In the pursuit of optimizing TrainerRoads data for Functional Threshold Power (FTP) improvement, a crucial aspect is often overlooked: the interplay between TSS (Training Stress Score), CTL (Chronic Training Load), and ATL (Acute Training Load). While many of us focus on executing workouts with precision, are we truly harnessing the full potential of TrainerRoads data to inform our training decisions and drive meaningful gains in FTP?
Specifically, what role do you believe ATL should play in determining whether a workout is executed effectively? Should ATL be prioritized equally alongside TSS, or is it a secondary consideration? Some argue that ATL is merely a byproduct of the training process, while others contend that it is a critical metric for gauging the bodys acute response to stress.
Furthermore, how do you reconcile the relationship between CTL and ATL? Is it possible to have a high CTL without experiencing concomitant increases in ATL, and what implications does this have for FTP development? Should we be aiming to maintain a consistent ATL over time, or is it more beneficial to allow ATL to fluctuate in response to changes in training volume and intensity?
The conventional wisdom suggests that CTL is the primary driver of FTP gains, but is this truly the case? Can a well-structured training plan prioritize ATL without sacrificing gains in CTL, and ultimately, FTP? Id love to hear your thoughts on how to effectively utilize TrainerRoads data to optimize the interplay between TSS, CTL, and ATL, and how this can be leveraged to drive meaningful improvements in FTP.
Specifically, what role do you believe ATL should play in determining whether a workout is executed effectively? Should ATL be prioritized equally alongside TSS, or is it a secondary consideration? Some argue that ATL is merely a byproduct of the training process, while others contend that it is a critical metric for gauging the bodys acute response to stress.
Furthermore, how do you reconcile the relationship between CTL and ATL? Is it possible to have a high CTL without experiencing concomitant increases in ATL, and what implications does this have for FTP development? Should we be aiming to maintain a consistent ATL over time, or is it more beneficial to allow ATL to fluctuate in response to changes in training volume and intensity?
The conventional wisdom suggests that CTL is the primary driver of FTP gains, but is this truly the case? Can a well-structured training plan prioritize ATL without sacrificing gains in CTL, and ultimately, FTP? Id love to hear your thoughts on how to effectively utilize TrainerRoads data to optimize the interplay between TSS, CTL, and ATL, and how this can be leveraged to drive meaningful improvements in FTP.