General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

In Wisconsin - The "Narrative" Says It All...

Started by Tim Bolen · · Last activity · 4 posts · 597 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 March 2004
Last activity
28 March 2004
Original author
Tim Bolen
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
597
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In Wisconsin - The "Narrative" Says It All...

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    Friday March 26, 2004

    Finding the Suster case (Wisconsin DRL v. Suster) was like
    finding gold. For in it, are all the elements wherein health
    insurance companies are involved in the suppression of new
    things in health care. Below is a "Narrative" recently filed
    in that DRL v. Suster case. It says a lot about the
    corruption in our Administrative Law system.

    The "Narrative" also points out how sleazy health
    insurance companies really are, and how far they'll go to
    NOT pay claims.

    I've always said that those people who have to rely on
    Medicare suffer, because they are restricted, due to an
    antiquated approval process, to health offerings that are,
    at their newest, fifteen (15) years old. Health insurance
    companies, in my opinion, are not much better in their
    offerings for similar reasons - and offer nothing newer than
    seven (7) to ten (10) years old.

    In response to this vacuum in health care offerings, what's
    known as "Alternative Medicine" has taken over 50% of the
    total US health care dollar away from the medical complex -
    and Americans are paying for these services out-of-pocket.
    Health Insurance companies are slow to wake up to reality,
    and instead of embracing health paradigms Americans are
    buying, they pull stunts like the one described in the
    "Narrative."

    Stuart Suster MD is a man, who at great risk to himself (he
    is now getting DEATH THREATS), tried to get health insurance
    companies to recognize the benefits of, and pay for, new
    health paradigms. Look what's happened - so far...

    I doubt we'll see any change, in the near future, in the way
    health insurance companies operate.

    The Suster case is, in my opinion, a landmark. It brings up
    legal issues, involving the Administrative Law process
    itself, rules regarding the conduct of prosecutors, and it
    spotlights health insurance companies' improper use of the
    Administrative licensing hearing to simply NOT PAY CLAIMS by
    threatening the health professional's very existence. If you
    are interested in reading these legal issues, read the
    "RESPONDENT'S POST-HEARING CLOSING ARGUMENT BRIEF FOR
    PROPOSED DECISION BY ALJ" by going to www.quackpotwatch.org,
    and clicking on the new newsletter.

    Here is the "Narrative..."

    STUART M. SUSTER, M.D., Respondent Case No.: 00MED272,
    LS-0210291-MED

    NARRATIVE ATTACHED TO RESPONDENT'S POST- HEARING CLOSING
    ARGUMENT BRIEF FOR PROPOSED DECISION BY ALJ

    I am Stuart Suster MD, a pain management expert practicing
    in the greater Milwaukee, WI area. My advertisements state
    "When you've been everywhere else and nothing worked – come
    here…" I offer newer, and comprehensive, methods towards
    pain management. I have significant training in this area
    (see exhibit A – Curriculum Vitae Stuart Suster
    MD), have completed significant research in this area, and
    follow the best of Federal and the University of
    Wisconsin Guidelines (see exhibit B – UW Pain Management
    Guidelines) in pain management.

    I, Stuart Suster MD, operate on the "cutting edge" of pain
    management – and that is the problem. As a colleague of mine
    once said "It's bloody on the cutting edge…"

    I am under assault because I exercised my legal rights,
    insisting that health insurance companies pay, and pay
    reasonable amounts, for my services to my patients. Indeed I
    hired the best experts I could find to assist me in properly
    billing for my services. I followed their advice, and the
    guidelines of the American Medical Association, in all of my
    billing practices. One of my experts has since been
    appointed by Wisconsin Governor James Doyle as the Insurance
    Commissioner for the State of Wisconsin. He was not allowed
    to testify at my hearing – since I was allowed NO DEFENSE
    witnesses.

