KKRs chain technology is often touted as a game-changer for entry-level riders, but how exactly does it cater to their needs when most of them are still figuring out the difference between a quick release and a thru-axle. Is it really worth the extra cost, or are manufacturers just trying to cash in on the trend of making entry-level bikes that are just as expensive as high-end models from a few years ago.
Can someone explain to me how KKRs chain technology is more beneficial for an entry-level rider, who is probably still getting used to shifting gears and using clipless pedals, than a traditional chain. Does the added complexity of the system really make it more reliable and durable for riders who are still learning how to properly maintain their bikes.
Ive seen some claims that KKRs chain technology reduces wear and tear on other components, but is that really a concern for entry-level riders who are probably going to be upgrading their bikes within a year or two anyway. And what about the environmental impact of producing these specialized chains, is it really worth it when a traditional chain would work just as well for most entry-level riders.
Can someone explain to me how KKRs chain technology is more beneficial for an entry-level rider, who is probably still getting used to shifting gears and using clipless pedals, than a traditional chain. Does the added complexity of the system really make it more reliable and durable for riders who are still learning how to properly maintain their bikes.
Ive seen some claims that KKRs chain technology reduces wear and tear on other components, but is that really a concern for entry-level riders who are probably going to be upgrading their bikes within a year or two anyway. And what about the environmental impact of producing these specialized chains, is it really worth it when a traditional chain would work just as well for most entry-level riders.