How to use virtual platforms with dumb trainers

[jameshawk87]

Whats the most creative way to utilize a dumb trainer with virtual platforms without breaking the bank, considering most of these platforms seem to cater to smart trainers and their fancy ANT+ and Bluetooth connectivity. Are there any workarounds or hacks to get a decent virtual ride experience with a dumb trainer, or am I doomed to suffer through boring, uneventful indoor rides until I can afford to upgrade to a smart trainer. Can anyone think outside the box and come up with a solution that doesnt involve selling a kidney on the black market.

 

[xeus]

Feeling trapped on a dull trainer? Fear not, indoor rides don't have to be a snorefest! Embrace your 'dumb' trainer's charm. Get creative with sensors, tinker with third-party apps, or even repurpose an old laptop as your virtual trainer wingman. Sure, smart trainers get the love, but us budget-conscious cyclists can still have our virtual cake and eat it too. Let's make our 'dumb' trainers sing, shall we? ‍

 

[ManOnTheMoon]

A "dumb" trainer can still offer a smart experience. Consider using a speed sensor to transmit data to virtual platforms. While it may not provide the same accuracy as a smart trainer, it's a cost-effective solution. Additionally, some platforms offer workarounds, like ERG mode, which adjusts resistance automatically. It's not perfect, but it's a start.

 

[janmendoza]

Oh joy, another thrilling question about making do with subpar equipment. I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that you can't afford a smart trainer like everyone else.

In all seriousness, you can MacGyver a dumb trainer to work with virtual platforms, but it'll require some creative problem-solving and a healthy dose of technical wizardry. One possible hack is to use an Arduino or Raspberry Pi to create a DIY ANT+ or Bluetooth bridge. It's not exactly plug-and-play, but it's a feasible workaround if you're comfortable with coding and electronics.

Alternatively, you could try using a power meter pedal or crank-based system to estimate your power output and feed that data into a virtual platform. It won't provide the same level of immersion as a smart trainer, but it's better than staring at a blank wall while you pedal.

So, to answer your question, no, you're not doomed to suffer through boring indoor rides... yet. But do us all a favor and stop whining about not being able to afford a smart trainer.

 

[Svatze]

;-D Using a "dumb" trainer with virtual platforms doesn't have to be a drag! While it's true that many platforms push smart trainers' fancy connectivity, there are still options for us budget-conscious cyclists. One workaround is to use a speed or cadence sensor that can transmit ANT+ or Bluetooth signals to your device. This won't give you the same level of control as a smart trainer, but it can still provide a more engaging virtual ride experience.

How about using a power meter, if you have one or can get your hands on one? It can provide a more accurate and immersive experience when paired with a virtual platform. You might be thinking, "But power meters can be pricey!" Sure, but there are also affordable options out there, like the Stages or 4iiii power meters.

So, before you consider selling a kidney, explore these alternatives and see if they can spice up your indoor rides! ;-D

 

[ad5at]

Ha, selling a kidney, quite dramatic! A simpler workaround for your "dumb" trainer dilemma: why not try a cheap sensor that converts your analog resistance to something digital? Sure, it may not be as fancy as ANT+, but it'll do the job. Or, just embrace the boredom - isn't that what makes us cyclists so tough?