    I am under assault by an unscrupulous employee of the
    Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing (DRL), one
    Arthur Thexton, who, within that department, holds the
    position of Prosecutor in the Health section of the Division
    of Enforcement. Thexton is well known for his attacks on
    Wisconsin "cutting edge" practitioners – and has been
    recently disciplined, and reined-in for this activity,
    openly, and very publicly, by new DRL management, Secretary
    Donsia Strong Hill for his activities in other cases.
    Indeed, Thexton has been ordered by his department "not to
    talk to the media about his cases." Donsia Strong Hill, said
    of Thexton in an earlier case (DRL v. Kadile) "What I
    inherited were a group of prosecutors who basically had
    functioned in the past with very little supervision over
    them or direction or even the establishment of priorities,"
    Strong Hill said. "We certainly have changed that." When
    Madison CBS News 3 asked Strong Hill, "You're supervising
    them more closely?" She responded, "They are definitely
    being supervised more closely." Those earlier cases, three
    of them, all of which Thexton lost, pointed out that Thexton
    has connections to, and adheres to the policies of, a
    national organization known as the "quackbusters." The
    "quackbusters" rail against anything new in health care.
    Their "bible," a website called "quackwatch.com," is
    operated out of a basement in Allentown, Pennsylvania by one
    Stephen Barrett MD, a man who hasn't been licensed to
    practice medicine in any State, since 1993. Their
    "flagship," the so-called National Council Against Health
    Fraud (NCAHF) is operated out of the current NCAHF
    president's business, a hair removal and ear piercing salon
    in Braintree, Massachusetts.

    I need relief.

    Thexton, a well known power abuser, has recently, because of
    other cases involving other cutting-edge practitioners, been
    reined in, but that is no help to me in my current
    situation. I may be the last case where he is allowed to
    abuse someone, using his power, but it is unfair to me that
    I have to continue this process, at my own emotional and
    financial expense, after, so-to-speak, "the barn door has
    been shut."

    I am not being prosecuted, as it were, in a justified
    administrative hearing. I am being persecuted by a known
    abuser, an unethical, unscrupulous member of a national
    crackpot organization (the quackbusters) dedicated to
    stamping out new things in health care – Arthur Thexton.

    Arthur Thexton has used extraordinary means to stop me in my
    attempt to be properly paid for my services by health
    insurance companies. On this, world-renowned Consumer
    Advocate Tim Bolen wrote, in his Millions of Health Freedom
    Fighters – Newsletter, that:

    I see cases against practitioners all over North America,
    and the Wisconsin DRL v. Suster case is, by far, the worst
    thing I've ever seen anywhere. Thexton, for this case alone,
    should lose his job at DRL, and his license to practice law,
    for what he's done to Stuart and Mary Suster. Ruby Jefferson
    Moore, the so-called Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), in the
    case, deserves some serious review..., if not legal
    disbarment, herself.

    Thexton, a well known ABUSER, in the Suster case, pulled out
    all the stops. Thexton used his position at DRL to act on
    behalf of a group of health insurance companies involved in
    a billing dispute with Stuart Suster MD. When Suster failed
    to heed Thexton's warnings to "back off" on his attempts to
    collect money owed him, Thexton began a series of events,
    using his position at DRL, to destroy Stuart Suster.
    Thexton's actions were so blatant on behalf of health
    insurance providers that DRL, and police agencies, would do
    well to examine Thexton's finances.

    Thexton's actions smell of "payoff." In summary:

    (1) First, Thexton accused Suster of being mentally
    unstable, and "using drugs," forcing Suster to undergo
    Psychiatric and Drug evaluation. While Suster was
    undergoing this humiliation, Thexton called the
    evaluator, attempting to influence the outcome. Suster
    easily passed the evaluation. When that attempt
    failed, Thexton moved to step

    (2) Thexton went to the media to ruin Suster's
    practice, and then

    (3) went to police agencies trying to get Suster arrested.
    When that didn't work, and police agencies rebuffed
    Thexton, Thexton

    (4) in a "secret hearing" filed eleven counts against
    Suster with the Wisconsin medical board. The eleven
    "counts" include over 50 accusations of criminal
    activity which had been rejected for prosecution by the
    appropriate police agencies. The new accusations

    misconduct. Thexton then

    (5) went back to the media with the new accusations, asking
    the people of Milwaukee to "call the TV Station, the
    DRL, the FBI, the DEA, or the local police if they knew
    anything about Suster."

