Im calling BS on the whole cycling retrospective study thing. So, supposedly, its meant to help people stay motivated during their weight loss journey, but whats the point of reflecting on past rides if youre not even seeing any progress? Is it just a bunch of navel-gazing nonsense or can someone actually explain to me how looking back at their past cycling stats is going to magically make them more motivated to lose weight? And dont even get me started on the whole study part - are we talking about some kind of official, peer-reviewed research here, or is this just a fancy way of saying I looked at my Strava data and felt good about myself? Can someone please explain to me how a retrospective study is going to be more effective than, say, actually setting specific, measurable goals and working towards them? And whats the deal with the whole retrospective part anyway - are we only looking at past successes, or do we also get to dwell on past failures and use those as motivation too?