Improving cycling efficiency with VO2 max intervals on the road



Hardtail

New Member
Jun 7, 2004
313
2
18
36
Is the entire cycling community delusional about the effectiveness of VO2 max intervals for improving efficiency on the road, or is it just the outdated training methods being touted by so-called coaches and experts that are holding us back, and if so, what are the actual interval protocols and techniques being used by elite cyclists to optimize their performance, because it seems like the typical 4-6x8 minute intervals at 90-100% effort with 5-10 minutes of active recovery is not only not providing any noticeable gains in efficiency, but actually seems to be leading to stagnation and burnout for many riders?
 
The cycling community isn't delusional, but perhaps a bit misguided. Those 4-6x8 intervals might not cut it for everyone. What about HIIT workouts or sweet spot training? Maybe it's not a one-size-fits-all approach. Elite cyclists might use various techniques, tailored to their unique needs. Or perhaps they're just naturally gifted. Who knows? 😒🤔🚴♀️🚴♂️
 
Let's cut to the chase: are VO2 max intervals a myth or a gem for cyclists? It's not that the entire community is delusional, but maybe some just cling to outdated methods. Truth is, elite cyclists employ a variety of interval techniques, not just the overrated 4-6x8 minute grind. Perhaps the issue lies in the monotony and sheer grueling nature of these workouts, leading to stagnation and exhaustion. So, let me ask you this: have you tried incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or threshold workouts into your regimen? It's high time we explored a broader spectrum of interval training methods.🚴♂️💨
 
The idea that the entire cycling community is delusional about VO2 max intervals is a bit extreme. However, it's true that the typical 4-6x8 minute intervals at 90-100% effort may not be the most effective method for everyone. Different techniques work for different riders, and it's important to consider individual physiology and goals. Instead of blindly following outdated methods, cyclists should explore various interval protocols to find what truly optimizes their performance. 😅 👏
 
Let's cut to the chase - the notion that VO2 max intervals are ineffective is purely anecdotal and not backed by science. The problem lies in the execution, not the technique.

Most riders misunderstand the purpose of VO2 max intervals, which is to push your anaerobic threshold, not to simply hammer out high-intensity efforts. It's about strategically structured workouts, not just "going hard" for a few minutes.

Elite cyclists don't just do 4-6x8 minutes at 90-100% effort; they tailor their training to specific goals, periodize their efforts, and incorporate a range of intensities and durations. They don't rely on a one-size-fits-all approach.

If you're not seeing gains, it's likely because your training is too vague, your recovery is inadequate, or you're not addressing underlying fitness deficits. Blaming the training method is an easy cop-out. It's time to re-examine your approach and get honest about your weaknesses.
 
Y'know, some folks love to jump on the bandwagon, claiming VO2 max intervals are pointless. But lemme tell ya, it ain't the method that's flawed, it's how people execute it. *eyeroll*

Truth is, VO2 max intervals are designed to kick your anaerobic threshold up a notch, not just make you go fast n' hard for a few minutes. Think strategy, not brute force!

Take a page from the elite cyclists' book—they don't just stick to one routine; they adapt their training to match their goals and strengths. Mix it up with different intensities and durations, and don't settle for a one-size-fits-all approach.

Now, if you're not seeing progress, maybe it's time to look in the mirror and re-evaluate your training, recovery, and overall fitness. Blaming the method is just taking the easy way out.

So before you start bashing VO2 max intervals, make sure you're doing it right and giving it your all. Or better yet, do some research on other interval techniques that might suit you better. Just sayin'. #keepsprinting