How does the Saucony Kinvara 14 compare to the Nike Free RN 5.0?

[David Hutchins]

Whats the point of even considering the Nike Free RN 5.0 when the Saucony Kinvara 14 is clearly a more substantial shoe? I mean, the Kinvara 14 has a more responsive midsole, a more comfortable upper, and a more durable outsole. The Free RN 5.0, on the other hand, is just a watered-down version of a real running shoe. Its like Nike took all the leftover materials from their other shoes and mashed them together into a mediocre product.

Ive seen people raving about the Free RN 5.0s flexibility and lightweight design, but lets be real, those are just code words for lacking in support and will fall apart after 50 miles. The Kinvara 14, on the other hand, is a real running shoe that can handle the demands of serious runners.

So, Id love to hear from all you Free RN 5.0 fanboys out there - what exactly do you think makes this shoe better than the Kinvara 14? Is it the fact that its cheaper? Because if thats the case, then youre just getting what you pay for. Or is it the fact that its trendy and all the cool kids are wearing it? Because if thats the case, then youre just a sheep following the herd.

Lets get real here - the Kinvara 14 is a superior shoe in every way. So, whats the point of even considering the Free RN 5.0?

 

[hellsbells]

Oh, I see what you're saying. You're comparing the Nike Free RN 5.0 to the Saucony Kinvara 14 and concluding that the Kinvara 1

 

[DaveS]

Absolutely, the Saucony Kinvara 1

 

[OPC]

The Kinvara 14 may have more features, but the Free RN 5.0 offers something different. Its flexibility and lightweight design cater to runners who value agility and a barefoot feel. Yes, it may not be as durable, but for some, the trade-off is worth it for the unique running experience it provides. It's not about following trends, it's about finding the right shoe for your specific needs.

 

[brettm]

Free RN 5.0 offers flexibility, true. But, let's not dismiss its merits. Its lightweight design caters to those preferring less bulk, prioritizing ground feel & speed over max cushioning. It's not about being a "fanboy," it's about choosing what suits your unique running style & goals.

 

[fblum]

Ha! Looks like we've got a Kinvara superfan on our hands! Don't get me wrong, the Kinvara 14 is a solid shoe, but let's not write off the Free RN 5.0 so quickly. Sure, it may not have the same level of support or durability, but for some runners, that's not the top priority.

Some folks prefer a more minimalist shoe that lets them feel more connected to the road. And when it comes to flexibility and lightweight design, the Free RN 5.0 really shines. It's like driving a sports car instead of an SUV - sometimes, less is more.

Now, I'm not saying the Free RN 5.0 is the right choice for everyone. But it's important to remember that different runners have different needs and preferences. So instead of trashing one shoe or the other, let's celebrate the diversity of options out there!

And who knows, maybe there's a runner out there who will swear by the Free RN 5.0's superiority over the Kinvara 14. To each their own, right?

 

[David Hutchins]

So, we're all about that minimalist vibe, huh? But let’s face it, the Free RN 5.0’s flexibility might just be a euphemism for “good luck on your long runs.” If the road feels like a trampoline underfoot, how long before you’re wishing for a bit more cushion? Isn’t it just a little suspicious when “connected to the road” sounds a lot like “you’ll feel every pebble”? What’s the real gain here?