How would you rate today's stage w/ Chiappucci in '92?



B

Bob Lee

Guest
Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before the
finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in Italy the
fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he pretty much
had to come to a dead stop.
 
"Bob Lee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
> pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
> drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
> catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before
> the finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in
> Italy the fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he
> pretty much had to come to a dead stop.



Chiapucci's exploit in itself was even more impressive that Landis'. First
of all, Chiappucci was already 200 km before the finish in the lead, second
the climbs were harder than today. On the other hand, because of the
importance of the stage (last mountain stage), and above all, because of
Landis' collapse the day before, his victory was IMO far more dramatic.

Benjo
 
Bob Lee wrote:
> Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
> pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
> drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
> catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before the
> finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in Italy the
> fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he pretty much
> had to come to a dead stop.



Back in 92 it was Claudio vs Indurain. Today it was Floyd vs.
Everyone.
Chiapucci did lead over every mountain however. Floyd looks like he
can
turn this into a victory, unlike Claudio backl in the day. Either way
two epic
stages.
 
benjo maso wrote:
> "Bob Lee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
> > pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
> > drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
> > catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before
> > the finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in
> > Italy the fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he
> > pretty much had to come to a dead stop.

>
>
> Chiapucci's exploit in itself was even more impressive that Landis'. First
> of all, Chiappucci was already 200 km before the finish in the lead, second
> the climbs were harder than today. On the other hand, because of the
> importance of the stage (last mountain stage), and above all, because of
> Landis' collapse the day before, his victory was IMO far more dramatic.





Dumbass -


Agreed and also if Landis ends up winning the overall because of
today's incredible ride, Chiapucci's ride won't compare because the
overall GC winner that year was still Miguel Indurain.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.
 
Bob Lee wrote:
> Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
> pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
> drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
> catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before the
> finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in Italy the
> fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he pretty much
> had to come to a dead stop.
>
>


Floyd forgot to bunnyhop his bike over each mountain prime.
 
"benjo maso" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Lee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
>> pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
>> drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going
>> to catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's
>> before the finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that
>> finished in Italy the fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple
>> of times he pretty much had to come to a dead stop.

>
>
> Chiapucci's exploit in itself was even more impressive that Landis'. First
> of all, Chiappucci was already 200 km before the finish in the lead,
> second the climbs were harder than today. On the other hand, because of
> the importance of the stage (last mountain stage), and above all, because
> of Landis' collapse the day before, his victory was IMO far more dramatic.


Far more hung on this ride than on Il Diablo's.
 
On 20 Jul 2006 20:01:21 -0700, "Kurgan Gringioni"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>benjo maso wrote:
>> "Bob Lee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
>> > pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
>> > drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
>> > catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before
>> > the finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in
>> > Italy the fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he
>> > pretty much had to come to a dead stop.

>>
>>
>> Chiapucci's exploit in itself was even more impressive that Landis'. First
>> of all, Chiappucci was already 200 km before the finish in the lead, second
>> the climbs were harder than today. On the other hand, because of the
>> importance of the stage (last mountain stage), and above all, because of
>> Landis' collapse the day before, his victory was IMO far more dramatic.

>
>
>
>
>Dumbass -
>
>
>Agreed and also if Landis ends up winning the overall because of
>today's incredible ride, Chiapucci's ride won't compare because the
>overall GC winner that year was still Miguel Indurain.
>
>
>thanks,
>
>K. Gringioni.


Dumbasses,

Did Ciapucci call his shot? Landis did:



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/austin_murphy/07/20/murphy.landis/index.html


I stood in front of the bus for a few moments when a wiry figure
appeared in the windshield. It was nice to see Landis smiling, I
remember thinking --- good to see that he'd already come to terms with
it. I offered what amounted to condolences. He accepted them
graciously. I told him how much I was looking forward to Saturday's
time trial, when he would have the opportunity to salvage something
from a Tour gone awry.

