Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

LEMOND STRIKES AGAIN

Started by datakoll · · Last activity · 41 posts · 1,081 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 August 2007
Last activity
30 August 2007
Original author
datakoll
Posts
41
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,081
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 41
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. datakoll said:

    whew.
    i wrote on this as (sorry) as I thought the incident boiled in its
    place and time. Kinda quirky relevant to you know landmines uhiuh
    Sudan....WTC NHL strike that kinda thing. Also I was mistaken where
    the incident occured-my information was at the TdF on site. wrong
    again.
    So when i saw the NYT photo, I was amused by the black humor (the
    entire disaster no longer quirky) of Llody's expression at whathisname
    uhuh Lemond coming thru the door wearing a cape, flash throwing it
    open to expose himself then running out to vanish in the smog.
    but the response is a lynch mob.
    I guesss it's not funny anymore.

    Headline in this week's Onion:
    "Wikipedia entry for "Dada" may or may not have been vandalized"
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  2. http://thinkexist.com/quotation/misery_loves_company-but_company_does_not/163465.html

  3. datakoll said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/sports/playmagazine/0819play-floyd....

    Sorry, can't read the article. The NY Times wants me to pay $4.95 for
    the single article, $7.95 for a month's on-line subscription, or
    $49.95 for a year. Anyone care to post it, or should I just file it
    under yesterday's news?

    Smokey

  4. Smokey said:
    datakoll said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/sports/playmagazine/0819play-floyd....

    Sorry, can't read the article. The NY Times wants me to pay $4.95 for
    the single article, $7.95 for a month's on-line subscription, or
    $49.95 for a year. Anyone care to post it, or should I just file it
    under yesterday's news?

    Smokey

    It's not much. A reporter follows Landis around for a day or so,
    talking to Floyd and his wife Amber about how the positive doping test
    has affected their lives. Amber expresses concern about Floyd through
    sincerity and black humor, Floyd expresses frustration and rage
    through black humor and a smearing tirade against Greg LeMond. Then he
    goes for a 'training' ride with a bunch of local Dr's and lawyers to
    raise money for his 'Fairness Fund'.

    The article, I thought, casts Floyd as a helplessly, incurably, almost
    lametably blunt but straight shooter, which would suggest that he
    would be incapable of maintaining an outright lie for this long. I
    think that, overall, it works in his favor in the court of public
    opinion, but I'm not sure that a reader's consensus would bear that
    out.

    /s

  5. register as a member. nyt software/ultimate may recog my ID and skip
    my request directly into the system. not register? search
    NYT>Landis>TdF sports page>Outcast zaaapppp uder

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/sports/playmagazine/0819play-floyd.html?ex=1188360000&en=0adc65d447aa3bfe&ei=5070

  6. the pro rider defined.

  7. Scott Gordo wrote:
    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    The article, I thought, casts Floyd as a helplessly, incurably, almost
    lametably blunt but straight shooter, which would suggest that he
    would be incapable of maintaining an outright lie for this long. I
    think that, overall, it works in his favor in the court of public
    opinion, but I'm not sure that a reader's consensus would bear that
    out.

    /s

    Odd. I thought that the article painted Landis as lost, helpless, and
    suffering. I was left with the impression that he would say anything
    the came into his head. More to the point, I thought he sounded a bit
    dumb - which fit just fine with notion that he would do drugs and get
    caught.

  8. Lemond has no credibility when every time an American has a serious
    chance of winning Lemond will come up with some [censored] story like this.

  9. datakoll said:
    RU12? said:

    Lemond has no credibility when every time an American has a serious
    chance of winning Lemond will come up with some [censored] story like this.

    well, lemond did strike again at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/aug07/aug26news

    [snip]

    You're right, if "strike again" means speaking out against doping. I
    don't know enough to evaluate his recommendations, but I definitely
    share his concern about kids joining the sport. And I admire him for
    continuing to talk about the doping problem. It would be great if Lance
    occasionally worked to help clean up the sport that has given him so much.

