Power meters · Public discussion

Indoor Trainer Speed to Power?

Started by cbjesseeNH · · Last activity · 4 posts · 3,895 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
13 June 2005
Last activity
13 July 2005
Original author
cbjesseeNH
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,895
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sorry if this is old thinking, but it seems that if the speed vs power relationship is known for a trainer (as in web.archive.orgtrainerpower), then one should be able to capture speed with SRM, PT or Polar and calculate power.

    Am I missing other major factors? One has to assume the speed vs power data are accurate.

    Especially for Polar, which is reputed to suffer error with indoor trainers, this might be an error correction, calibration or replacement power calculation method for indoor trainer use.

    Thanks for the comments.

    BRET

  2. cbjesseeNH said:

    Sorry if this is old thinking, but it seems that if the speed vs power relationship is known for a trainer (as in web.archive.orgtrainerpower), then one should be able to capture speed with SRM, PT or Polar and calculate power.

    True. If the speed vs. power relationship is known one may calculate power from speed on a trainer. The issue is that there are a number of variable s to contend with (changes in humidity, temp, etc) that will affect power calculations. Also, unless your trainer is specificaly called out on the url you reference you're still "guesstimating".

    DK

  3. you

    dkrenik said:

    True. If the speed vs. power relationship is known one may calculate power from speed on a trainer. The issue is that there are a number of variable s to contend with (changes in humidity, temp, etc) that will affect power calculations. Also, unless your trainer is specificaly called out on the url you reference you're still "guesstimating".

    DK

    Also, even if your model is on the chart, without testing several of the same model, there's no way to tell how much variation there is between one unit and the next for a particular trainer model. I just got a 1Up trainer and I'm curious about the variation since I don't have a power meter, and I wondre how accurate these power curves are to determine a rough figure of work done on the trainer.

  4. robgreen said:

    I'm curious about the variation since I don't have a power meter, and I wondre how accurate these power curves are to determine a rough figure of work done on the trainer.


    I have a Kurt Kinetic Road Machine trainer and a Polar S720 with the power unit. When I do indoor trainer rides, I collect both the Polar power data and the implied power based on the Kurt Kinetic Road Machine speed-to-power relationship (available both from their web site, as well as the aforementioned URL) and plot them on a chart. The Polar power unit definitely exhibits its ring/hub specific sensitivity and inaccuracy when on the trainer, so I go mostly by the implied power. Here are two of my workouts where you can see both power curves (in the power chart, the dark blue line is the trainer power and light blue is the Polar power):

    http://www.employees.org/~bozceri/training/20050704T221058.05562.srd.html
    http://www.employees.org/~bozceri/training/20050705T225650.07758.srd.html

    Just for the sake of completeness, the Polar power does appear to be right on the money when used on the road, though:

    http://www.employees.org/~bozceri/training/20050712T183833.09580.srd.html#distance

    Berend

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.