His smile came back. "You know," he said, "we may be able to get some
of that time back today."

He meant every syllable of that. Somehow, word got out in the peloton
that the Phonaks were going to try something preposterous. By doing
so, they would be inflicting suffering on the rest of a Tour-weary
bunch. Which explains why a number of riders coasted up to Landis
before the first mountain, imploring him not to attempt something so
foolhardy. As Landis would later recall, "I just told 'em, Go drink
some Coke, 'cause we're leaving on the first climb if you want to come
along.'"
 
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:13:44 +1200, Stu Fleming <[email protected]> wrote:

>Bob Lee wrote:
>> Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
>> pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
>> drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
>> catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before the
>> finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in Italy the
>> fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he pretty much
>> had to come to a dead stop.
>>
>>

>
>Floyd forgot to bunnyhop his bike over each mountain prime.


Yeah, but he did do a cyclocross dismount after crossing the finish line.

Ron
 
benjo maso wrote:
> "Bob Lee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Like Landis, Chiappucci broke away early from his main competitors and
> > pretty much solo'd the rest of way. And I actually though there was more
> > drama in '92, as for awhile it looked like Vona and Indurain were going to
> > catch up on Sestrieres...but then Big Mig blew up just a few km's before
> > the finish. And since Chiappucci was winning a stage that finished in
> > Italy the fans lining the course were unbelievable...a couple of times he
> > pretty much had to come to a dead stop.

>
>
> Chiapucci's exploit in itself was even more impressive that Landis'. First
> of all, Chiappucci was already 200 km before the finish in the lead, second
> the climbs were harder than today. On the other hand, because of the
> importance of the stage (last mountain stage), and above all, because of
> Landis' collapse the day before, his victory was IMO far more dramatic.


IIRC, on the last climb, Indurain clawed his way to within 2 minutes of
Chiapucci, only to have Chiapucci dig in and hold him off, even opening
the gap to Indurain. Only time I recall during Indurain's peak where he
wasn't able to dispatch any rider.
 
Michael Press wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> SH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "I just told 'em, `Go drink some Coke, 'cause we're
> leaving on the first climb if you want to come along'."
>
> That's immortal.
>
> --
> Michael Press


It must be so cool to have the 'gas' in your system to be able to make
such a statement.
 
In article
<[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Michael Press wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > SH <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > "I just told 'em, `Go drink some Coke, 'cause we're
> > leaving on the first climb if you want to come along'."
> >
> > That's immortal.

>
> It must be so cool to have the 'gas' in your system to be able to make
> such a statement.


Who ****** in your Wheaties this morning?

--
Michael Press
 
SH wrote:
> Dumbasses,
>
> Did Ciapucci call his shot? Landis did:
>
>
>
> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/austin_murphy/07/20/murphy.landis/index.html


It wouldn't be a mainstream American sports rag if they didn't screw up
a rider's name: Sastre, Pereiro.


--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,
 
Raptor wrote:
> SH wrote:
>
>> Dumbasses,
>>
>> Did Ciapucci call his shot? Landis did:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/austin_murphy/07/20/murphy.landis/index.html
>>

>
>
> It wouldn't be a mainstream American sports rag if they didn't screw up
> a rider's name: Sastre, Pereiro.


My dad insists that when pronouncing a Spanish name, you have to voice
each vowel. So "pear ee air oh" instead of "peh reh row." I'm not sure
I believe him.
 
"Sonarrat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>
>> It wouldn't be a mainstream American sports rag if they didn't screw up a
>> rider's name: Sastre, Pereiro.

>
> My dad insists that when pronouncing a Spanish name, you have to voice
> each vowel. So "pear ee air oh" instead of "peh reh row." I'm not sure I
> believe him.


He's right about the vowels, but it could be pronounced "peh reh' e roh".
There is a city in Colombia, Pereira, that is pronounced that way.
Non-native speakers struggle with it.