General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Insulin Action Peak Time Estimate

Started by Jim Dumas · · Last activity · 5 posts · 2,007 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 January 2004
Last activity
13 January 2004
Original author
Jim Dumas
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,007
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just want to say that one of my observations while using the Glucose
    Transform to investigate Novolog, lispro and human R action was:

    The peak insulin action occurs "in the neighborhood" of a BG arounf 150 mg/dl. The has to do with
    the product of BG with insulin action in the differential equation. I have yet to prove this
    mathematically. But will return to this eventually. Also note that GI tract absorption is assumed to
    be zero (so called post-absorptive state from an overnight fast).

    So my rule of thumb for estimating peak insulin action, from a GI tract post-absorptive BG profile,
    is the point where BG falls through 150 mg/dl
    (8.3 mmol/l). The "in the neighborhood" is similar to complex variable theory for a point on the
    complex plane.

    This observation permits everybody to easily estimate the insulin action peak from a simple
    BG profile free fall. You will probably find the action peak is much later than you had
    initially thought.

    Merry Xmas,
    --
    Jim Dumas T1 4/86, background retinopathy, rarely hypoglycemic: <1/mo. lispro+R+U+NPH daily,
    moderate exercise, typically <6% HbA1c

  2. I looked on your site j-dumas.home.mindspring.comj-dumas.home.mindspring.com and must admit that you have done a lot of
    work. I'm just wondering, if the "two peak" profile, which you present for novolog is not just
    result of incorect fit of the glucose curve?!? I.e. you write, that you use "8th order least square
    fit", do you mean that you used a polynom of order 8 (i.e. X^8)?? Just the use of polynom of such an
    high order can cause the "two peak effect". Have you tried to fit some lower order polynom? The
    result should be very different after the transformation...

    BTW, probably with the polynomial fit you should be able to calculate an analytical solution to the
    minimal model and by correct estimation (propagation) of errors you shold be able to estimate the
    precision of the result...

    I just don't belive that an insulin shot can have two peaks...

    Igor

  3. Igor said:

    I looked on your site j-dumas.home.mindspring.comj-dumas.home.mindspring.com and must admit that you have done a lot
    of work. I'm just wondering, if the "two peak" profile, which you present for novolog is not just
    result of incorect fit of the glucose curve?!? I.e. you write, that you use "8th order least
    square fit", do you mean that you used a polynom of order 8 (i.e. X^8)?? Just the use of polynom
    of such an high order can cause the "two peak effect". Have you tried to fit some lower order
    polynom? The result should be very different after the transformation...

    BTW, probably with the polynomial fit you should be able to calculate an analytical solution to
    the minimal model and by correct estimation (propagation) of errors you shold be able to estimate
    the precision of the result...

    I just don't belive that an insulin shot can have two peaks...

    Hi Igor,

    I remember seeing a graph that Dr Anderson of Eli Lilly had on Humulin R pharmacodynamics, (glucose
    disposal from an insulin dose, not insulin in the bloodstream from the dose), it had double and
    triple peaks. This was umpublished glucose-clamp data that Dr Anderson, (MD now in charge of
    worldwide clinical trials for the Humulin insulin product line), would quietly show other MDs at the
    American Diabetes Association convention about 10 years ago. You have to remember the liver uses
    about 60% of total insulin and it turns on and off as it builds glycogen stores. This modulating
    effect causes multiple peaks in glucose uptake in the normal subjects used in these studies (so no
    long-term antibody binding delay effects in these subjects). So two or three peaks is not unusual in
    the glucose infusion profile for normal subjects. Now add in injection site differences, (the Lilly
    data was for abdominal injection sites that are warm/constant temperature so fast, constant
    absorption from the subcutaneous tissue happens), where the SC absorption is modulated by
    vasodilation/constriction (capillary size changes from temperature) and glucose disposal has more
    noise in the data. Finally, add antibody binding effects and multiple peaks are the norm. So if I
    see a single peak insulin action profile, I'd say it was theoretical and not real measured data.
    This can easily be seen in glucose-clamp dextrose infusion profiles to prove the point.

    Next, the order of the polynomial fit is chosen to keep physiological parameters believable. One
    parameter used is the glucose uptake by the brain (CNS). Many polynomial fits are "almost perfect"
    but show the CNS is sourcing glucose instead of using glucose. The liver and GI tract are the only
    organs that can source glucose. So this "near perfect" polynomial fit fails on a physiological basis
    and is marked as incorrect in a search algorithm. So you pick the "best" polynomial fit on a
    physiological basis.

    HTH,
    --
    Jim Dumas T1 4/86, background retinopathy, rarely hypoglycemic: <1/mo. lispro+R+U+NPH daily,
    moderate exercise, typically <6% HbA1c

  4. (Igor) said:

    I looked on your site j-dumas.home.mindspring.comj-dumas.home.mindspring.com and must admit that you have done a lot
    of work. I'm just wondering, if the "two peak" profile, which you present for novolog is not just
    result of incorect fit of the glucose curve?!? I.e. you write, that you use "8th order least square
    fit", do you mean that you used a polynom of order 8 (i.e. X^8)?? Just the use of polynom of such
    an high order can cause the "two peak effect". Have you tried to fit some lower order polynom? The
    result should be very different after the transformation...

    BTW, probably with the polynomial fit you should be able to calculate an analytical solution to the
    minimal model and by correct estimation (propagation) of errors you shold be able to estimate the
    precision of the result...

    I just don't belive that an insulin shot can have two peaks...

    Igor

    I took published action curves and checked my personal fit to the data. Then did a numerical
    integration of the data and normalized this data. Derived the "insulin used and "the insulin still
    available". It proved to be very useful. A spread sheet is a useful tool. once you enter some good
    numerical data.

    The numerical integration is nothing but summing up the small increments and normalized the data.
    Normalizing put the data on a base that allow comparison. Normalized data allows comparison insulin
    with different action times.

    Too old to do much now but it provided a very useful tool and was educational.

    Some data on activity seems to be some ones imagination. Guy

  5. Igor said:

    Just the use of polynom of such an high order can cause the "two peak effect". Have you tried to
    fit some lower order polynom? The result should be very different after the transformation...

    Just to say that the polynomial curve fit checks orders 4 to 16 as it stands today. The most
    physiological curve fit is chosen. Also note that the Bergman Minimal Model is corrected for renal
    loss and CNS loss of glucose. The CNS loss is inversely proportional to BG(time=0). Bergman's model
    has too much CNS loss for all BG. You must correct the glucose disposal differential equation for
    this error.

    So yes. Small polynomial orders are analyzed as well.
    --
    Jim Dumas T1 4/86, background retinopathy, rarely hypoglycemic: <1/mo. lispro+R+U+NPH daily,
    moderate exercise, typically <6% HbA1c

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.