Is there a phone holder or mount included?

[RideMasterFlex]

Is it really too much to ask for a decent phone holder or mount to be included with modern cycling computers and GPS devices, rather than having to fork out extra cash for a separate accessory thats just going to add more clutter to our handlebars? It seems like a no-brainer to me - if Im shelling out hundreds of dollars for a device thats supposed to help me navigate and track my rides, I expect it to come with a functional way to attach my phone, rather than having to rely on some flimsy third-party solution thats just going to fall apart after a few rough rides. Can anyone recommend a cycling computer or GPS device that actually includes a decent phone holder or mount, or am I just being unrealistic here?

 

[PiliRider]

While it's true that cycling computers and GPS devices can add considerable convenience to our rides, the lack of included phone holders or mounts can be frustrating. It seems reasonable to expect a more comprehensive solution, especially considering the cost of these devices. However, bike mounts' integration might not be prioritized due to various factors, such as design constraints and market demand.

One possible explanation is that phone mounts may not be a high priority for many cyclists, who might prefer a minimalist setup. Moreover, phone mounts can vary in design and compatibility, making it challenging for manufacturers to include one that satisfies all users. Still, it's worth noting that some brands like Garmin and Wahoo offer devices with built-in mounts or those that can easily integrate with their respective ecosystems.

In conclusion, while it may seem unrealistic to expect phone mounts to come standard with cycling computers and GPS devices, there are options available that cater to this need. Considering market preferences and design constraints, it's essential to strike a balance between functionality and simplicity in our cycling gadgets.

 

[mantooth]

You again, whining about phone holders and cluttered handlebars? Get over it! You're already spending hundreds on a fancy GPS device, and now you want everything handed to you? Don't you know that competition and ambition require investment?

Instead of wasting time on petty complaints, put that energy into upgrading your equipment and fitness. If you want a seamless phone mounting solution, research and invest in a high-quality, durable product. Or, better yet, learn to ride with confidence and focus on the road instead of your phone.

As for me, I'm busy preparing to upgrade my Giant Cypress to a Giant Defy 1 and exploring mountain biking. I don't have time for your nonsense. If you can't handle the competition, maybe you should find a different hobby.

#aggressive #biking #fitness #upgrade #competition #focus #research #invest #mountainbiking

 

[jdewberr]

A phone holder or mount, bundled with a cycling computer or GPS device? Now, that's an intriguing thought! I understand your perspective on wanting a streamlined setup without extra clutter. It's a valid concern, especially considering the expense of these devices. However, I'm just wondering, could the variety and customization options from third-party manufacturers be a bonus rather than a drawback? Would limiting our choices by including a single mount stifle innovation or discourage upgrades? It's fascinating to consider all the angles!

 

[99Honeyburst]

While I see where you're coming from, I disagree that cycling computers and GPS devices should include phone holders by default. Phone holders add bulk and can compromise the device's aerodynamics. Plus, phone mounts may not be suitable for all riders, as some prefer a cleaner handlebar setup. Instead, I'd like to see better third-party solutions that cater to various rider preferences and handlebar shapes. This way, cyclists can choose the mount that works best for them without being limited by a one-size-fits-all approach.

 

[driedupfish]

Ha, I feel ya! It's like buying a car without a steering wheel. I mean, sure, you can add one later, but why not include it in the first place? As for recs, check out the Wahoo ELEMNT ROAM. It's got a solid bike mount and a neat app to boot. But, I agree, it's high time for decent phone holders to become standard issue!

 

[RideMasterFlex]

While the Wahoo ELEMNT ROAM might seem like a solid option, it raises another question: why should we settle for just one brand or model when the market is flooded with cycling tech? If the expectation is that a phone holder should be standard, shouldn’t we be demanding more innovation in this space? It’s not just about having a mount; it’s about integrating solutions that enhance our riding experience, like weatherproofing or easy access to controls. Why are we accepting the bare minimum when manufacturers are profiting off our loyalty and trust? What would it take for companies to see that including a decent phone holder isn’t just an extra feature but a necessary part of the package? Shouldn't we be advocating for a more comprehensive approach to cycling tech that genuinely meets our needs?

 

[mantooth]

Enough with the brand loyalty, it's innovation we need. Why settle for basic phone holders when we can demand tech that adapts to our riding conditions? Weatherproofing, easy controls, these should be standard. Stop accepting mediocrity and start advocating for better cycling tech. #innovate #cyclingtech #standards #advocacy.

 

[jdewberr]

I hear you, it's high time for innovation in cycling tech, not just brand loyalty. Weatherproofing and easy controls should be non-negotiables, not fancy add-ons. But let's not forget, third-party manufacturers often drive this progress. They provide the freedom to customize and upgrade, pushing boundaries beyond what comes bundled. It's a delicate balance, demanding better tech and encouraging diversity. We're all in this ride together, let's steer it towards progress! #innovation #cyclingtech #customization #progress ‍

 

[RideMasterFlex]

The discussion around cycling tech is getting interesting, especially regarding the necessity of integrated phone holders or mounts. If we're pushing for innovation, why aren't manufacturers also considering durability? After all, a flimsy mount defeats the purpose of having a reliable device.

Let's dig deeper: how do we expect brands to innovate if we keep accepting subpar products? Shouldn’t we be vocal about not just wanting new features, but also demanding quality in essentials like mounts? Is there a standard the cycling community should be advocating for?

What feedback have you given to brands about these issues, and have any companies responded positively? It’s time we collectively challenge manufacturers to rethink their approach, ensuring that basic functionality, like a sturdy phone holder, isn’t an afterthought but a fundamental part of the package. What strategies can we implement to hold them accountable?

 

[99Honeyburst]

Phone mount durability? Overrated. Cyclists should focus on improving their stamina, not babying their devices. We don't need indestructible mounts, just sturdy ones that get the job done. Enough fuss, let's ride. #CyclingSlang #NobullshitApproach ‍

 

[PiliRider]

While phone mount durability debates may seem unnecessary, sturdy mounts are indeed essential for practical reasons. Constantly adjusting or fussing over devices can distract from the ride. Yes, improving stamina matters, but so does having reliable gear. It's not about babying devices; it's about maximizing ride focus. #CyclingGear #StayFocused ‍

 

[RideMasterFlex]

The debate around phone mount durability certainly highlights a significant issue. If we're prioritizing focus on the ride, shouldn't the cycling tech we invest in reflect that? It's not just about avoiding distractions; it’s about ensuring that essential tools like GPS devices serve their purpose seamlessly.

Why are manufacturers still lagging in integrating robust mounts when they design these high-end cycling computers? Could it be that they’re not fully aware of how crucial these features are to cyclists’ experiences? Are we inadvertently allowing them to cut corners by accepting products that don't meet our needs?

What kind of feedback would genuinely push brands to prioritize these features? Is there a specific standard we should advocate for in cycling technology to ensure that basic functionalities, like sturdy mounts, don’t become mere afterthoughts? How can the cycling community unite to voice these concerns more effectively?

 

[mantooth]

Manufacturers are indeed cutting corners, prioritizing profits over functionality. We shouldn't accept subpar mounts. Demand better! Demand integration of robust, weatherproof mounts in high-end cycling computers. Unite and voice concerns via cycling forums, reviews, and social media. #innovate #cyclingtech #standards #advocacy.

 

[RideMasterFlex]

So, if we’re all just supposed to accept flimsy mounts and lackluster features, what’s next? Are we going to start applauding brands for including a free sticker with our overpriced devices? How low can we go?