Quoted message said:Quoted message said:What's better for kids: safe bikes or stunt bikes, regardless of how they are ridden?
What is a safe bike?
Presumably one that is well designed and built as opposed to the flimsily built, badly assembled
department store trash the fall apart under the slightest force and when they break they can't be
repaired because of oddball parts or shoddy construction techniques.
Quoted message said:
If a kid is 5-7 years old, the kid is going to have to ride a bike with 20" inch wheels, anything
bigger would require a frame that is too big for the kid.Quoted message said:Obviously, one can do all kinds of fun riding on regular bikes. You don't need a BMX bike to
bunnyhop or do jumps or ride trails (oops, that's not what a BMX bike is designed for).And, sure, it's neat for anyone to try all kinds of bikes, unicycles and the like. But what are
the best bikes for the various HUGE kid's age groups?A BMX what else?
In the UK BMXs are quite popular bikes but tend to be mainly ridden by boys. Girls seem to prefer
mountain bikes either with a girls frame or with a Y frame. BMX type bikes for girls with a dropped
top tube in both
16 inch and 20 inch wheel size ever so common in US are virtually unseen
in the UK and those which do exist are mainly low quality department store types. Even 16 inch boys
/ standard BMXs are not all that common although they were in the 1980s. Most kids in the 4 to 7 age
group ride mountain bikes as they are the most widely available types. The type of bikes you see
kids in the 8 to 16 age group varies with they live in, with those from urban areas tending to own
BMXs and in rural and hilly areas mountain bikes predominate.
Another difference between UK and US bikes is that just about all kids bikes in the UK are fitted
with hand brakes and virtually none are fitted with coaster brakes. Bikes with 10 and 12 inch wheels
usually just have a front brake whereas bikes with 16 and 20 inch wheels always have two brakes.
Anyone suggesting a best all round bike for kids is like someone suggesting a best all round car for
adults. You could develop a car that
is a load lugger for three kids and their stuff, an agile sports car and
an economical runabout around town all at the same time but it would be truly awful and fail to
fulfil all three criteria to the point where nobody would want to buy. The same also applies to kids
bikes. They are best designed for a particular purpose in mind and used for that.
What intrigues me is why gender specific kids bikes still exist, or more
so is there any reason to produce bikes with dropped top tubes for girls
? Almost all girls nowadays wear trousers when riding bikes so there is no reason for them not to
ride a bike with a standard frame. Does anyone
know if girls actually want bikes with dropped top tubes or is it parents insisting they have them
rather than getting bike with a standard or boys frame ?
I was verbally informed a few years ago that girls frame (mountain) bikes tend to devalue more than
boys frame bikes and are more difficult to sell used.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:And, sure, kids will always push the margins of stunting, but do we want to encourage that
aspect in bike design? Do most kids need that or use 1/10th of the intended potential of such
designs?What's the best tech for the biggest bike market: neglect? exploitation? copycatting? toys?
C'mon, can't you put 1/100th of your bike tech interest into the biggest, most significant bike
market?If there was money to be made in the kid's bike market by producing innovative kid's bikes, I
would think that bicycle manufactures would be producing such bikes.
Quite a lot of innovation does go into kids bikes and styles vary from year to year. However much of
this innovation is more cosmetic rather than technical and probably detracts from the riding
quality. Over the past 15 or so years I have seen kids bikes based on cartoons like Action
Man and Pokemon and numerous others fitted with accessories like plastic
mag wheels; plastic spoilers covering the frame; sound and flashing light boxes; plastic disc wheel
covers; chainless drive systems and now the latest must have is suspension.
When it comes to innovation then cost is a prohibitive factor with kids bikes. Quite often the same
piece of technology will cost exactly the same whether it is used on a high end mountain bike or a
kids bike with 16 inch wheels. A conflict of interest often occurs when buying kids bikes. The kid
tends to want the flashiest or the most high tech looking
bike but the parents want the cheapest one because it will be outgrown in a few years time.
