It's a small world...........

Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

(Spider) said:

Nobody is forcing you to read or reply to any of this, or any other post. You choose to paint
yourself as an imbecile in USENET. Don't blame anyone else for that. Trying to change someone who
doesn't want to change is a fool's errand. Are you a fool, or are you as bright as you seem to
think you are?

Spider (who knows a fool's errand when he writes one. *sigh*)

mmmm, I love the smell of irony! specially over a holiday....

Dave (like Sunday beer)

Uh, Dave? It's great that you recognize something when someone explains it to you. You may wish
to read again the parenthetical remarks that I made. I am guessing that you believe you are the
soul of wit.

Spider

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

BB <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> On 31 Aug 2003 21:10:37 GMT, MTBScottie wrote:
>
> > The wife looked at me and said, "Tell him I said hello, and that it must be great to be a
> > world reknown idiot!"
>
> Yeah sure, and I met Elvis yesterday.

Why do you find this so hard to believe?

Too convenient. I just doesn't *sound* real.

Quoted message said:

Gee, could JD actually be a [censored] in real life too?

But he isn't. I've met him. Neither you nor Stupidski have.

As I stated, Jeffry Dahmer had his friends. David Koresh too. Those people thought Koresh was the
cat ass.

And what does that have to do with the price of OEM Shimano XT parts?

The simple fact is that the JD of USENET is not the JD of Real Life(tm.)

USENET is full of all sorts of whackjobs who can hide behind a keyboard and be someone they're not.
If JD want to be one of them, what can *you* do about it? That's right, nothing. You can only do
something about *you*.

Quoted message said:

JD was very polite to me in private email as a fellow WebTv user. When I questioned his rudness to
posters, I was suddenly put on his [censored] list.

Yeah, so? You said your piece, and now you reap the reward. Life's all about choices.

Quoted message said:

You can continue to condone his behavior and wipe his ass.

Well, I would have remembered wiping his ass, and I don't think I got that drunk. Actually, I think
I was getting friendly with Paladin, but I just can't remember...

In any case, I do not condone or condemn his posting behavior, because I can do nothing to change
it. That's REALITY, RW, like it or not.

Quoted message said:

Some of us choose to go our own way and not kowtow to some Usenet [censored].

Yes, I can see that you are plenty tough. It's easy on USENET. Tough guys are a dime a dozen until
you get their noses unglued from their CRTs.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

He was very polite to all the other trail users, and to the rest of our group. So, as Duhski
says, if you haven't been there in person, you don't know [censored]. (Paraphrase from his bike
testing whines.)

Kind of like JD's not riding all the bikes he comments on, eh?

You have applied your brain properly to the analogy.

This is the Duhski method of worldly interpretation. Frankly, I thought you were smarter than to
cast your lot in with the likes of Spanky and DogPoop - but if it takes you to carry their water, it
makes no difference to me. I just don't think there's much future to
it. After all, you're not going to cahnge anything, and you only look like a fool for trying.

BTW, if you want to claim the moral high ground on a.m-b flaming, I suggest you stop doing it
yourself. The righteous don't wear hypocrisy that well...

Spider

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

little ricky white scribbled in caryon:

Quoted message said:

Gee, could JD actually be a [censored] in real life too?

I can tell you this, ricky. If you were in Fruita (like that'll ever happen because you are a
gutless piece of [censored]) and rode off trail in front of me, I would laugh, as I have been laughing
at all fools on bikes the last five years or so. So, if laughing at barneys is being a [censored],
then I am the biggest [censored] you could ever imagine. Now go hump someone else's leg, muttface.

If I was in Fruita, the only thing you would doing is sucking my [censored].

You'd have to sprout one first there, little ricky.

JD

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: It's a small world........... From: [email hidden] (JD) Date: 9/1/2003 7:56 PM
Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>... <snip a hilarios rambling pisser of a
"paragraph">

Oh, I feel sooo discredited. Please stop spanking me!

Quoted message said:

I went on to explain that I knew who he was, and the couple was in total amazement.

This is by far the funniest part because you have absolutely no idea who or what I am. Keep
humping away, howdy eat my doody.

JD

The funny part is that I meet two strangers on the East Coast and describe you just as you act on
this discussion group. If you act different in person then you do on the internet, that only
discredits you even more.

Yup, you are as clueless as ever. It's impossible to be discredited by a faceless piece of [censored],
especially a sidewalk riding one.

