General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

is "candida albicans" A REAL MEDICAL CONDITION?

Started by Barb28 · · Last activity · 5 posts · 3,232 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 May 2004
Last activity
8 May 2004
Original author
Barb28
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,232
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello, I would like to ask if "candida alibicans" is a
    'real' medical condition? I am attempting to get a
    traditional opinion from a traditional medical doctor. I
    know there are lots of alternative type people on the
    internet, but I would like to know what a regular doctor
    would say?

    His medical test, from a regular lab (not one of the
    alternative labs), says the

    candida ab IGG 1.59 (results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGA 2.04 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGM 1.14 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    I was just wondering if I could get someone elses
    opinion on this?

    He has not had any rashes or itching or breakouts (or
    whatever candida does), so it is probably an internal thing.

    The sheet that came from the lab, had a long paragraph that
    basically downplayed candida.

    Thank you for your time.

  2. barb28 said:

    Hello, I would like to ask if "candida alibicans" is a
    'real' medical condition? I am attempting to get a
    traditional opinion from a traditional medical doctor. I
    know there are lots of alternative type people on the
    internet, but I would like to know what a regular doctor
    would say?

    His medical test, from a regular lab (not one of the
    alternative labs), says the

    candida ab IGG 1.59 (results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGA 2.04 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGM 1.14 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    I was just wondering if I could get someone elses opinion
    on this?

    He has not had any rashes or itching or breakouts
    (or whatever candida does), so it is probably an
    internal thing.

    The sheet that came from the lab, had a long paragraph
    that basically downplayed candida.

    Thank you for your time.

    Candida is a type of yeast. Infections with candida
    are very common in people taking broad-spectrum
    antibiotics for a prolonged period (over a couple of
    weeks) because the antibiotics change the normal
    bacterial flora in the GI and GU systems, allowing
    for overgrowth of non-susceptible organisms. They
    can also overgrow in people with poor or supressed
    immune systems or poor nutritional status. Generally
    in and of themselves they are more a nuisance than a
    serious problem (burning and itching), but they may
    point out immunologic or other problems that should
    be addressed. Where were the candida cultured from?

    Steve (dentist)

  3. barb28 said:

    Hello, I would like to ask if "candida alibicans" is a
    'real' medical condition? I am attempting to get a
    traditional opinion from a traditional medical doctor. I
    know there are lots of alternative type people on the
    internet, but I would like to know what a regular doctor
    would say?

    His medical test, from a regular lab (not one of the
    alternative labs), says the

    candida ab IGG 1.59 (results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGA 2.04 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGM 1.14 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    I was just wondering if I could get someone elses opinion
    on this?

    He has not had any rashes or itching or breakouts
    (or whatever candida does), so it is probably an
    internal thing.

    The sheet that came from the lab, had a long paragraph
    that basically downplayed candida.

    Thank you for your time.

    The short answer to your question (in the way I think you
    mean it) is "no, it's not a real medical condition." That's
    the answer to the question "do followers of scientific
    medicine believe in 'The Yeast Connection', 'systemic yeast
    syndrome', and related disorders?"

    Candida albicans is a real organism -- it's the cause of
    vaginal yeast infections and various other problems, and
    when it grows in the blood it can rapidly be fatal (this
    pretty much only happens in people who are already severely
    ill with some other problem).

    But having antibodies to candida is normal and of no
    diagnostic value, and there is no reason to believe that
    someone with antibodies to candida has a problem with
    candida. So again, in the way I think you mean it, it
    (systemic yeast syndrome) is not a "real" condidtion.

    --
    David Rind [email hidden]

  4. David Rind said:

    But having antibodies to candida is normal and of no
    diagnostic value, and there is no reason to believe that
    someone with antibodies to candida has a problem with
    candida. So again, in the way I think you mean it, it
    (systemic yeast syndrome) is not a "real" condidtion.

    Good answer. :-)

  5. David Rind said:
    barb28 said:

    Hello, I would like to ask if "candida alibicans" is a
    'real' medical condition? I am attempting to get a
    traditional opinion from a traditional medical doctor. I
    know there are lots of alternative type people on the
    internet, but I would like to know what a regular doctor
    would say?

    His medical test, from a regular lab (not one of the
    alternative labs), says the

    candida ab IGG 1.59 (results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGA 2.04 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    candida ab IGM 1.14 {results say anything over 1.00 is
    positive)

    I was just wondering if I could get someone elses
    opinion on this?

    He has not had any rashes or itching or breakouts (or
    whatever candida does), so it is probably an internal
    thing.

    The sheet that came from the lab, had a long paragraph
    that basically downplayed candida.

    Thank you for your time.

    The short answer to your question (in the way I think you
    mean it) is "no, it's not a real medical condition."
    That's the answer to the question "do followers of
    scientific medicine believe in 'The Yeast Connection',
    'systemic yeast syndrome', and related disorders?"

    Candida albicans is a real organism -- it's the cause of
    vaginal yeast infections and various other problems, and
    when it grows in the blood it can rapidly be fatal (this
    pretty much only happens in people who are already
    severely ill with some other problem).

    But having antibodies to candida is normal and of no
    diagnostic value, and there is no reason to believe that
    someone with antibodies to candida has a problem with
    candida. So again, in the way I think you mean it, it
    (systemic yeast syndrome) is not a "real" condidtion.

    --
    David Rind [email hidden]

    Thanks for cutting to the meat. I hadn't even noticed
    that the OP referenced immunologic tests.

    Steve

    --
    Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
    Brooklyn, NY
    718-258-5001
    dentaltwins.comdentaltwins.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.