(Mark) said:WB <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:...knows no bounds.
The relentless self-aggrandizement of Drewster only serves
to discredit her positions and sources.
jD is the source of *most* of the wagons of manure that is MHA.
Comments ?
WB
Actually, I don't think I've ever seen her actually contribute much to
the discussion aside from screeching "Liar!!" and waving her arms
about -- when she gets them loose of her straightjacket, that is.
Oh come on Mark. Let's not sell Jan Drew short. She also has screeched
stalker, drug pusher, accused people of being members of EEEEEEEVIL
organized medicine, accused me of leading nudie hikes, etc. Jan has
quite a repertoire when it comes to disparaging others with her false
accusations (bearing false witness).
Quoted message said:
Mostly, she serves as a beautiful (I've seen her picture, therefore I
use the term figuratively
But have you seen her toothless smile??
Quoted message said:Entertainment value, I'll grant. Information source? Naaah...
I completely disagree. I think Jan is a great source of information.
She serves as a illuminating cautionary tale. After all how often do
you get such a complete history of someone who obviously is
somatically hypervigilant, highly suggestible, and has powerful
placebo responses that are only transient.
I think readers can learn much from Jan Drew. They can also learn much
about themselves. Jan Drew is very good at triggering hot spots in
people. One can use the angry reaction toward her to learn a great
deal about yourself.
The trick is to realize that Jan Drew is a very sick (in all senses of
the word) woman who will attack you personally if you disagree with
her POV. The other trick is to realize that it is a complete exercise
in futility trying to engage in a meaningful discussion with her. You
either agree with her POV and get on her good side or you disagree
with her and become Satanically possessed (in her mind).
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Mark, MD
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance.