Quoted message said:
There are MTBs and BMXs with 20" wheels, what else could you design for kids?
Apart from recumbents or pedal powered car like machines then really it is a decision between a BMX
or a mountain bike.
Quoted message said:There is no way you could have a kids bike with narrow road rims, most kids would destroy them.
How many kids do you see riding road bikes with drop handlebars nowadays
? Virtually none and besides, such bikes are generally unsuitable for kids unless they are distance
riding enthusiasts who have the initiative and the will to treat their bike with respect and service
it regularly.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Is anyone really trying to say that stunting is the fun part of cycling?
I will say this, and so would a lot of people I used to know.
Quoted message said:Stunting offers a quick path to boredom in cycling because it offers the least usefulness.
Have you ever ridden a BMX? Where are you getting this information to make these claims?
Quoted message said:Kids do such stunt-riding today largely because it's part of their exploited pattern of
consumption, not because they're learning about bikes or becoming cyclists or learning about
sustainable culture.Wrong again. Kids do stunt riding because they like to push themselves, they like the rush that
comes from a perfectly executed stunt.
It is a fine recreational activity. I suppose its better for them than watching the telly or playing
video games. You wouldn't believe how many
fat and overweight couch potato kids we have nowadays slobbing around on
the sofa all weekend. If they did stunt riding regularly then they would
burn off much of that blubber.
Quoted message said:BMXers, do not consider themselves cyclists, they consider themselves BMXers.
Quoted message said:What do kids who ride BMX bikes do when they turn 16? -- Stop riding!
I rode a BMX starting at about age 8, then raced BMX from 14-17, then just rode street (BMX) for
another 2 years, then started racing MTB, then Cross, then Road.Quoted message said:What kind of bike probably has the worst results at turning kids into cyclists? --BMX bikes!
OTOH is there any reason for kids to have to become regular road and distance cyclists ? What is
wrong with them just using BMXs and mountain
bikes for local transport in towns and suburbs.
Quoted message said:
A kid is more likely to become a cyclist if he rides a BMX opposed to not riding any bike at all.
I know lots of people that raced BMX that switched to MTB when they got older. There is nothing
wrong with the BMX bike.The problem I have kids bikes is that most people think there is only one size to BMX bikes. Most
people shopping for their kid's bike do not realize that getting the proper size frame is still
important. A BMX is highly adjustable, but getting a BMX with the proper top tube length for your
height will make the bike much easier to handle.
Frame style and the angle between the top tube and the seat stays matter
as well. Freestyle BMXs have smaller frames than standard BMXs so are less suitable for larger kids
and adults to use for general and town riding than standard BMXs. Also some BMXs - that are almost
impossible to find in the UK - have a top tube that slants down heavily towards the
rear of the bike and the angle between it and the seat stays are (almost) 180 degrees. This
configuration allows a lower seat height than normal so that a 6 or even 5 year old can ride one.
Usually the frame is shorter and the handlebar width narrower than normal to accomodate the
dimensions of a smaller rider.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:What do BMX-riding kids do when they want to explore the next town over? -- Find someone to
drive them there in a car!While I can not say I ever rode my BMX further than 20km one way, I definitely rode it all over
town, a lot more than most adults do that have road or MTB bikes. BMXs are not designed to be
ridden over long distances. Most kids will not ride father than 5km no matter what kind of bike
they have, for that matter, most kids these days want to be driven everywhere. So, having the
perfect kid's bike is not going to help anything.
In the UK kids regularly cycle in towns and suburbs and IMO British towns have better facilities for
cyclists than American towns do, but are very rarely ever seen cycling on the main roads linking
towns together because of the dangers of traffic. Some towns are linked to others by pathways or
dedicated cycle paths, sometimes towpaths running alongside canals or built over disused railways
but kids are rarely seen
on them unaccompanied by adults. Fear of abduction, child molesters or violent thugs hangs in the
air nowadays to the point where kids play outside far less than in the past.