  10. Reid said:

    Scott Gordo wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    The article, I thought, casts Floyd as a helplessly, incurably, almost
    lametably blunt but straight shooter, which would suggest that he
    would be incapable of maintaining an outright lie for this long. I
    think that, overall, it works in his favor in the court of public
    opinion, but I'm not sure that a reader's consensus would bear that
    out.

    Quoted message said:

    /s

    Odd. I thought that the article painted Landis as lost, helpless, and
    suffering. I was left with the impression that he would say anything
    the came into his head. More to the point, I thought he sounded a bit
    dumb - which fit just fine with notion that he would do drugs and get
    caught.

    It sounds like our impression of Landis after reading the article is
    almost completely shared, except for a final bit of interpretation.

    Does Landis have zero brain-to-mouth editing power? Are these attacks
    as calculated as when racing? Are they displaced self-loathing and
    guilt? Are they righteous rage? Smokescreen?

    I guess this is why people should pay shrinks instead of trust
    newsgroups, and why, as Landis accurately states, no matter what the
    truth is his image will be forever dubious for as long as he denies
    doping.

    Scott

  11. You're right, if
    "strike again" means speaking out against doping
    concern about kids
    joining the sport
    our impression
    completely shared
    final bit
    of interpretation
    I guess
    I guess Prudhomme's (France) decision to INSTALL Contedor
    Is a final bit of completely shared impression concern about kids
    joining the sport
    means speaking out about doping striking again the idea Landis is
    rational

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Reid said:
    datakoll said:
    RU12? said:

    Lemond has no credibility when every time an American has a serious
    chance of winning Lemond will come up with some [censored] story like this.

    well, lemond did strike again at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/aug07/aug26news

    [snip]

    You're right, if "strike again" means speaking out against doping. I
    don't know enough to evaluate his recommendations, but I definitely
    share his concern about kids joining the sport. And I admire him for
    continuing to talk about the doping problem. It would be great if Lance
    occasionally worked to help clean up the sport that has given him so much.

    Football, basketball, baseball, futbol, track&field,
    swimming, tennis, golf, dressage are OK because they do
    not use drugs.

    --
    Michael Press

  13. Michael Press said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Reid said:
    datakoll said:

    On Aug 27, 11:45 pm, RU12? <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Lemond has no credibility when every time an American has a serious
    > chance of winning Lemond will come up with some [censored] story like this.

    well, lemond did strike again at:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/aug07/aug26news

    [snip]

    You're right, if "strike again" means speaking out against doping. I
    don't know enough to evaluate his recommendations, but I definitely
    share his concern about kids joining the sport. And I admire him for
    continuing to talk about the doping problem. It would be great if Lance
    occasionally worked to help clean up the sport that has given him so much.

    Football, basketball, baseball, futbol, track&field,
    swimming, tennis, golf, dressage are OK because they do
    not use drugs.

    They are okay because they have a sane drug policy, not because there aren't
    players using.

    IF cycling gets a sane, well enforced policy and follows their own damn
    procedures all will be well. That's all it really takes.

    Oh, and ignore guys like Greg Lemond unless he starts acting sober.

    Ron

  14. Hobbes@spnb&s.com said:

    Oh, and ignore guys like Greg Lemond unless he starts acting sober.

    It's difficult to act sober unless you are sober.

    (IOW, if rumors are enough): Let's get Greg tested. Frankly, he looks
    like he needs help.

    Baseball, football (USA) are *known* to have the same problems.
    Include any other pro sport, include college athletics, and down into
    high school and even younger-- there's a great deal of misbehavior at
    all levels, including alumni and parents of minor (age) athletes.
    Cycling, and the weakest participants therein ("riders"😉 are being
    scapegoated for a pie-in-the-sky illusion of "purity" that has never
    had an existence in the real world-- including amateur Cat V parking
    lot criteriums.

