Just this guy

"marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Guy, there is a thread in uk.rec.scouting that could do with your input.I
don't want to crosspost it.

Marc - it will not alter the fact that the Scout Association have the rule.
It is they that need convincing - or possibly their insurers. Most people on
there are not disagreeing with you but do not have any say in the matter if
you want to be insured.

Dave

Dave said:

"marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Guy, there is a thread in uk.rec.scouting that could do with your input.I
don't want to crosspost it.

Marc - it will not alter the fact that the Scout Association have the rule.
It is they that need convincing - or possibly their insurers. Most people on
there are not disagreeing with you but do not have any say in the matter if
you want to be insured.

To get the rule changed it needs people willing to challenge it.If there
are people that still believe the "common sense" argument, they need to
be educated, until the SA council are the ones in a minority.

In the referenced article said:

"marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Guy, there is a thread in uk.rec.scouting that could do with your
input.I don't want to crosspost it.

Marc - it will not alter the fact that the Scout Association have
the rule. It is they that need convincing - or possibly their
insurers. Most people on there are not disagreeing with you but do
not have any say in the matter if you want to be insured.

Quite. Point those requiring a change in the rules to:

http://www.cyclehelmets.org/

It's about all you can do. Discussions on the merits of
cycle helmets can get *extremely* polarised.
--
Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
[email hidden]