Road Cycling · Public discussion

Lance on Leno

Started by psycholist · · Last activity · 60 posts · 1,333 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 September 2004
Last activity
8 September 2004
Original author
psycholist
Posts
60
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,333
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 60
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. S o r n i said:

    If you really think that Leno's joke (and Bob's re-telling of it) warrant
    that kind of vitriol, have at it.

    There was no vitriol.

    I was just using an (admittedly more striking) example of offensive racism
    (Historical fact, BTW), to try to make the point that seems to be utterly lost
    on so many people.

    ALL racism is offensive, not just that directed at other people.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill "big difference between poking fun (at HISTORICAL FACT by the way) and
    hate-filled rhetoric" S.

    In your mind, Bill, yes, because you, like so many others, see nothing shameful
    at poking fun at the French, but get all indignant when people poke fun at
    Americans.

    MILLIONS died in the two invasions Leno joked about (including a lot of
    Americans). True, it was a long time ago, but you are like so many, you set
    yourself up as some sort of God who can say (It's OK to poke fun at these people
    and their tragedy, but you can't poke fun at these.)

    It's simple hypocracy, and the sooner you stop deluding yourself that it isn't,
    the better.

    KC

  2. S o r n i said:
    the black rose said:

    I first heard it as:
    What do you call 10,000 violas at the bottom of the sea?
    A good start.

    Now *that's* funny if you're a musician. If you're not, you might not
    get it.

    It goes along with the following pair:
    How do you get 10 violinists to play in tune?
    Shoot 9 of them.
    How do you get 10 violists to play in tune?
    Shoot all 10 of them.

    Careful, Rose. Ken Case will call you racist.

    Bill "just don't mess with the trombonists, baby" S.

    Bill, you got just as upset at unpleasant racism as I did.

    Only diference is that I was upset by *all* the racism, you were only offended
    at the anti American stuff, and rather excused that directed elsewhere.

    Oh, and Bill, violinists aren't a race 😉

    KC

  3. Ken Case said:
    S o r n i said:

    the black rose wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It goes along with the following pair:
    How do you get 10 violinists to play in tune?
    Shoot 9 of them.
    How do you get 10 violists to play in tune?
    Shoot all 10 of them.

    Careful, Rose. Ken Case will call you racist.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill, you got just as upset at unpleasant racism as I did.

    Only diference is that I was upset by *all* the racism, you were only
    offended at the anti American stuff, and rather excused that directed
    elsewhere.

    I would be upset (take offense more accurate) at ANY joke about 3000 dead
    people. By the way, they WEREN'T all Americans.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, and Bill, violinists aren't a race 😉

    Neither are Americans and Frenchies. They're nationalities.

    Sorry, Ken, I just don't think a late-night talk-show snide remark warrants
    something as cruel as what you posted. (I wasn't aware of the other groups
    you follow where someone posted something TRULY hateful against the French;
    two separate things, however.)

    Bill "appropriateness" S.

  4. Ken Case said:
    S o r n i said:

    If you really think that Leno's joke (and Bob's re-telling of it)
    warrant that kind of vitriol, have at it.

    There was no vitriol.

    I was just using an (admittedly more striking) example of offensive
    racism (Historical fact, BTW), to try to make the point that seems to
    be utterly lost on so many people.

    ALL racism is offensive, not just that directed at other people.

    Stop saying racism when it's really nationalism.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Bill "big difference between poking fun (at HISTORICAL FACT by the
    way) and hate-filled rhetoric" S.

    In your mind, Bill, yes, because you, like so many others, see
    nothing shameful at poking fun at the French, but get all indignant
    when people poke fun at Americans.

    Poking fun at France's propensity for surrendering and laughing at 3000 dead
    people (of MANY nationalities) are not comparable in my opinion.

    Quoted message said:

    MILLIONS died in the two invasions Leno joked about (including a lot
    of Americans). True, it was a long time ago, but you are like so
    many, you set yourself up as some sort of God who can say (It's OK to
    poke fun at these people and their tragedy, but you can't poke fun at
    these.)

    It's simple hypocracy, and the sooner you stop deluding yourself that
    it isn't, the better.

