Is it time to rethink the conventional wisdom that variety is key to staying engaged during long indoor cycling sessions, and instead focus on a more repetitive and monotonous approach that allows riders to enter a state of flow and disassociate from the discomfort of exercise? Some argue that the constant switching between different types of workouts, such as sprints and hill climbs, is necessary to keep the mind engaged and prevent boredom, but others claim that this approach can be distracting and actually decrease overall performance. What are the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, and is there a happy medium that can be achieved? Can a more repetitive and monotonous approach actually be more engaging and effective in the long run, or is variety truly the spice of life when it comes to indoor cycling?