    (6) Then, when Suster complained about Thexton's
    manipulations, Thexton ordered so-called witnesses
    "not to talk to Suster - although they were talking to
    the media." Then

    (7) Thexton, with Ruby Jefferson Moore, conspired to
    eliminate "due process" from the so-called
    Administrative Hearing, going so far as to not allow
    Suster to cross-examine witnesses against him, nor call
    any witnesses in his own defense. All the while,
    Thexton had the TV station broadcast Thexton's
    commentary about the hearing on a daily basis.

    (8) Thexton, working in conjunction with Stephen Barrett
    of quackwatch.com, broadcast the whole bogus
    accusation/hearing situation worldwide.

    And, the Susters are trying to recover from this.

    Thexton is the one, you will remember, who UNSUCCESSFULLY
    prosecuted Wisconsin leading-edge practitioner Eleazor
    Kadile MD using nationally known CRACKPOT Robert S. Baratz
    as his do-all, be-all "expert witness." Thexton also tried
    to prosecute, Eleazar's wife Genial (a Nutritionist), but an
    Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) threw out that spurious
    attack. Thexton also "investigated" Robert Waters MD, for
    about eight years. Thexton's superiors at DRL removed
    Thexton from the Waters case, and the new prosecutor dropped
    the investigation within a week.

    New DRL management has, after examining Thexton's actions in
    other cases, made significant policy changes, reining in
    Thexton. Thexton has a history of abuse.

    Bolen has a readership of over 200,000 for his newsletter
    and his websites. He is a consultant nationwide, and is on
    a "first-name basis" with DRL management, and Wisconsin
    legislators. He is considered to be an expert in the
    politics of health care in the United States. The whole
    article he sent out, entitled "The Stuart Suster MD Case -
    the Most Sadistic, Vicious, and Cruel So-Called
    Prosecution I've Ever Seen…" can be read, in its entirety
    at quackpotwatch.orgSuster2.htm.
    I have also enclosed a copy of the entire article as
    (Exhibit C).

    A second article, detailing Bolen's concerns about the
    health insurance industry's ability to shortcut the
    Wisconsin DRL process, and misuse the Licensing Hearing
    to deny, and discourage, health billings by
    practitioners, is added as (Exhibit D). It can be found
    on the internet at quackpotwatch.orgopinionp
    ieces/WisconsinTestCase.htm.

    There is significant reason, in this case, to suspect, and
    call for an investigation of, "Foul Play."

    (9) There are, in Wisconsin Regulations for the practice
    of law, specific rules prohibiting prosecutors from
    doing exactly what Arthur Thexton did, in my case.
    Thexton's relationship with the media RUINED my
    practice, and my good name, long before I ever had a
    hearing on the issues.
    (10) I am being persecuted BECAUSE I exercised my rights
    under the law. Not only have I gone out of my way to
    get expert assistance in my billing issues, but I
    filed the claims against the health insurance
    companies following THEIR EXACT procedures, then
    moved on to using the Employee Retirement Income
    Security (ERISA) guidelines. I AM STILL IN THAT
    PROCESS. Thexton, and the insurance companies have
    conspired to bypass that process, using the DRL
    licensing hearing to change to a friendlier venue
    (forum shopping) – one under Thexton's control. I
    have over three hundred cases, totaling over a
    million dollars in billing, going through the ERISA
    appeals process. Thexton, working on behalf of the
    health insurance industry, in an improper venue, is
    attempting to castrate the United States government
    Department of Labor ERISA claims process.
    (11) The Wisconsin Medical Examining Board, for over a
    year, has been unable to come up with "Pain
    Management" guidelines. Evidence of this is clear
    in their meeting minutes. How can I BE PROSECUTED
    FOR VIOLATING PAIN MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES THAT DO
    NOT EXIST?
    (12) Arthur Thexton brought against me, and used as the
    official "Case Advisor," a pain management
    specialist, and Medical Examining Board member, who
    is a geographical competitor to me in the greater
    Wisconsin area. This is a definite conflict of
    interest. This case advisor carried the case against
    me to the board, and also acted as the witness. He
    has since benefited from my loss of patients, due to
    the media coverage by Milwaukee Fox 6 TV.
    (13) Arthur Thexton took over 100 names of my patients,
    names he got from several health insurance providers,
    to Fox 6 TV. The TV station invited them all to a
    meeting where those that attended, all formerly HAPPY
    patients of mine, were indoctrinated by Thexton,
    health insurance so-called "fraud" investigators, and
    local TV personages to believe that there were
    significant criminal acts being committed in