    If there was a terrorist attack in Paris and many innocent people were
    killed, I would think it TOTALLY REPREHENSIBLE to make jokes about it.
    Period. (Same goes for Russia, Bali, Ireland, wherever.)

    Maybe Leno was insensitive to the French. I didn't see it.

    Bill "moral equivalence lacking is all I'm saying" S.

  5. "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Ken Case wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In your mind, Bill, yes, because you, like so many others, see
    nothing shameful at poking fun at the French, but get all indignant
    when people poke fun at Americans.

    Poking fun at France's propensity for surrendering

    Tell it to Napolean.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  6. S o r n i said:

    Sorry, Ken, I just don't think a late-night talk-show snide remark warrants
    something as cruel as what you posted.

    I posted it as an example of what the nationalistic [censored] can degenerate into,
    not as a joke.

    KV

  7. Ken Case said:
    S o r n i said:

    Sorry, Ken, I just don't think a late-night talk-show snide remark
    warrants something as cruel as what you posted.

    I posted it as an example of what the nationalistic [censored] can
    degenerate into, not as a joke.

    Well, at least you're now calling it /nationalistic/ [censored] and not /racist/
    [censored]. 🙂

    Bill "may ride mountain bike just to use the Mavics (cheap gesture -- well
    actually expensive!)" S.

  8. DRS said:

    Tell it to Napolean.

    we could, but well, he's dead. christ, is the australian school system as
    [censored] poor as ours?
    --
    david reuteler
    [email hidden]

  9. S o r n i said:
    Ken Case said:
    S o r n i said:

    Sorry, Ken, I just don't think a late-night talk-show snide remark
    warrants something as cruel as what you posted.

    I posted it as an example of what the nationalistic [censored] can
    degenerate into, not as a joke.

    Well, at least you're now calling it /nationalistic/ [censored] and not /racist/
    [censored]. 🙂

    That's because you are correct. Americans (and Austrailians, Canadians, British)
    are not a race, as you said.

    If someone points out an error in what I have written, I like to take it on
    board (unless I'm feeling stupidly combatative).

    KC

  10. "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    Tell it to Napolean.

    we could, but well, he's dead. christ, is the australian school
    system as [censored] poor as ours?

    I assume you're talking about the phrase "tell it to..." rather than the
    typo. You're the second American to get hung up on it rather than focus on
    the point being made. Oh, and no, the Australian school system is not as
    poor as yours. We still teach the correct use of capitalization.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  11. DRS said:

    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    Tell it to Napolean.

    we could, but well, he's dead. christ, is the australian school
    system as [censored] poor as ours?

    I assume you're talking about the phrase "tell it to..." rather than the
    typo. You're the second American to get hung up on it rather than focus on
    the point being made. Oh, and no, the Australian school system is not as
    poor as yours. We still teach the correct use of capitalization.

    soooo, you know napeoleon is dead right?
    --
    david reuteler
    [email hidden]

  12. Sat, 4 Sep 2004 04:29:43 +1000, <[email hidden]>, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Ken Case wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In your mind, Bill, yes, because you, like so many others, see
    nothing shameful at poking fun at the French, but get all indignant
    when people poke fun at Americans.

    Poking fun at France's propensity for surrendering

    Tell it to Napolean.

    De Gaulle would have slapped piddlewits snotless for that remark.

    1,400,000 French soldiers were killed during WWI. As a result, there
    weren't many Frenchmen left to fight in World War II. More than
    100,000 French soldiers died trying to stop Adolf [censored].

    Relying on the Maginot Line was stupid stupid stupid but it does not
    reflect on the courage of those who died for France in 1940.

    Yet yanks like to conveniently forget that for 18 months after that
    execrable defeat, the USA continued to have cordial diplomatic
    relations with Nazi Germany.
    --
    zk

  13. "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    DRS <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Tell it to Napolean.

    we could, but well, he's dead. christ, is the australian school
    system as [censored] poor as ours?

    I assume you're talking about the phrase "tell it to..." rather than
    the typo. You're the second American to get hung up on it rather
    than focus on the point being made. Oh, and no, the Australian
    school system is not as poor as yours. We still teach the correct
    use of capitalization.

    soooo, you know napeoleon is dead right?

