Whats the point of using power meters for interval training if youre just going to set arbitrary power targets based on some generic FTP test, rather than factoring in individual physiological responses to different types of efforts?
Is it really worth the investment in a power meter if youre not going to take into account the nuances of your own aerobic and anaerobic systems when designing interval workouts?
And dont even get me started on the whole concept of Functional Threshold Power (FTP) as a benchmark for interval training.
How does a single, 20-minute all-out effort really provide an accurate snapshot of an athletes capabilities across the full range of interval intensities and durations?
Are we really to believe that the same rider will produce the same power output for a 5-minute all-out effort, a 20-minute threshold effort, and a 1-minute sprint effort, simply because their FTP is set at, say, 250 watts?
What about the impact of fatigue, nutrition, recovery, and other environmental factors on an athletes ability to produce power during interval workouts?
Dont these factors play a much bigger role in determining the effectiveness of interval training than some arbitrary power target based on a generic FTP test?
Can anyone explain to me why the current crop of power meter software and coaching methodologies seem to be ignoring these critical variables in favor of a simplistic, one-size-fits-all approach to interval training?
Is it really worth the investment in a power meter if youre not going to take into account the nuances of your own aerobic and anaerobic systems when designing interval workouts?
And dont even get me started on the whole concept of Functional Threshold Power (FTP) as a benchmark for interval training.
How does a single, 20-minute all-out effort really provide an accurate snapshot of an athletes capabilities across the full range of interval intensities and durations?
Are we really to believe that the same rider will produce the same power output for a 5-minute all-out effort, a 20-minute threshold effort, and a 1-minute sprint effort, simply because their FTP is set at, say, 250 watts?
What about the impact of fatigue, nutrition, recovery, and other environmental factors on an athletes ability to produce power during interval workouts?
Dont these factors play a much bigger role in determining the effectiveness of interval training than some arbitrary power target based on a generic FTP test?
Can anyone explain to me why the current crop of power meter software and coaching methodologies seem to be ignoring these critical variables in favor of a simplistic, one-size-fits-all approach to interval training?