JD

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> BB <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:<[email hidden]>...
> > On 31 Aug 2003 21:10:37 GMT, MTBScottie wrote:
> >
> > > The wife looked at me and said, "Tell him I said hello, and that it must be great to be
> > > a world reknown idiot!"
> >
> > Yeah sure, and I met Elvis yesterday.
>
> Why do you find this so hard to believe?

Too convenient. I just doesn't *sound* real.

> Gee, could JD actually be a [censored] in real life too?

But he isn't. I've met him. Neither you nor Stupidski have.

As I stated, Jeffry Dahmer had his friends. David Koresh too. Those people thought Koresh was
the cat ass.

And what does that have to do with the price of OEM Shimano XT parts?

The simple fact is that the JD of USENET is not the JD of Real Life(tm.)

USENET is full of all sorts of whackjobs who can hide behind a keyboard and be someone they're
not. If JD want to be one of them, what can *you* do about it? That's right, nothing. You can only
do something about *you*.

Quoted message said:

JD was very polite to me in private email as a fellow WebTv user. When I questioned his rudness
to posters, I was suddenly put on his [censored] list.

Yeah, so? You said your piece, and now you reap the reward. Life's all about choices.

Quoted message said:

You can continue to condone his behavior and wipe his ass.

Well, I would have remembered wiping his ass, and I don't think I got that drunk. Actually, I
think I was getting friendly with Paladin, but I just can't remember...

In any case, I do not condone or condemn his posting behavior, because I can do nothing to change
it. That's REALITY, RW, like it or not.

Quoted message said:

Some of us choose to go our own way and not kowtow to some Usenet [censored].

Yes, I can see that you are plenty tough. It's easy on USENET. Tough guys are a dime a dozen until
you get their noses unglued from their CRTs.

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

He was very polite to all the other trail users, and to the rest of our group. So, as Duhski
says, if you haven't been there in person, you don't know [censored]. (Paraphrase from his bike
testing whines.)

Kind of like JD's not riding all the bikes he comments on, eh?

You have applied your brain properly to the analogy.

This is the Duhski method of worldly interpretation. Frankly, I thought you were smarter than to
cast your lot in with the likes of Spanky and DogPoop - but if it takes you to carry their water,
it makes no difference to me. I just don't think there's much future to
it. After all, you're not going to cahnge anything, and you only look like a fool for trying.

BTW, if you want to claim the moral high ground on a.m-b flaming, I suggest you stop doing it
yourself. The righteous don't wear hypocrisy that well...

Spider

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

>But he isn't. I've met him. Neither you nor Stupidski have.

That isn't the point. It's how he, and actually you, act towards others on the group.

Spider and JD's other lackeys are too afraid to question his stupid antics, lest they become a
target of his critism.

Heh. Another short-term memory loss patient. Google would solve that, if you knew how to use it.

Yeah, I Google Dave W. and find you.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Think of Spider as Scut Farcas's sidekick. He's got to play along as he's too afraid of getting
his own ass whipped.

Let me ask you this:

What is the functional difference between JD flaming someone and what you have done in this post?

JD flames a poster (newbie) for asking a simple question. AFAIK, I've never done that.

When I was a newbie and on Webtv to boot, JD would email me asking me not to leave am-b because I
had been in flame wars with more experianced posters and he didn't want all the webtv people being
run off. Now, as soon as a newbie posts, he's all over their ass for being stupid (in his opinion)
and they post a little, then give up.

Quoted message said:

I'll wait for the good hypocrite to be courageous and admit his logical error, or try and attempt
more obfuscation. RW, you may want to think twice about that - I know my way around.

See above.

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination. Maybe we should forego Idaho and go there to ride
next Summer. Yeah, leave it to a kerr like you to hyde in a [censored] like clearfield. Maybe
being the town
psycho there has its rewards though. I'm sure everyone "knows" you in a barney one bullet burg
like that.

JD

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination.

That's a HUGE insult! I get tired of hearing about your size, your military rank, and how nice you
are in person. You're just as your prototype Spider described, a Usenet wuss that only acts like
this behind the keyboard. Then again, the folks I met this weekend illustrated how one person can
shape an opinion of a town.

Quoted message said:

Maybe we should forego Idaho and go there to ride next Summer.

Please do, there would be lots to do for you daughter. OOOOOPPSSS, I forgot, you claim to be a good
father, but all you really do is galavant across the country and support her with money, and claim
that you are a good father.