    these patients, prior to this indoctrination had ever voiced
    a complaint, except that "my insurance company doesn't want
    to pay for my treatment here..." Thexton wrote a "release"
    to be used by Fox 6 TV, where all of the patients gave Fox
    TV 6, Thexton, and the insurance companies access to their
    complete medical records, anywhere, and everywhere (Exhibit
    E). Since that indoctrination meeting, several formally
    HAPPY patients have come to believe that I am a criminal –
    and refuse to communicate with me. All of my formerly HAPPY
    patients showed marked improvement in their pain issues
    during my treatment of them.
    (14) Arthur Thexton, working with Fox 6 TV, convinced a
    formerly HAPPY patient to act in an illegal manner,
    coming into my office to argue over "her bill." with
    a concealed TV camera. The purpose of the visit was
    to embarrass me on Milwaukee TV, and further
    Thexton's previous unfounded assertion that I was
    "loud and angry." The TV station played this
    recording, and interviews gleaned from other
    indoctrinated formally HAPPY patients, continuously.
    This severely damaged my business, my personal
    reputation, and has brought me several DEATH THREATS
    (Exhibit F).
    (15) Arthur Thexton convinced my formally HAPPY
    patients that my

    pain need comforting, and a sense that there is hope ahead
    for relief. I, and my staff, provide, in every case, that
    emotional support. "Touching," sometimes called "Therapeutic
    Touch," is one of our techniques. It is our office policy to
    hug our patients, make eye contact, and to act in a warm,
    friendly, but firm about following the treatment plan,
    manner. Thexton's crackpot "quackbuster" organization rails
    against "Therapeutic Touch," although he, Thexton, is well
    aware that the University of Wisconsin teaches "Therapeutic
    Touch" on campus. Office policy also dictates that at no
    time am I ever alone with a female patient. Thexton is also
    aware that I suffer significant physical limitations, and
    limited range of motion, in that

    misconduct," are preposterous – and simply NOT POSSIBLE.
    (16) Arthur Thexton has intentionally misconstrued, for
    purposes of unwarranted prosecution, several aspects
    of my pain management program for my patients. "Pain
    Management" is not an easy specialty, in that most
    patients can, and do, become too reliant on, and
    sometimes addicted to, dangerous drugs – opiates.
    Care must be taken that the patient follow the EXACT
    guidelines I set out for them in their personal
    treatment plan. It is part of my treatment policy to
    have the patient bring in their medication at each
    visit, and hand their pills to the office nurse, who
    will count the pills to insure that the right amount
    has been taken, and that there are none "missing."
    When I change a patient's medication, for whatever
    reason, I impound the old medication. These opiates
    are dangerous by themselves, and worse, when
    improperly combined by a patient involved in chronic
    pain, and not thinking clearly. Thexton, without
    justification, has attempted to suggest about those
    impounded pills, that I am "either taking the pills
    myself, or selling them out the back door…"
    (17) I was recently invited to, and attended a meeting in
    the State capitol, where over a dozen "cutting-edge"
    Wisconsin health practitioners were discussing the
    proper ways, in the proper venues, to file complaints
    against Arthur Thexton, and another State DRL
    prosecutor named James Polewski, both of which were,
    and are, "quackbusters," regarding a statewide
    "pattern of abuse," Those complaints are forthcoming,
    and will have a bearing on Thexton's credibility.
    There are, I believe, SIX separate complaints being
    filed against Thexton, each going to three separate
    agencies. Committee members are meeting with
    ?Wisconsin legislators regarding the abuse issues.
    (18)Arthur Thexton conspired with Ruby Jefferson Moore, the
    Wisconsin DRL Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to deny me
    any semblance of "due process," in my administrative
    case. This case is a "railroad." As Consumer Advocate
    Tim Bolen so aptly explains "Thexton, with Ruby
    Jefferson Moore, conspired to eliminate "due process"
    from the so-called Administrative Hearing, going so far
    as to not allow Suster to cross-examine witnesses
    against him, nor call any witnesses in his own defense.
    All the while, Thexton had the TV station broadcast
    Thexton's commentary about the hearing on a daily
    basis." All this is true. But there is more in the
    complaint - much more.

