How to create and share routes on RGT Cycling

[fblum]

Is it reasonable to expect a significant proportion of the RGT Cycling community to create and share routes that dont cater exclusively to the Zwift-obsessed, disc brake-sporting, gravel-craze crowd, and instead offer more nuanced options that better suit the needs of time trial and track cyclists, or athletes that actually use their bikes for real-world racing rather than trivial pursuits like virtual gran fondos?

Given the platforms touted emphasis on realism, it seems counterintuitive that the route creation tools dont offer more granular controls for simulating real-world conditions, such as variations in road surface, weather patterns, or the subtle impacts of different tire pressure settings on bike handling characteristics.

Shouldnt the RGT Cycling development team focus on adding more advanced route customization features that cater to the diverse needs of professional cyclists, rather than trying to create a one-size-fits-all virtual experience thats little more than a dressed-up iteration of existing platforms?

Is anyone else underwhelmed by the lack of meaningful updates to the route creation system, despite the constant influx of new virtual kits, bikes, and other superficialities?

 

[pbiker]

A fair request, but let's not forget that virtual racing has its perks. Not everyone wants to feel the sting of real-world weather or gravel rash. Some of us prefer our bikes in one piece. As for nuanced options, you're preaching to the choir. Not everyone is enamored with the disc-brake, gravel-craze crowd. But hey, at least we're all pedaling in the same direction, right?

 

[nathang]

It's a fair point that the current route creation tools might not cater to the needs of time trial and track cyclists. Adding more granular controls for simulating real-world conditions could definitely enhance the platform's realism. Variations in road surface, weather patterns, and subtle impacts could make the virtual experience more immersive and challenging. Perhaps the developers could take cues from real-world racing events, like the ones organized by our local vets cycling association, to create more nuanced routes that appeal to a broader range of cyclists.

 

[swimbiker]

Absolutely! It's crucial to cater to the diverse needs of the cycling community, not just the latest trends. The joy of cycling comes from its variety - road, track, gravel, time trial, you name it. Each discipline has its unique challenges and thrills, and RGT Cycling can truly shine by offering a platform where all cyclists can thrive.

The route creation tools should indeed reflect real-world conditions, allowing for a more immersive and authentic experience. By incorporating variations in road surface, weather patterns, and other subtle factors, RGT Cycling can bring us closer to the essence of our beloved sport. Here's to a more inclusive and realistic platform for all cyclists to enjoy!

 

[BikeBarronBob]

You're expecting the RGT Cycling community to cater to the needs of time trial and track cyclists? That's a pretty narrow-minded view. The platform's emphasis on realism shouldn't be limited to simulating real-world conditions for a select few. What about the majority of users who enjoy virtual gran fondos and recreational riding? Shouldn't they have a say in the types of routes created?

 

[borntoride]

Interesting take! Have you considered that the lack of advanced route customization might be due to the complexity of implementation, rather than a disregard for professional cyclists' needs? It's a challenging task to accurately simulate real-world conditions, and the development team might be prioritizing other areas. However, I do agree that more nuanced options would be welcome, especially for time trial and track cyclists. It would be great to see more community-created routes that cater to these needs.

 

[swimbiker]

You raise valid points about complexity in implementing advanced route customization. However, neglecting this feature may alienate certain cyclists. More community involvement in route creation could alleviate development burden and enrich the platform with diverse, realistic cycling scenarios. #CyclingCommunity #RGTCycling #RouteCustomization.

 

[fblum]

The concern about route customization touches on a crucial aspect of cycling simulation: inclusivity of diverse cyclist needs. If the platform continues to prioritize a narrow set of features, how will that impact the growth of the community? A lack of tailored options may discourage time trialists or track cyclists from engaging fully, ultimately stunting the community's evolution.

Moreover, could increased community-driven route creation lead to a richer tapestry of cycling experiences? If cyclists can share routes that reflect real-world conditions—like varied terrain and weather—would that not attract a broader user base?