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> >But he isn't. I've met him. Neither you nor Stupidski have.
>
> That isn't the point. It's how he, and actually you, act towards others on the group.

Spider and JD's other lackeys are too afraid to question his stupid antics, lest they become a
target of his critism.

Heh. Another short-term memory loss patient. Google would solve that, if you knew how to use it.

Yeah, I Google Dave W. and find you.

I google JD and find you. So what?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Think of Spider as Scut Farcas's sidekick. He's got to play along as he's too afraid of
getting his own ass whipped.

Let me ask you this:

What is the functional difference between JD flaming someone and what you have done in
this post?

JD flames a poster (newbie) for asking a simple question. AFAIK, I've never done that.

So, flaming isn't the problem, but who gets flamed is. That's an artificial distinction that I don't
recognize as significant. If you are whining about somebody being an [censored], being one yourself
carries no moral authority.

Quoted message said:

When I was a newbie and on Webtv to boot, JD would email me asking me not to leave am-b because I
had been in flame wars with more experianced posters and he didn't want all the webtv people being
run off. Now, as soon as a newbie posts, he's all over their ass for being stupid (in his opinion)
and they post a little, then give up.

But some don't. The fact is, too many people come to view USENET as some magical "free answer zone."
Frankly, if they don't like the iniation, they don't have to join the club. Anyone who lurks for a
few days could figure out that this ng has a certain cast of characters.

If you're not adult enough to take some heat for a dumb question, then you shouldn't be hanging out
in USENET.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'll wait for the good hypocrite to be courageous and admit his logical error, or try and
attempt more obfuscation. RW, you may want to think twice about that - I know my way around.

See above.

Sorry, but I don't accept your artificial distinction. But it is a very nice weasel.

Spider

[email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination.

That's a HUGE insult! I get tired of hearing about your size, your military rank, and how nice you
are in person.

The reason you keep hearing it is because *you* are being an [censored]. If you don't like [censored] in
a.m-b., why do you insist on being one?

Quoted message said:

You're just as your prototype Spider described, a Usenet wuss that only acts like this behind the
keyboard.

And you are different, how?

Quoted message said:

Then again, the folks I met this weekend illustrated how one person can shape an opinion of
a town.

Except that this "meeting" never actually happened. You just made the whole thing up.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Maybe we should forego Idaho and go there to ride next Summer.

[snip lameness]

You sure are courageous behind your keyboard there, tough guy.

Come to ID next year to see if you can hack real MTB terrain. I can hear the excuses already...

Spider

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination.

No, it's not. That's why we don't have all the trail issues that you are always crying about. Sucks
to be you .

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination.

See, that's why you're such a putz. The trails here are uncrowded. Devoid of pussies like you who
have to keep crying about access, off-trail riding, barnies, etc. Keep enjoying your overcrowded
biking hotspot while I enjoy the solitude of unknown and underused trails.

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

So I'm travelling along Interstate 90 yesterday, headed to the Cleveland Air Show. I stopped at a
rest stop to get something to drink. On the way out,

<snip the poor fiction>

Quoted message said:

LOL! Loving every minute of it!

Even *if* this event happened, then your "friends" were probably royally destructive barney fools
that deserved some constructive instruction. Maybe even a decent ass-whuppin. If we don't speak up,
then these idiots get our trails closed.

I yelled at an idiot to get a helmet one afternoon. Half an hour later I was patching up his bloody
mug, (risking Aids and who knows what, mind you) because he was a clueless fool.)

So this gal was riding Fruita trails after a month on a mountainbike? Come on, even a
veracity-challenged, fabricating prevaricator like yourself can do better than that.

Besides, the more you rail at JD, (whom you haven't even met) the smaller you shrink and the greener
with envy you appear.

To Spider, you're good at this flame-fest bizness, but be careful who you invite to Idaho. My
razorback hog back at the trailer has standards regarding the company its willing to keep.

Paladin

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> [email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
> news:<[email hidden]>...
> > >But he isn't. I've met him. Neither you nor Stupidski have.
> >
> > That isn't the point. It's how he, and actually you, act towards others on the group.
>
> Spider and JD's other lackeys are too afraid to question his stupid antics, lest they become
> a target of his critism.

Heh. Another short-term memory loss patient. Google would solve that, if you knew how to
use it.

Yeah, I Google Dave W. and find you.