    I am one more victim of Arthur Thexton, in his quest to rid
    the world of those, who in his crackpot "quackbuster" view
    of health care, need to be stopped by any means. And,
    Arthur Thexton is capable of using "any means," and has
    done so in my case.

    Stuart Suster MD Sunday, March 21, 2004 Milwaukee, WI

    -----------------------------------
    Stay tuned...

    Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate

  2. "Tim Bolen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In Wisconsin - The "Narrative" Says It All...

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    Friday March 26, 2004

    Finding the Suster case (Wisconsin DRL v. Suster)

    Suster is charged with:

    #Improperly prescribing controlled drugs.

    #Improperly touching 16 women, including seven whose breasts
    he grabbed or fondled when they were in his office and two
    he kissed while they were receiving "electrostimulation
    treatment" in a reclining chair.

    #Threatening to injure four patients.

    #Improperly fondling the scrotum of a male patient who had
    complained of constipation. #Using an improper procedure
    code to bill ten insurance companies for approximately $1
    million more than they might pay for properly coded claims
    for treatment with a Dynatron machine.

    #Excessive billing in six cases, in some of which he charged
    both the patient and the patient's insurance company for the
    same services.

    #Billing third-party payers for a total of more than 24
    hours of physician-patient contact time on four dates.

    #Substandard practice, including inadequate record-keeping,
    in treating three patients. #Failing to comply with an order
    given in 2001 by Wisconsin Medical Examining Board order
    that he undergo to a five-day residential evaluation. The
    order was issued after several patients complained that he
    had spoken to them in an angry and loud manner, using
    language inappropriate for a physician. According to the
    charges, he underwent the evaluation but refused to release
    the required report to the Board.

    An undercover investigation by a TV station found that he
    was "...committing blatant emotional and psychological
    abuse to his patients. As the investigation continued, more
    and more evidence pointed to shady business practices and
    questionable medical techniques practiced by Dr.
    Suster...." Thus, it is not EOM that file dthe complaint,
    but a respnsible state agency that saw the evidence. You
    can see it too:

    notes.ire.orgc07b92821d821549862
    56ccb007537fc?OpenDocument

    WITI reported on the trial:

    fox6milwaukee.comfox6milwaukee.com Search on Suster....

    Snippets from the above:

    "During the first three days of hearings, Suster frequently
    disrupted testimony with angry outbursts. He yelled at
    witnesses and threatened both the judge and the state's
    prosecuting attorney, using derogatory names and profanity-
    laced tirades. The doctor's behavior includes:

    Monday-- Suster told the judge she was "completely out of
    order," he accused one of the witnesses of testifying while
    under the influence of alcohol, and he started clapping
    loudly during the proceedings.

    Tuesday-- Suster told the prosecuting attorney he would be
    "terminated" after the hearing, and he also told the
    prosecutor to "Go to hell!" He instructed a witness to
    answer his questions or "I'm going to bring down holy hell."

    Wednesday-- Suster told the judge "You aint gonna survive,"
    he called the prosecutor a "yo-yo," and he repeatedly cursed
    at those in the hearing room and declared all of the state's
    witnesses are liars who are conspiring against him."

    " The Pain Doctor Stands Trial WEEK 1 -- Outrageous Behavior
    Dr. Stuart Suster will be escorted out of his disciplinary
    hearing if he continues to engage in disruptive
    behavior, according to the judge presiding over the
    case. Administrative Law Judge Ruby Jefferson-Moore
    explained new "rules of conduct" Thursday morning -- the
    fourth day of a trial which will determine whether
    Suster will keep his medical license.

