Why do so many triathlon training plans still prioritise brick sessions and neglect the importance of adapting to different terrains. It seems absurd that despite the varying landscapes and environments that triathlons take place in, the same generic training plans are being peddled to athletes. How can anyone expect to adequately prepare for a mountainous triathlon by only training on flat roads and tracks.
Do hill repeats and speed work on a stationary bike really translate to tackling technical descents and steep climbs in real life. And what about the impact of different surfaces on bike handling and run performance - surely sprinting on a track doesnt prepare you for the loose gravel and uneven roads that many triathlons feature.
Its time to rethink the traditional training plan and start incorporating terrain-specific training. The likes of gravel and mountain biking should be pivotal in any serious triathletes training regimen, rather than just being seen as an occasional fun ride. The argument that any ride is better than no ride is weak - specific training for specific terrain is the only way to truly prepare for the demands of a triathlon.
Do hill repeats and speed work on a stationary bike really translate to tackling technical descents and steep climbs in real life. And what about the impact of different surfaces on bike handling and run performance - surely sprinting on a track doesnt prepare you for the loose gravel and uneven roads that many triathlons feature.
Its time to rethink the traditional training plan and start incorporating terrain-specific training. The likes of gravel and mountain biking should be pivotal in any serious triathletes training regimen, rather than just being seen as an occasional fun ride. The argument that any ride is better than no ride is weak - specific training for specific terrain is the only way to truly prepare for the demands of a triathlon.