So which "journalists" are most likely to have sent Lance supportive communications regarding Walsh and Ballester's book?
I suspect and nominate (but could be wrong and have no definitve knowledge about), in no particular order: 1. Phil Liggett 2. Bob Roll 3. The Pez Cycling Boys 4. Sam Abt 5. John Wilcockson 6. Frankie Andreau 7. Ms. Gum
Those most probably not on the Lance suck list:
1. Walsh and Ballester 2. Journalists from L'Equipe, L'Express, Le Monde 3. Charles Pelkey 4. Paul Kimmage
Nominations remain open. But, as Lance said, you guys know who you are. So stand up and be counted (or is that disounted?)!
You have to add Sal Ruibal of USA Today. He's the lucky "mainstream" guy who gets to write in-depth human interest stories about Lance..
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
So which "journalists" are most likely to have sent Lance supportive communications regarding Walsh and Ballester's book?
I suspect and nominate (but could be wrong and have no definitve knowledge about), in no particular order: 1. Phil Liggett 2. Bob Roll 3. The Pez Cycling Boys 4. Sam Abt 5. John Wilcockson 6. Frankie Andreau 7. Ms. Gum
Those most probably not on the Lance suck list:
1. Walsh and Ballester 2. Journalists from L'Equipe, L'Express, Le Monde 3. Charles Pelkey 4. Paul Kimmage
Nominations remain open. But, as Lance said, you guys know who you are. So stand up and be counted (or is that disounted?)!