    Yes. Otherwise you Yanks wouldn't be getting hung up on the phrasing, eh?

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  14. "Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Sat, 4 Sep 2004 04:29:43 +1000, <[email hidden]>, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Ken Case wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    > In your mind, Bill, yes, because you, like so many others, see
    > nothing shameful at poking fun at the French, but get all indignant
    > when people poke fun at Americans.

    Poking fun at France's propensity for surrendering

    Tell it to Napolean.

    De Gaulle would have slapped piddlewits snotless for that remark.

    1,400,000 French soldiers were killed during WWI. As a result, there
    weren't many Frenchmen left to fight in World War II.

    And 1,935,000 German soldiers died, so how was it Germany had troops enough
    in 1939? (Hint: it was 21 years later).

    Quoted message said:

    More than
    100,000 French soldiers died trying to stop Adolf [censored].

    Relying on the Maginot Line was stupid stupid stupid but it does not
    reflect on the courage of those who died for France in 1940.

    Yet yanks like to conveniently forget that for 18 months after that
    execrable defeat, the USA continued to have cordial diplomatic
    relations with Nazi Germany.

    I don't know about cordial. But Joseph Kennedy had a lot to answer for.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  15. DRS said:

    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    soooo, you know napeoleon is dead right?


    Yes. Otherwise you Yanks wouldn't be getting hung up on the phrasing, eh?

    ahhhh, i'm half australian ... mate. me dear mum. maybe we can hoist a
    few victoria bitters next time i'm down under?
    --
    david reuteler
    [email hidden]

  16. Sat, 4 Sep 2004 05:54:50 +1000, <[email hidden]>, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    1,400,000 French soldiers were killed during WWI. As a result, there
    weren't many Frenchmen left to fight in World War II.

    And 1,935,000 German soldiers died, so how was it Germany had troops enough
    in 1939? (Hint: it was 21 years later).

    Population -1939
    Germany (including Austria) 76,008,000
    France 41,600,000

    Steel production in tons - 1939
    Germany - 23,329,000
    France - 6,221,000
    --
    zk

  17. "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    soooo, you know napeoleon is dead right?


    Yes. Otherwise you Yanks wouldn't be getting hung up on the
    phrasing, eh?

    ahhhh, i'm half australian ... mate. me dear mum. maybe we can
    hoist a few victoria bitters next time i'm down under?

    If you're half-Aus then why, oh why are you getting hung up about an
    Australian phrase? Jesus wept, loosen up.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  18. "Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Sat, 4 Sep 2004 05:54:50 +1000, <[email hidden]>, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    1,400,000 French soldiers were killed during WWI. As a result, there
    weren't many Frenchmen left to fight in World War II.

    And 1,935,000 German soldiers died, so how was it Germany had troops
    enough in 1939? (Hint: it was 21 years later).

    Population -1939
    Germany (including Austria) 76,008,000
    France 41,600,000

    You left out Britain. In any event, I contend there were more than enough
    Allies to fight the Germans. Numbers were not the problem.

    Quoted message said:

    Steel production in tons - 1939
    Germany - 23,329,000
    France - 6,221,000

    That's not necessarily indicative of anything substantive other than that
    Germany was preparing for war and France wasn't.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  19. DRS said:


    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > soooo, you know napeoleon is dead right?
    Yes. Otherwise you Yanks wouldn't be getting hung up on the
    phrasing, eh?

    ahhhh, i'm half australian ... mate. me dear mum. maybe we can
    hoist a few victoria bitters next time i'm down under?

    If you're half-Aus then why, oh why are you getting hung up about an
    Australian phrase? Jesus wept, loosen up.

    i was making a joke? anyhow, it's not an australian phrase & would be
    understood in the way you intended anywhere in the USA.
    --
    david reuteler
    [email hidden]

  20. "David Reuteler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    i was making a joke?

    No need for the question mark, it made me snorfle.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply
    Home of the meditative cyclist:
    http://home.earthlink.net/~cpetersky/Welcome.htm
    Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.