If walking slowly is indeed an effective way to burn fat, does this mean that Zone 2 training, which is often touted as the ideal fat-burning zone, is essentially just a form of overhyped walking? In other words, are we simply rebranding a slow and steady pace as a more efficient and effective way to burn fat, when in reality, its not all that different from a leisurely stroll?
Its well-established that walking slowly can be an effective way to burn fat, particularly for those who are new to exercise or are recovering from injury. However, the concept of Zone 2 training, which typically involves maintaining a moderate intensity for an extended period, is often presented as a more sophisticated and effective way to burn fat. But is this really the case?
If walking slowly can burn fat, then what exactly is the benefit of Zone 2 training? Is it simply a matter of marketing and perception, or is there something more at play here? Are there specific physiological benefits to Zone 2 training that make it more effective for fat loss, or is it just a more intense version of walking slowly?
Furthermore, if Zone 2 training is indeed just a form of overhyped walking, then what does this say about the way we approach training and fat loss in general? Are we overcomplicating things by creating elaborate training protocols, when in reality, a simple and slow approach might be just as effective?
Id love to hear from others on this topic - is Zone 2 training truly a more effective way to burn fat, or is it just a rebranded version of walking slowly?
Its well-established that walking slowly can be an effective way to burn fat, particularly for those who are new to exercise or are recovering from injury. However, the concept of Zone 2 training, which typically involves maintaining a moderate intensity for an extended period, is often presented as a more sophisticated and effective way to burn fat. But is this really the case?
If walking slowly can burn fat, then what exactly is the benefit of Zone 2 training? Is it simply a matter of marketing and perception, or is there something more at play here? Are there specific physiological benefits to Zone 2 training that make it more effective for fat loss, or is it just a more intense version of walking slowly?
Furthermore, if Zone 2 training is indeed just a form of overhyped walking, then what does this say about the way we approach training and fat loss in general? Are we overcomplicating things by creating elaborate training protocols, when in reality, a simple and slow approach might be just as effective?
Id love to hear from others on this topic - is Zone 2 training truly a more effective way to burn fat, or is it just a rebranded version of walking slowly?