General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Insignificant Summits

Started by Roger · · Last activity · 5 posts · 141 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 May 2007
Last activity
11 May 2007
Original author
Roger
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
141
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was out Back o'Skiddaw yesterday (Wednesday) and as I plodded along
    the Cumbria Way below Mungrisdale Common I pondered (as one does) on
    what motivated AW to put such insignificant prominences in his books
    while leave marginally more significant summits out. If it was just
    Mungrisdale Common then I would accept the notion that that particular
    inclusion was a joke but such summits are almost commonplace in his
    books.

    So why MC but not Sale How, Bakestall but not Little Calva?

    The OS (or perhaps their informed sources) are not adverse to muddying
    the waters either. Later in the day I passed over Little Lingy Hill but
    very nearly unintentionally missed it out. A more insignificant summit
    would be hard to find. A small mound in the wide col between 2 more
    prominent hummocks. Knott to the SW (a Marilyn no less) and to the NE
    what appears to be named inappropriately as "Pile of Stones" but seeing
    it is adjacent to Great Lingy Hill probably has a better claim to the
    'Little Lingy' title than the present incumbent. Pile of Stones used to
    be a 2000 foot summit but has suffered the indignity of demotion by
    metrication and aerial survey to a mere 609m (1998 feet). Personally I
    would rather trust the accuracy of a small contour ring established by
    levelling rather than a height lifted off a stereoscopic photo.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  2. In message <[email hidden]>, Roger
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I was out Back o'Skiddaw yesterday (Wednesday) and as I plodded along
    the Cumbria Way below Mungrisdale Common I pondered (as one does) on
    what motivated AW to put such insignificant prominences in his books
    while leave marginally more significant summits out. If it was just
    Mungrisdale Common then I would accept the notion that that particular
    inclusion was a joke but such summits are almost commonplace in his books.

    So why MC but not Sale How, Bakestall but not Little Calva?

    A lot of the insignificant summits in Wainright's Guides are explicable
    on the grounds that they are prominent from the valley. For example
    Bakestall is a ridge end, but Sale How is a lump on the flank of Skiddaw
    and Little Calva is on a shoulder of Great Calva.
    --
    Stewart Robert Hinsley

  3. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Stewart Robert Hinsley <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    A lot of the insignificant summits in Wainright's Guides are explicable
    on the grounds that they are prominent from the valley. For example
    Bakestall is a ridge end, but Sale How is a lump on the flank of Skiddaw
    and Little Calva is on a shoulder of Great Calva.

    I have used that argument myself in the past but not for Bakestall v.
    Little Calva. ISTM that in that case you have the descriptions reversed.
    Little Calva is a much more prominent ridge end, at least in terms of
    both volume and height below its larger neighbour and even makes the
    Nuttalls list.

    AW himself says of Bakestall "It would pass almost without comment but
    for its command of a scene of extra-ordinary interest ..." and of Little
    Calva "a place of little interest" but even his contempt for Little
    Calva is not so great as that for Mungrisdale Common.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  4. On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:33:35 +0100, Roger <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    If it was just
    Mungrisdale Common then I would accept the notion that that particular
    inclusion was a joke but such summits are almost commonplace in his
    books.

    he was probably a little eccentric.
    --
    Mike Reid
    UK walking, food, photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Spain walking, food, tourism "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk"
    Beginners UK flight sim addons "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"

  5. "Roger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was out Back o'Skiddaw yesterday (Wednesday) and as I plodded along
    the Cumbria Way below Mungrisdale Common I pondered (as one does) on
    what motivated AW to put such insignificant prominences in his books
    while leave marginally more significant summits out. If it was just
    Mungrisdale Common then I would accept the notion that that particular
    inclusion was a joke but such summits are almost commonplace in his
    books.
    <SNIP> --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

    When I did MC years ago, I thought it was an insignifcant bump, I only knew
    I was there (pre GPS days BTW) because of a few stones cairn. I always
    though Wainwright picked that spot because of the view southwards. I
    remember (but took no photos - almost pre digital camera days) the vew
    southwards in gap between Lonscale and Blease Fell quite pleasing

    Jhimmy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.