    Suster faces eleven counts of unprofessional conduct
    involving dozens of former patients at Great Lakes Pain
    Center, the doctor's Wauwatosa pain

    injure patients. The State Department of Regulation and
    Licensing filed the complaint against Suster following a year-
    long undercover investigation by FOX 6 News.

    During the first three days of hearings, Suster frequently
    disrupted testimony with angry outbursts. He yelled at
    witnesses and threatened both the judge and the state's
    prosecuting attorney, using derogatory names and profanity-
    laced tirades. The doctor's behavior includes:

    Monday-- Suster told the judge she was "completely out of
    order," he accused one of the witnesses of testifying while
    under the influence of alcohol, and he started clapping
    loudly during the proceedings.

    Tuesday-- Suster told the prosecuting attorney he would be
    "terminated" after the hearing, and he also told the
    prosecutor to "Go to hell!" He instructed a witness to
    answer his questions or "I'm going to bring down holy hell."

    Wednesday-- Suster told the judge "You aint gonna survive,"
    he called the prosecutor a "yo-yo," and he repeatedly cursed
    at those in the hearing room and declared all of the state's
    witnesses are liars who are conspiring against him.

    Each day the Department of Regulation and Licensing called
    State Capitol Police to restore order to the hearing.
    Officers did not arrest Suster, but they did present a
    videotape of the proceedings to prosecutors at the Dane
    County District Attorney's office for review. Unlike a
    circuit court judge, the administrative law judge does not
    have authority to declare a person in contempt of court.

    The first four days of testimony focused on allegations that
    Suster inappropriately touched some of his patients and that
    he allegedly committed fraud by overbilling insurance
    companies for services he did not perform. Several female
    patients testified Suster kissed them during their
    appointments or touched their breasts for non-medical
    purposes. One of the doctor's medical assistants later
    testified that, in some cases, it was patients who initiated
    the affectionate behavior -- not the doctor."

    Trial Ends Suddenly: The State called its final witness
    Thursday morning, ending nine days of testimony against Dr.
    Suster. After Prosecutor Arthur Thexton rested the State's
    case, the pain doctor was then given an opportunity to take
    the witness stand. Suster chose not to testify in his own
    defense, citing his constitutional rights and a desire to
    not face cross-examination by the State.

    In what appeared to be a reversal of her earlier decision,
    the judge told Suster she would allow him to call defense
    witnesses, as long as each witness had information that
    could rebut testimony provided by the State. But when Suster
    began questioning the judge's impartiality rather than
    telling the judge the names of his witnesses, the judge
    announced she was ending the disciplinary hearing. The judge
    and prosecutor walked out of the hearing room as Suster
    began to read the names of dozens of witnesses he had
    planned to subpoena to the witness stand.

    The .pdf file on the WITI site contains the actual
    complaint. Read it.

    And..Bolen is defending him....

  3. "Mark Probert-March 26, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]> wrote
    in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    snip the stuff Bolen doesn't mention.

    And..Bolen is defending him....

    He sure can pick 'em.

    We learnt after the Kadile conviction that he was paying
    Bolen for his "public relations" expertise. If I recall
    correctly the court documents in Barrett's suit against
    Bolem's libels showed that Hulda paid Bolen heaps.

    I guess Bolen's recent silence was simply due to a gap
    between clients.

    Peter Moran

  4. "Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark Probert-March 26, 2004" <Mark Probert03-26-
    [email hidden]>


    wrote

    Quoted message said:

    in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    snip the stuff Bolen doesn't mention.

    And..Bolen is defending him....

    He sure can pick 'em.

    We learnt after the Kadile conviction that he was paying
    Bolen for his "public relations" expertise. If I recall
    correctly the court documents in Barrett's suit against
    Bolem's libels showed that Hulda paid Bolen heaps.

    I guess Bolen's recent silence was simply due to a gap
    between clients.

    I'll agree there was a gap, and I will have my
    otolaryngolist friend explain it more....

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.