This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof site but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes as much sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I suppose. Iain
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to school.
Quoted message said:
I looked for some indication this was a spoof site but couldn't see any.
Quoted message said:
Behits next campaign? Makes as much sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I suppose.
It's not a spoof. However the only conclusion is that the numbers are too small to say anything meaningful.
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof site but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes as much sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I suppose. Iain
"CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between children wearing helmets and those not wearing helmets in the incidence of all injuries and head injuries by Xy test. The odds ratio for the no helmet system was 1.26 ( 0.92 to 1.71 for 95 % confidence) for all injuries and 1.46 ( 0.45 to 4.12 for 95 % confidence) for head injuries."
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof site but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes as much sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I suppose. Iain
"CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between children wearing helmets and those not wearing helmets in the incidence of all injuries and head injuries by Xy test. The odds ratio for the no helmet system was 1.26 ( 0.92 to 1.71 for 95 % confidence) for all injuries and 1.46 ( 0.45 to 4.12 for 95 % confidence) for head injuries."
What a surprise.
So of course the schools that currently require walking helmets will immediately make them optional.
Or more likely there will be a campaign to introduce them here following their proven success in Japan.
-- Dave...
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it through not dying. — Woody Allen