Jan Drew lies again

"Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Alternative Med People
From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
Date: 12/28/2003 3:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

<[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

PM > >The only place you will find any data is on his supporter's web

site,

Quoted message said:

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

that is uninterpretable very short term follow-up claiming a 65%

remision

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

rate with brain tumours already treated by other means.

JD> Five year follow up.

Jan lies!! Yet again she lies.

Look at
http://www.burzynskipatientgroup.org/cancernews.html

and show me where five year follow-up is mentioned. They are even

actually

Quoted message said:

specified as phase 11 studies which are very short term studies, usually

of

Quoted message said:

only a few months, designed to show if there is any anti-cancer effect at
all. Why aren't we allowed to know how many of these patients are still
alive even a year later?

Burzinski sits back on his bum, gives no information on his web site,
publishes nothing in either peer-reviewed journals or the "alternative"
journals, and allows his supporters to quote figures giving the impression
of a high cure rate becasue most people won't know how to interpret them.
I know that. he knows exactly what he is doing, even if Jan doesn't.

Peter Moran

Of course the myth of FDA/AMA/Gummint/WHO suppression of effective cancer
cures works beautifully to make it unnecessary for quacks like Burzynski to
respond to such criticism. Any attack at all on their actitivites can be
blamed on the conspiracy.

Few outside medicine have any idea what ethical medical and authentic
scientific behaviour looks like. Thus the most specious of excuses for
deceptive practices will be accepted, especially by those also driven by
desperation.

Peter Moran

Quoted message said:

Isn't there a question of him using the Ph.d title after his M.D.?
Something about when his credentials were checked with his University
back "in the old country", such a program was not available until after
he came to the U.S.?

BTW, I didn't mean to imply that he couldn't have gotten use of that
title elsewhere in the intervening 30+ years; only what the end of the
story actually was.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

BTW, I didn't mean to imply that he couldn't have gotten use of that
title elsewhere in the intervening 30+ years; only what the end of the
story actually was.

There are those that misuse their "degrees" and those who outright lie about
them.

Recently, a net loon by the name of Betty Martini began being addressed as
Dr. Betty Martini and is now claiming that she has an honorary degree.

Even assuming that is so, and I have found indication of wherre she
allegedly was allegedly granted this honorary dergee, calling oneself "Dr."
is an act of hubris.

However, I suspect that she recevied her honorary title from the same school
that Hulda got her mail order degree.