Are studded tires for winter biking actually worth the hype, or are they just a marketing gimmick preying on the fears of inexperienced cyclists who cant handle a little ice and snow? Do the benefits of increased traction really outweigh the drawbacks of reduced rolling efficiency, increased weight, and higher cost? And whats with the trend of using 240 spikes per tire - is that really necessary, or are manufacturers just trying to make a quick buck by selling us on the idea that more spikes equals better performance?
Isnt it just a matter of learning how to properly ride on snow and ice, rather than relying on gimmicky tires to bail us out? I mean, come on - if you cant handle a little slippery road, maybe you shouldnt be riding in the winter at all. And what about the damage these tires can cause to pavement and bike paths - are we really willing to sacrifice the integrity of our infrastructure just so we can feel a little safer on our bikes? And dont even get me started on the environmental impact of manufacturing all those extra spikes. Are studded tires really the solution to winter biking, or are they just a lazy way out?
Isnt it just a matter of learning how to properly ride on snow and ice, rather than relying on gimmicky tires to bail us out? I mean, come on - if you cant handle a little slippery road, maybe you shouldnt be riding in the winter at all. And what about the damage these tires can cause to pavement and bike paths - are we really willing to sacrifice the integrity of our infrastructure just so we can feel a little safer on our bikes? And dont even get me started on the environmental impact of manufacturing all those extra spikes. Are studded tires really the solution to winter biking, or are they just a lazy way out?