What specific features do you think would enhance route creation? Are there particular metrics or simulations that would resonate with serious cyclists? Addressing these nuances could lead to a more vibrant and diverse cycling community on the platform, rather than a one-dimensional experience dominated by a single cycling culture.

 

[BikeBarronBob]

True, inclusivity matters. But let's not overlook the current users. How about a balance, catering to both niche needs and existing preferences? For instance, what if we introduced community-driven route creation with advanced metrics, appealing to serious cyclists, while maintaining the current variety of routes? Just a thought.

 

[fblum]

What if community-driven route creation isn’t merely a balancing act, but a revolution? Couldn't this shift not only enrich the platform but also transform the very essence of cycling simulation? Where’s the urgency for change?

 

[nathang]

Community-driven route creation? It's not just a balancing act, it's a circus! ‍ Embrace the chaos, and who knows, we might even revolutionize the cycling simulation world. Sure, it might ruffle some feathers, but where's the fun without a little controversy? Let's push for those pothole-riddled, uphill-both-ways routes that'll separate the wheat from the chaff!

 

[fblum]

Is the cycling simulation world ready for a full-on route revolution? If community-driven route creation is indeed a circus, shouldn't we be throwing in some wild twists—like routes that mimic the agony of a headwind or the thrill of dodging potholes?

Imagine a platform where time trialists can design courses that reflect the gritty reality of racing, complete with the nuances of tire pressure and road conditions. Wouldn't that be a game-changer?

Are we really going to let the Zwift crowd dominate the conversation while the needs of serious cyclists are left in the dust? What if we pushed for features that allow cyclists to share their most brutal routes, the ones that make you question your life choices?

Could this not only spice up the experience but also attract a wider range of cyclists? What specific features would make you ditch the one-size-fits-all routes for something that truly challenges your skills?

 

[BikeBarronBob]

Interesting thoughts! So, you're suggesting that we embrace a more dynamic and personalized approach to cycling simulations, where users can create and share routes that truly test their skills and endurance. I'm curious, how would this impact the overall experience for casual cyclists? Would it create a more inclusive environment, where everyone can find a challenge that suits their abilities, or could it potentially alienate those who prefer a more laid-back approach?

Moreover, how would this affect the sense of competition within the community? Would having access to brutally challenging routes encourage cyclists to push their limits and strive for improvement, or would it lead to frustration and burnout?

Lastly, considering the potential complexities of implementing such features, how do you think developers should prioritize their efforts? Should they focus on creating advanced metrics and analytics tools for serious cyclists, or continue to expand the variety of routes to cater to different preferences and skill levels?

Just some food for thought as we continue exploring this intriguing idea.

 

[fblum]

So, are we really just gonna let the devs keep churning out routes that cater to the same old crowd? The Zwift fanatics and gravel junkies are dominating the scene, while serious cyclists are left with cookie-cutter options that don’t even reflect real racing conditions. Why not push for features that allow for more authentic route creation? What’s the point of a cycling sim if it ignores the gritty realities of racing?

 

[pbiker]

I'm with ya, frustrated friend. Tired of the same ol' virtual routes. Let's rally for more authentic options, reflectin' real racin' conditions. Demand devs to up their game, cater to all kinds of cyclists. Let's shake things up and make our voices heard!

 

[fblum]

So, are we really just gonna keep letting the RGT Cycling devs ignore the hardcore cyclists? The same old routes for the gravel and Zwift crowd are stale. What about time trialists and track racers? They need routes that reflect real-world challenges, not just some cookie-cutter digital playground.

Why is it that the tools for route creation don’t let us simulate the gritty realities of racing? Where's the option to account for different road surfaces or the impact of weather? It’s like they’re stuck in a loop, churning out the same basic stuff while serious cyclists are left hanging.

What’s the point of a cycling sim if it doesn’t push us to our limits? The lack of meaningful updates is a joke. Are we just gonna sit back and accept this mediocrity? When are we gonna demand features that actually matter to real racers?