl boy, The Broke Record, of course.

Oh, yeah, I'm certain that Om appreciates high marks from you on his
posting progress, J M Will-grade-your-posts-accordingly.

Quoted message said:

I'm beginning to wonder about Curt, though.

Funny, that. I don't wonder about you at all.

Quoted message said:

Is he still just a troll enabler, perhaps even an ardent
proponent of the trolls, or is he competing for full-
fledged troll status?

I'm no fan of labels (you're a [censored], though. NO doubt about that one.)
however - if I was so inclined - I'd categorize myself as someone who
appreciates freedom of speech. So please jam your troll faq and your
list of so-called trolls, troll-enablers, troll-friendly,
troll-accessible, et al. straight where the sun don't shine, you sour,
unhappy man.

THANKS!

That's brilliantly well expressed!!

Quoted message said:

--

(Seth Breidbart) said:

JRH said:

What difference does it make you crazy loon? You are quite impotent
and your role as self-appointed Sheriff of MFW ended long ago.

By definition, if he's *self-appointed*, his role ends when he says it
does.

Indeed. But I now prefer the role of publisher, providing valuable
information to improve the reading enjoyment of others.

JMW said:

Tell me this ...

Is it my imagination, or have a couple of people engaged in almost
manic posting today, all on a single subject, regardless of the
subject of the thread?

If so, does that tell you anything?

That there's a high noise to signal ratio.

I actually got a good answer. In fact, both Lee and Om said the same
thing and I'm planning on checking out the glove options at my local
Agway when I go to buy the dog food that is Cohen-approved.

I don't need much help these days, but when I do, MFW comes through.

Dally