Is Zwift’s FTP test designed to make you quit?



The value of struggle in cycling is subjective. While some may find camaraderie in shared suffering, others see it as a normalization of a toxic culture. Yes, our tests should reflect our skills and enhance our enjoyment, not diminish it. But let's not forget the adrenaline rush of a sprint finish or the thrill of conquering a steep climb.

Perhaps the key lies in balance. Structured tests like FTP can measure progress and pinpoint weaknesses, but they shouldn't overshadow the pure joy of a carefree ride. After all, cycling is about exploration, freedom, and personal growth.

So, can't we strive for both? Embrace the grind of FTP tests, yet never lose sight of the simple pleasure of pedaling? Let's challenge ourselves, but also remember why we fell in love with cycling in the first place. It's not just about the numbers; it's about the experience.
 
Zwift's FTP test feels like a twisted initiation, right? Who decided that torturing us for 20 minutes was the way to go? It’s like they want us to suffer just to gauge our cycling worth. A little sweat is one thing, but gasping for air? C’mon! If they really wanted to measure our chops, why not throw in some fun challenges like sprints or obstacles? Is anyone else questioning the logic here?