I google JD and find you. So what?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Think of Spider as Scut Farcas's sidekick. He's got to play along as he's too afraid of
> getting his own ass whipped.

Let me ask you this:

What is the functional difference between JD flaming someone and what you have done in this
post?

JD flames a poster (newbie) for asking a simple question. AFAIK, I've never done that.

So, flaming isn't the problem, but who gets flamed is. That's an artificial distinction that I
don't recognize as significant.

Good for you. Others see it differently.

Quoted message said:

If you are whining about somebody being an [censored], being one yourself carries no moral authority.

Said the pot.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

When I was a newbie and on Webtv to boot, JD would email me asking me not to leave am-b because
I had been in flame wars with more experianced posters and he didn't want all the webtv people
being run off. Now, as soon as a newbie posts, he's all over their ass for being stupid (in his
opinion) and they post a little, then give up.

But some don't. The fact is, too many people come to view USENET as some magical "free answer
zone." Frankly, if they don't like the iniation, they don't have to join the club. Anyone who
lurks for a few days could figure out that this ng has a certain cast of characters.

If you're not adult enough to take some heat for a dumb question, then you shouldn't be hanging
out in USENET.

So who gets to deterime what's dumb and what's not? JD? You?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'll wait for the good hypocrite to be courageous and admit his logical error, or try and
attempt more obfuscation. RW, you may want to think twice about that - I know my way around.

See above.

Sorry, but I don't accept your artificial distinction. But it is a very nice weasel.

Others do. Your influence on what I percieve to be true is insignificant. Keep following Farcas.

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (JD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Dickie White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> I'm in Clearfiled, Pa whenever you want to unglue me.

Oh, that's a HUGE mountain biking destination.

That's a HUGE insult! I get tired of hearing about your size, your military rank, and how nice
you are in person.

The reason you keep hearing it is because *you* are being an [censored]. If you don't like [censored]
in a.m-b., why do you insist on being one?

Quoted message said:

You're just as your prototype Spider described, a Usenet wuss that only acts like this behind
the keyboard.

And you are different, how?

Quoted message said:

Then again, the folks I met this weekend illustrated how one person can shape an opinion of a
town.

Except that this "meeting" never actually happened. You just made the whole thing up.

If wrenches in State College have heard of Mike " ", why would it be so impossible for this
encounter to have occurred?

(Paladin) said:

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

So I'm travelling along Interstate 90 yesterday, headed to the Cleveland Air Show. I stopped at a
rest stop to get something to drink. On the way out,

<snip the poor fiction>

Quoted message said:

LOL! Loving every minute of it!

Even *if* this event happened, then your "friends" were probably royally destructive barney fools
that deserved some constructive instruction. Maybe even a decent ass-whuppin. If we don't speak up,
then these idiots get our trails closed.

I yelled at an idiot to get a helmet one afternoon. Half an hour later I was patching up his bloody
mug, (risking Aids and who knows what, mind you) because he was a clueless fool.)

So this gal was riding Fruita trails after a month on a mountainbike? Come on, even a
veracity-challenged, fabricating prevaricator like yourself can do better than that.

Besides, the more you rail at JD, (whom you haven't even met) the smaller you shrink and the
greener with envy you appear.

To Spider, you're good at this flame-fest bizness, but be careful who you invite to Idaho. My
razorback hog back at the trailer has standards regarding the company its willing to keep.

Paladin

them hawgs make for some good vittles...

Dave (shot one between the eyes once!)

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> What is the functional difference between JD flaming someone and what you have done in this
> post?

JD flames a poster (newbie) for asking a simple question. AFAIK, I've never done that.

So, flaming isn't the problem, but who gets flamed is. That's an artificial distinction that I
don't recognize as significant.

Good for you. Others see it differently.

Other people also think the world is flat, and that the moon landings were faked. I don't put much
stock in what any particular group of people think.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If you are whining about somebody being an [censored], being one yourself carries no moral
authority.

Said the pot.

Heh. I'm not whining about anyone being an [censored]. I'm not posting [censored] about it, or calling
names about it, or any other thing. So, it is *not* actually the pot calling the kettle black, but
exposing your hypocrisy on the issue.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

When I was a newbie and on Webtv to boot, JD would email me asking me not to leave am-b
because I had been in flame wars with more experianced posters and he didn't want all the
webtv people being run off. Now, as soon as a newbie posts, he's all over their ass for being
stupid (in his opinion) and they post a little, then give up.

