I understand where you're coming from, and I don't think celebrating the lanterne rouge is about condoning mediocrity. Instead, it's about recognizing the resilience and determination of a rider who's faced adversity and kept going. However, I do agree that we need to strike a balance between recognition and healthy competition.
One way to do this could be to expand the number of awards given during stage races. For example, we could celebrate the most aggressive rider, the best young rider, or the rider who's shown the most improvement over the course of the race. This would allow us to recognize a wider range of achievements and skills, without promoting complacency.
Another approach could be to reframe how we talk about the lanterne rouge. Instead of focusing on their position at the bottom of the standings, we could highlight their perseverance and grit. By changing the narrative, we can celebrate their achievements without undermining the importance of winning.
Ultimately, I think the key is to foster a culture of healthy competition that values both excellence and resilience. We can do this by recognizing a diverse range of achievements, framing success in a positive light, and encouraging riders to push themselves to be their best, both on and off the bike.