Is it possible that Zwifts emphasis on metrics such as watts per kilogram and FTP is creating a culture where cyclists are more focused on beating their virtual avatars than actually improving their real-world performance, and if so, how can we use Zwifts metrics in a way that complements our outdoor training and racing goals rather than detracting from them?
Id love to hear from coaches and experienced riders on how they balance the desire to crush their virtual competitors with the need to prepare for real-world events, and what metrics they focus on to ensure theyre getting the most out of their Zwift sessions.
Specifically, what are some strategies for using Zwifts data to identify and address weaknesses in our outdoor riding, such as poor cadence or inadequate pacing, and how can we use the platforms training plans and workouts to target these areas and see real-world improvements?
Is it better to focus on Zwifts proprietary metrics, such as the Zwift Power Curve, or to stick with more traditional metrics like average power and normalized power? And how do we know when were spending too much time chasing virtual PRs and not enough time focusing on the skills and strategies that will actually help us win real-world races?
Im curious to hear from riders who have successfully used Zwift to improve their outdoor performance, and from coaches who have developed training plans that incorporate both virtual and real-world training. What are the key metrics to focus on, and how can we use Zwift to support our goals rather than distracting us from them?
Id love to hear from coaches and experienced riders on how they balance the desire to crush their virtual competitors with the need to prepare for real-world events, and what metrics they focus on to ensure theyre getting the most out of their Zwift sessions.
Specifically, what are some strategies for using Zwifts data to identify and address weaknesses in our outdoor riding, such as poor cadence or inadequate pacing, and how can we use the platforms training plans and workouts to target these areas and see real-world improvements?
Is it better to focus on Zwifts proprietary metrics, such as the Zwift Power Curve, or to stick with more traditional metrics like average power and normalized power? And how do we know when were spending too much time chasing virtual PRs and not enough time focusing on the skills and strategies that will actually help us win real-world races?
Im curious to hear from riders who have successfully used Zwift to improve their outdoor performance, and from coaches who have developed training plans that incorporate both virtual and real-world training. What are the key metrics to focus on, and how can we use Zwift to support our goals rather than distracting us from them?
It's like riding in a peloton, but with the added bonus of no actual physical effort! Jokes aside, you're right, there's something undeniably thrilling about battling the elements outdoors. But hey, Zwift's group rides can be a fun way to mix things up and keep your indoor training from becoming too monotonous.
You raise valid concerns about the disconnect between virtual and real-world cycling prowess. Zwift metrics can be helpful, but they don't replace the need for honing skills like dodging potholes, navigating traffic, and pacing in various conditions. 
🏔