    Get real. Don't buy into the [censored]. --D-y

  15. testing testing? I'm told I was subject to "testing" so I assume
    "testing" of let's see who would we test, is possible?
    Pee Wee Herman? uhuh Jason Giambi? Kuloo the soccer player? Guiliani?
    say how 'bout this guy Merkx?

  16. On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:54:12 -0700, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Hobbes@spnb&s.com said:

    Oh, and ignore guys like Greg Lemond unless he starts acting sober.

    It's difficult to act sober unless you are sober.

    (IOW, if rumors are enough): Let's get Greg tested. Frankly, he looks
    like he needs help.

    Quoted message said:

    Baseball, football (USA) are *known* to have the same problems.
    Include any other pro sport, include college athletics, and down into
    high school and even younger-- there's a great deal of misbehavior at
    all levels, including alumni and parents of minor (age) athletes.

    Thirtyfive years ago there were steroids in high school football programs. Guys
    packing on 35 pounds of muscle from one year to the next. Specific doctors were
    talked about (in that world where qualude docs had lines around the block it
    wasn't hard to find someone who would prescribe). I don't know if anything's
    changed with the prescription of HGH to teens for psychological reasons from a
    few years ago - seems small football players feel insecure.

    Quoted message said:

    Cycling, and the weakest participants therein ("riders"😉 are being
    scapegoated for a pie-in-the-sky illusion of "purity" that has never
    had an existence in the real world-- including amateur Cat V parking
    lot criteriums.

    Get real. Don't buy into the [censored]. --D-y

  17. datakoll said:

    testing testing? I'm told I was subject to "testing" so I assume
    "testing" of let's see who would we test, is possible?
    Pee Wee Herman? uhuh Jason Giambi? Kuloo the soccer player? Guiliani?
    say how 'bout this guy Merkx?

    Both the guys named "Merckx" are retired. Well, maybe one more year
    for the kid.

    Gooleyani is on stuff you can't urine test for. --D-y

  18. information I have is whatever it is the lab looks for, the lab will
    find: years after ingestion. Paraphrasing what Ligget said of
    Rasmussen, 'he's the mountain champion and he's winning so he's guilty
    of the charge.' So when Merkx is gulity and Herman is guilty and
    everyone is guilty then everyone can go back racing and ...
    hmmm that doesn't solve the problem.

  19. Hobbes@spnb&s.com said:

    On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:54:12 -0700, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Hobbes@spnb&s.com said:

    Oh, and ignore guys like Greg Lemond unless he starts acting sober.


    It's difficult to act sober unless you are sober.

    (IOW, if rumors are enough): Let's get Greg tested. Frankly, he looks
    like he needs help.

    Quoted message said:

    Baseball, football (USA) are *known* to have the same problems.
    Include any other pro sport, include college athletics, and down into
    high school and even younger-- there's a great deal of misbehavior at
    all levels, including alumni and parents of minor (age) athletes.

    Thirtyfive years ago there were steroids in high school football programs. Guys
    packing on 35 pounds of muscle from one year to the next. Specific doctors were
    talked about (in that world where qualude docs had lines around the block it
    wasn't hard to find someone who would prescribe). I don't know if anything's
    changed with the prescription of HGH to teens for psychological reasons from a
    few years ago - seems small football players feel insecure.


    [snip]

    Sounds very much like what Greg said about Lance and Ferrari. But not
    just that Ferrari would prescribe it, but that he would recommend EPO
    and was comfortable with dope as part of a cyclist's program.

  20. Slow day?
    Here's the same problem from channel one on Planets Ba, A1, and Euro

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/fashion/30baggy.html?ex=1346126400&en=47547e34339dc9d7&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/health/28books.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/science/28crop.html?ref=science

    recommend EPO as...?
    maybe. maybe the Dr. is speaking with a pro rider.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.