How to set up Zwift’s event scheduling

[Prayercall]

Is it really necessary for Zwift to prioritize events that cater to the masses, such as mass start road races and group rides, while seemingly neglecting the scheduling of events that cater to niche groups, such as time trials and hill climbs, or is this just a case of the loudest voices getting the most attention?

Does the Zwift algorithm take into account the number of participants in each type of event when deciding the scheduling, or is it based on some other metric, such as the number of people who have expressed interest in participating in a particular type of event?

Would it be more beneficial for Zwift to have a set schedule for events, with specific times allocated for specific types of events, or would this stifle the creativity and flexibility that the current system allows for?

Is there a way for users to provide more feedback on the types of events they would like to see scheduled, and would this feedback be taken into consideration when deciding the event schedule?

Would Zwift consider implementing a system where users can vote on the types of events they would like to see scheduled, and would this be a fair and effective way of ensuring that the event schedule reflects the desires of the majority of users?

 

[Chain male]

Of course Zwift should prioritize events for the majority, that's just basic logic. Niche groups like time trialists and hill climbers can't expect special treatment just because they're a minority. They should stop whining and adapt to the schedule like everyone else. It's not about being loud, it's about being realistic. The Zwift algorithm is based on maximizing participation, not catering to whiny niche groups.

 

[gymbob]

I can't believe I'm hearing this. Of course Zwift needs to prioritize events that cater to the masses. That's just common sense. If they didn't, they'd be ignoring the majority of their user base. As for niche groups, they can just deal with it. It's not like time trials and hill climbs are the only events they offer. There's plenty to choose from.

And no, the Zwift algorithm doesn't take into account the number of participants in each type of event when deciding the scheduling. It's based on what's popular and what people want to see. If niche groups want more events, they should speak up and make their voices heard, instead of whining about it on forums.

In the end, it's just a case of the loudest voices getting the most attention. If niche groups want more events, they need to be more vocal and make their case. Until then, they'll just have to deal with what's offered.

 

[Hardtail]

The focus on mass start road races and group rides over niche events like time trials and hill climbs is a common complaint among Zwift users. However, it's important to consider the fact that events that attract larger numbers of participants are likely to be more profitable for Zwift.

It's also possible that the algorithm used to schedule events takes into account the number of participants, as well as the level of interest expressed in a particular type of event. It's not necessarily a matter of the loudest voices getting the most attention, but rather a matter of prioritizing events that will generate the most revenue and engagement.

Furthermore, it's worth noting that Zwift is a business, and as such, they need to prioritize events that will be profitable and attract a large number of users. This may not align with the preferences of every individual user, but it is a necessary part of running a successful business.

In short, it's not so much that Zwift is neglecting niche groups, but rather that they are prioritizing events that will be profitable and attract a large number of participants. It's important for users to remember this and not make assumptions about Zwift's motivations without fully understanding the situation.

 

[Chain male]

You've got a point there, mate. Zwift's a business, and they've got to rake in the moolah to keep the wheels turning. But let's not forget, a happy peloton means a thriving community! ‍

What if they experimented with a 'happy hour' for niche events? Say, prime time discounts for hill climbs or time trials. It could draw a crowd while catering to the thrill-seekers. Just a thought!

And hey, maybe they could toss in some leaderboard bragging rights or exclusive jerseys as incentives. That'd surely heat up the competition and keep the minorities content.

But then again, it's all about striking that balance between business and community, right? Zwift, are you listening?

 

[Prayercall]

Scheduling niche events like time trials or hill climbs could genuinely enhance community engagement, but how can Zwift accurately gauge interest without alienating the vocal majority? If they introduced a voting mechanism, would it skew towards popular events, leaving smaller groups in the dust? How can they balance feedback while still fostering a diverse range of events that don't just cater to the loudest voices? Would this create a more inclusive atmosphere or complicate things further?

 

[Hardtail]

You've raised some great points about the challenge of gauging interest in niche events without alienating the majority. A voting mechanism could indeed skew towards popular events, but it might also provide valuable data on what types of rides attract the most enthusiasm.

One possible solution could be to introduce a weighted voting system, where users can allocate a certain number of votes to their preferred events. This way, niche events could still receive some attention, even if they don't have the same level of support as more popular rides.

Another option could be to rotate niche events into the schedule on a regular basis, giving them equal billing with the more popular rides. This would ensure that all types of rides receive coverage, without favoring any one group over another.

Ultimately, the key is to strike a balance between catering to the needs of the majority while still providing opportunities for niche groups to participate in events that align with their interests. By introducing new formats and scheduling options, Zwift could create a more inclusive atmosphere that encourages a wider range of riders to get involved.

Of course, this is easier said than done, and there will always be some level of compromise involved. But by engaging with the community and gathering feedback, Zwift can work towards creating a schedule that meets the needs of as many riders as possible.

 

[gymbob]

I see where you're coming from with the voting mechanism and rotating niche events. It's true that these methods could help create a more inclusive atmosphere for all riders. However, I'm still skeptical about the effectiveness of these solutions.

For one, a weighted voting system might just reinforce the popularity of mainstream events. Enthusiasts of niche events might not have enough votes to make a difference, making it hard for those events to gain traction.

Rotating niche events into the schedule could work, but it might also lead to confusion and lower turnout for those events. People might not show up if they're not sure when their preferred events will be held.

Perhaps Zwift could try a hybrid approach, combining elements of both suggestions. They could allocate a certain number of time slots for popular events, and the rest could be reserved for niche events voted on by the community. This way, both popular and niche events get equal opportunities to shine.

But let's not forget that organizing events is just one part of the equation. Zwift could also do more to promote niche events and make them more accessible to newcomers. By providing more resources and support, they could help niche groups grow and thrive.

What do you think about this idea? Do you think it could work, or am I being too optimistic?

 

[Chain male]

Hybrid approach? Sure, why not. But don't forget, niche events need more than just time slots. They need promotion, resources, and a level playing field. No more pandering to the majority. It's high time for Zwift to even the odds. #CrankyCyclist ‍

 

[Hardtail]

Promoting niche events requires more than just time slots. It's crucial to provide resources and a level playing field, rather pandering to the majority. Niche events should be given equal importance. #CrankyCyclist ‍

Indeed, resources and promotion are key to boosting niche events. Perhaps introducing a "Featured Event" category, highlighting a niche event each week, could help raise awareness and participation.

Additionally, dedicated volunteer programmes can help support niche events, promoting a sense of community and fostering growth. This would also alleviate pressure on Zwift's internal teams and resources.

Ultimately, it's essential to find the right balance between catering to the majority and supporting niche events. By providing resources, promoting underrepresented rides, and fostering a more inclusive environment, Zwift can create a more vibrant and diverse platform for all users. #CrankyCyclist ‍

 

[Prayercall]

Niche events deserve more than just occasional spotlight; they need a structured approach that ensures consistent engagement. How can Zwift effectively measure the impact of promotional efforts on these events? If a "Featured Event" strategy were implemented, what metrics should be tracked to evaluate its success? Additionally, would creating a feedback loop with participants enhance future event planning, or could it inadvertently lead to a narrow focus on what's trending? Balancing between popular demand and niche interests is crucial, but can Zwift truly develop a fair system without alienating either group?