UK and Europe · Public discussion

Leisure vs Utility

Started by Roos Eisma · · Last activity · 2 posts · 432 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 September 2006
Last activity
12 September 2006
Original author
Roos Eisma
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
432
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As David posted here yesterday Dundee council had a meeting about
    maintenance of roads. The reply Pete received today (after asking
    questions about cycle path gritting and cleaning) had the following
    sentences:

    "Further to your e-mail, I did ask at last night's meeting what
    arrangements had been made for cycle tracks and whilst the Director said
    he would examine the issue, his attitude was that the cycle tracks were
    really only there for the purpose of leisure.

    I pointed out that it was rather wasteful to invest so much in cycle
    tracks and make no provision for them to be gritted during the winter
    months. I am afraid it was all down to budgets and setting priorities for
    main routes and bus routes."

    On one hand it is depressing that people at that level don't understand
    that I and many others use our bikes as transport, to replace a car when
    going to work, school, shops, and pubs. To enable us to reduce the number
    of cars on the road that way we need clean rideable surfaces along
    efficient routes.

    On the other hand it reinforces that there is no need to use any of the
    facilities as I'm not doing it for leisure - and as the roads are cleaned
    and gritted they fit my requirements for utility cycling 🙂

    Roos

  2. Roos Eisma said:

    As David posted here yesterday Dundee council had a meeting about
    maintenance of roads. The reply Pete received today (after asking
    questions about cycle path gritting and cleaning) had the following
    sentences:

    "Further to your e-mail, I did ask at last night's meeting what
    arrangements had been made for cycle tracks and whilst the Director said
    he would examine the issue, his attitude was that the cycle tracks were
    really only there for the purpose of leisure.

    I pointed out that it was rather wasteful to invest so much in cycle
    tracks and make no provision for them to be gritted during the winter
    months. I am afraid it was all down to budgets and setting priorities for
    main routes and bus routes."

    On one hand it is depressing that people at that level don't understand
    that I and many others use our bikes as transport, to replace a car when
    going to work, school, shops, and pubs. To enable us to reduce the number
    of cars on the road that way we need clean rideable surfaces along
    efficient routes.

    On the other hand it reinforces that there is no need to use any of the
    facilities as I'm not doing it for leisure - and as the roads are cleaned
    and gritted they fit my requirements for utility cycling 🙂

    It confirms my suspicions that the Director of Transport considers
    cycle paths to be part of Leisure and Arts. I raised the question of
    pedestrians as allegedly >20% of trips to work are on foot.

    That kind of reply does however give ammunition against the 'gerroff
    the road' crown (including silly judges south of the border).

    ...d

    Quoted message said:


    Roos

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.