But some don't. The fact is, too many people come to view USENET as some magical "free answer
zone." Frankly, if they don't like the iniation, they don't have to join the club. Anyone who
lurks for a few days could figure out that this ng has a certain cast of characters.

If you're not adult enough to take some heat for a dumb question, then you shouldn't be hanging
out in USENET.

So who gets to deterime what's dumb and what's not? JD? You?

Yes. And you, and Duhski and anyone else. There are plenty of people who have trouble with what the
"alt" in the newsgroup hierarchy means, and you seem to be one of them. If you or he or anyone else
doesn't like my methods or posts, you are quite free to learn to operate your newsreader in a manner
that facilitates filtering on authors or content - or both.

I have posed some dumb questions in USENET, and taken heat. Life is hard. I got over it. What's
your excuse?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> I'll wait for the good hypocrite to be courageous and admit his logical error, or try and
> attempt more obfuscation. RW, you may want to think twice about that - I know my way around.

See above.

Sorry, but I don't accept your artificial distinction. But it is a very nice weasel.

Others do.

Reference faked moon landings.

Quoted message said:

Your influence on what I percieve to be true is insignificant.

Ahh, but I am not trying to influence you in any way. As I have said before, in case you weren't
paying attention, I do not believe that you can change anybody who does not wish to change, and in
USENET, the only real influence someone has is on themselves. Having a laugh at the expense of the
hypocritical fools who think that they can stop flaming by flaming is all part of this great medium
that provides so much enjoyment.

I speak to you about logic because I had imagined that you would be able to discern logical truth
from logical fallacy. I am sorry that I was wrong.

Spider

[email hidden] (R.White) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Spider) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Except that this "meeting" never actually happened. You just made the whole thing up.

If wrenches in State College have heard of Mike " ", why would it be so impossible for this
encounter to have occurred?

I am considering the source and the message. Impossible? No. Highly improbable, in the realm of
fiction? Most certainly.

Spider

[email hidden] (MTBScottie) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: It's a small world........... From: [email hidden] (Spider) Date: 9/4/2003
4:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Paladin) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

To Spider, you're good at this flame-fest bizness, but be careful who you invite to Idaho. My
razorback hog back at the trailer has standards regarding the company its willing to keep.

If I had any idea that he actual had the stones to back up the [censored] that he spewed, I'd be
right with you. But like most every other USENET punk, he doesn't have any guts unless he's
parked in front of a PC.

Your continuting this ridiculous back and forth conversation only shows that you are just another
USENET punk.

No, I actually walk the walk. And at 6500', 15 miles in, I was walking a lot.

But still, you're just a punk who's all tough in USENET. When you show up in person, I'd love to see
how tough you are. But you won't, because you're a coward.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Any [censored], snot-nosed kid can be tough in USENET.

You have proven that.....

Oh, but Spanky, I've never tried to be tough. Thanks for playing, though.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Besides, I'd love to see him show up and see all his so-called MTB "skills".

I don't have anything to prove to anyone about my skills.

Sure you do. You pretend to know something, and flail about giving advice, so you sure do have
something to prove.

Quoted message said:

Just for the hell of it though, I plan on posting some pictues of the "sidewalks" I ride. I think
you'll find they are abnormally more narrow, rockier, steeper and a bit more mud then you would
find on normal sidewalks.

Anybody can d/l pictures of places off the web, Stupidski.

Quoted message said:

Keep on responding, my last communication with you....

You make all kinds of promises you can't keep.

Spider

Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

(Spider) said:

Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On 1 Sep 2003 16:41:09 -0700, [email hidden] (Spider) wrote:

>Nobody is forcing you to read or reply to any of this, or any other post. You choose to paint
>yourself as an imbecile in USENET. Don't blame anyone else for that. Trying to change someone
>who doesn't want to change is a fool's errand. Are you a fool, or are you as bright as you
>seem to think you are?
>
>Spider (who knows a fool's errand when he writes one. *sigh*)

mmmm, I love the smell of irony! specially over a holiday....

Dave (like Sunday beer)

Uh, Dave? It's great that you recognize something when someone explains it to you. You may wish
to read again the parenthetical remarks that I made. I am guessing that you believe you are the
soul of wit.

Spider

so now you'd like to tell me what I should and shouldn't believe.

Obviously you can't read. I'm not surprised.

Hump away, stoner.

Spider