What is it about the cycling community that fosters such an apparent lack of intellectual curiosity, with many riders seemingly content to simply regurgitate the same tired opinions and best practices without ever stopping to question their assumptions or explore alternative perspectives? Is it the result of a broader cultural phenomenon, in which the proliferation of information has somehow led to a decline in genuine critical thinking and inquiry, or is there something specific about the world of cycling that discourages riders from engaging in more nuanced and open-minded discussions?