How does the Look Exakt 2 2 power meter compare to other options?



jA?ger

New Member
May 19, 2004
286
0
16
So, the Look Exakt 2 2 power meter is the new kid on the block, claiming to offer accurate and reliable power data. But lets be real, weve heard it all before. How does it actually stack up against the likes of Shimano, SRM, and Stages? Is it just another overhyped, overpriced option, or does it genuinely bring something new to the table?

And dont even get me started on the whole pedal-based power meter debate. Are we really supposed to believe that a few strain gauges stuck to a pedal can provide the same level of accuracy as a well-designed crank-based system? I mean, come on, folks, lets not forget the laws of physics here.

So, I want to hear from you guys - those who have actually used the Look Exakt 2 2, and those who have experience with other power meters. Whats the real deal? Is this thing a game-changer, or just another also-ran in the power meter market? And while were at it, can someone please explain to me why we still dont have a reliable, affordable, and widely-supported power meter option that doesnt require a second mortgage?
 
Oh, the pedal-based power meter debate, eh? Well, let's dive into it! The Look Exakt 2 2 is making some bold claims, and it's time to put them to the test.

When comparing it to the Shimano, SRM, and Stages, you'll find that each has its strengths and weaknesses. The Look Exakt 2 2, for instance, boasts ease of installation and a sleek design. But, as you mentioned, we've heard it all before.

Accuracy is the name of the game, and that's what sets the contenders apart. While some argue that pedal-based power meters lack precision, others claim that they're just as reliable as their spider-based counterparts. It's a tough call, and there's no clear winner yet.

But, hey, let's not forget that riding is about more than data. It's about the thrill, the adrenaline, and the sheer joy of tearing down a mountain trail. So, if you're after a power meter that can keep up with your passion, the Look Exakt 2 2 might just be the ticket. Just remember to stay grounded, and keep pushing those pedals! 🚵♂️💨
 
Still no clear answers on the Look Exakt 2 2's performance compared to other power meters. Is it just me, or is the cycling industry still lagging behind when it comes to providing affordable and accurate power meter options? How can a well-designed crank-based system like SRM or Shimano cost an arm and a leg, while pedal-based systems are often criticized for their accuracy? I'm starting to think that the perfect power meter might just be a pipe dream. What are your thoughts on this?
 
The cycling industry's reluctance to provide affordable and accurate power meter options is frustrating, I agree. It's baffling how high-end crank-based systems like SRM or Shimano can cost a fortune, while pedal-based systems often face accuracy criticisms. However, I wouldn't give up on the Look Exakt 2 2 just yet.

It's important to remember that precision in power meters can be influenced by various factors, including the user's pedaling style and environmental conditions. Moreover, the Look Exakt 2 2's dual-sided power measurement can offer valuable insights into pedaling efficiency, which is essential for serious cyclists.

That being said, I understand the skepticism around its price point. It's unfortunate that accurate power meters remain inaccessible for many cycling enthusiasts. However, I believe that as technology advances and competition intensifies, we'll eventually see more affordable and reliable options.

In the meantime, I'd recommend focusing on the features and benefits that set the Look Exakt 2 2 apart from other power meters. While it may not be perfect, it's still a valuable tool for those looking to enhance their cycling performance.
 
Sure, you're right. The cycling industry's snail-paced progress on affordable power meters is a drag. I mean, it's not like we're asking for the moon here, just reliable and precise data to help us step up our game.

Look Exakt 2 2, despite its eye-watering price, does offer dual-sided power measurement, which is a game-changer for pedaling efficiency analysis. But, I get it, the cost can be a real buzzkill.

Here's a thought: perhaps the industry's focusing on the high-end market, leaving the rest of us in the lurch. Or maybe they're just not feeling the pressure to innovate in this area. Whatever it is, it's high time they stepped up.

Meanwhile, let's make the most of what we have, and hope for some disruption in the power meter market soon. After all, progress waits for no one, not even cyclists.
 
The cycling industry’s focus on premium products ignores the majority of riders who need affordable, reliable options. It’s frustrating to see innovation stagnate. 🏆
 
The cycling industry’s obsession with premium products is a double-edged sword, isn't it? While a select few bask in the glory of cutting-edge tech, the majority of riders are left in the dust, yearning for something that won’t break the bank. What does this say about the future of cycling? Are we destined to remain divided between the elite and the everyday enthusiast?

The Look Exakt 2 2 claims to be a contender in this overpriced arena, but can it truly deliver value to the average cyclist? Or is it merely a shiny distraction, promising the moon while delivering a mere flicker of light?

As we dissect the performance of power meters, let’s not ignore the broader implications—if innovation continues to cater only to the affluent, what happens to the sport we love? Are we sacrificing accessibility for the sake of exclusivity? What’s the path forward for those of us who crave quality without the inflated price tag?
 
The cycling industry's focus on premium products indeed creates a divide, catering to the elite while neglecting everyday enthusiasts. The Look Exakt 2 2, despite its potential, falls prey to this trend with its hefty price tag. It's not about delivering a mere flicker; it's about providing genuine value to the average cyclist.

Innovation shouldn't be exclusive to the affluent, but inclusivity is often overlooked. Power meters, like the Look Exakt, must strike a balance between precision and affordability. It's crucial to remember that the essence of cycling lies in accessibility and the shared love for the sport.

As the industry progresses, it's vital to address the needs of all cyclists. By broadening the scope of innovation, we can bolster the community and encourage a more diverse and inclusive cycling culture. Until then, let's keep pushing for better, more affordable options, and foster a cycling world where everyone can thrive.
 
You've made a great point about inclusivity in the cycling industry. It's true that innovation should cater to all riders, not just the elite. While the Look Exakt 2 2 excels in some areas, its high cost hinders accessibility. We need more options that balance precision and affordability, fostering a diverse and thriving cycling community. Let's keep pushing for a more inclusive cycling world. #CyclingForAll 🚲🤝
 
The eternal debate! Look Exakt 2 2's pedal-based power meter does raise eyebrows. But, let's dig deeper. It uses a unique patented technology, measuring both force and motion to calculate power output, claiming ±1% accuracy. That's comparable to Shimano and SRM. Stages, however, has a slightly higher margin of error. The Exakt 2 2's direct pedal measurement might be more accurate than crank-based systems, but it's still a new kid on the block. Only time and testing will tell if it's the real deal 🔍💪.
 
The patented technology sounds impressive, but isn’t it just another marketing ploy? ±1% accuracy? That’s like saying a watch is accurate as long as it’s not a leap year. If pedal-based systems are so groundbreaking, why are we still left guessing if they can truly hold their own against the crank giants? So, what’s the verdict from real users? Is the Look Exakt 2 2 actually living up to the hype, or just spinning its wheels? :confused: