UK and Europe · Public discussion

Independant Comment

Started by Don Whybrow · · Last activity · 4 posts · 339 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
5 December 2006
Last activity
12 December 2006
Original author
Don Whybrow
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
339
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mr Daley appears to have written something with a clue.

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article2037767.ece

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    Sense is not cognition but sensation. (Douglas Robinson)

  2. On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:27:57 +0000, Don Whybrow pointed to:

    Quoted message said:

    Mr Daley appears to have written something with a clue.

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article2037767.ece

    "most gutter cycle lanes are a mere metre-and-a-half wide" -- I think he
    confuses metres and feet!

    The rest seems OK though.

    Mike

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article2037767.ece

    Quoted message said:

    The rest seems OK though.

    [of cycling along the Thames] "bicycle highways such as this are perhaps
    the only way of providing a safe cycling network."

    I've always considered the roads fairly safe - peds have a greater KSI
    rate.

    He also misses the other big problems with cycle lanes:

    -They encourage cyclists to 'undertake' vehicles, where they're squished.
    -They emcourage cyclists to ride in the door zone, where they faceplant
    into a lump of metal and glass, fall into the road, and get squished.
    -They disappear at junctions, where we're most likely to get squished.

    Understandable I s'pose - he's got a word limit after all. Good to see an
    article that isn't unthinkingly calling for more.

  4. Mark Thompson

    pleasegivegenerously@warmmail*_turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article2037767.ece

    Quoted message said:

    The rest seems OK though.

    [of cycling along the Thames] "bicycle highways such as this are perhaps
    the only way of providing a safe cycling network."

    I've always considered the roads fairly safe - peds have a greater KSI
    rate.

    He also misses the other big problems with cycle lanes:

    -They encourage cyclists to 'undertake' vehicles, where they're squished.
    -They emcourage cyclists to ride in the door zone, where they faceplant
    into a lump of metal and glass, fall into the road, and get squished.
    -They disappear at junctions, where we're most likely to get squished.

    Understandable I s'pose - he's got a word limit after all. Good to see an
    article that isn't unthinkingly calling for more.

    yes it is true some (cycle paths) do wiggle all over the place, well
    meening i'm sure but fairly useless or at least of limited value.

    roger

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.